On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 2:19 PM, AlunFoto wrote:
> I got somewhere betweeen 40 and 50 images in there before the voting
> started. Now I'm _nearly_ up to 100, after some seriously persistant
> submitting. In periods I don't get anything through at all, and at
> other times I have a fantastic succ
My original goal in PPG was to have as much photos as I am old, now it
seems I have to grow older.
I mentioned to Jostein that I simply keep throwing photos in and
whenever they are declined, I look hard at the photo and either delete
it from the pool or change the title. I suspect that they can
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 2:19 PM, AlunFoto wrote:
> 2009/2/17 Subash :
>> i did submit a few last year (after the peer voting came in) and after
>> those got rejected, did not bother to submit again. perhaps i'll submit
>> a few again... :)
>
> Keep at it! :)
thanks for the heads up. ;-) tonight i
2009/2/17 Subash :
> On Mon, 16 Feb 2009 22:31:33 +0100
> AlunFoto wrote:
>
>> There are probably lots who have submitted a few and given up.
>> Persistence pays off, take my word for it.
>
> i did submit a few last year (after the peer voting came in) and after
> those got rejected, did not bothe
On Mon, 16 Feb 2009 22:31:33 +0100
AlunFoto wrote:
> There are probably lots who have submitted a few and given up.
> Persistence pays off, take my word for it.
i did submit a few last year (after the peer voting came in) and after
those got rejected, did not bother to submit again. perhaps i'll
Persistence pays off, take my word for it.
What he said !
Kenneth Waller
http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f
- Original Message -
From: "AlunFoto"
Subject: Re: How many contributors to PPG?
I think it's great that they've attracted as many as 1192 represented
photo
Don't forget your towel.
And thanks for the fish
Kenneth Waller
http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f
- Original Message -
From:
Subject: Re: How many contributors to PPG?
In a message dated 2/16/2009 10:29:06 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,
cagu...@earthlink.net writes:
Alrig
From: "Christine Aguila"
From: "Tim ?sleby"
> 42?
Alright, I give: I don't get the significance of the number 42. Can it be
explained?;-) . Cheers, Christine
Google 42 and all will be revealed.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pd
On Mon, 16 Feb 2009 22:52:53 -, "Bob W" said:
>
> > > There are probably lots who have submitted a few and given up.
> > > Persistence pays off, take my word for it.
> > >
> >
> >
> > I agree with that but the reason I keep contributing is that the
> > existence of the PPG has given my pho
> > There are probably lots who have submitted a few and given up.
> > Persistence pays off, take my word for it.
> >
>
>
> I agree with that but the reason I keep contributing is that the
> existence of the PPG has given my photography more focus (no pun
> intended). I'm more conscious of com
On Mon, 16 Feb 2009 22:31:33 +0100, "AlunFoto"
said:
> I think it's great that they've attracted as many as 1192 represented
> photographers.
>
> There are probably lots who have submitted a few and given up.
> Persistence pays off, take my word for it.
>
I agree with that but the reason I kee
On Mon, 16 Feb 2009 16:15:23 +0100, "AlunFoto"
said:
> Have a guess before looking at this page:
>
> http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/artists
>
> Awesome.
>
> Jostein
I guessed about 1000, so that wasn't too far off the mark but I hate
lists that are alphabetical by surname!
Cheers
B
I think it's great that they've attracted as many as 1192 represented
photographers.
There are probably lots who have submitted a few and given up.
Persistence pays off, take my word for it.
Jostein
2009/2/16 Tim Øsleby :
> 42?
>
> --
> MaritimTim
>
> 2009/2/16 AlunFoto :
>> Have a guess before
I gave up trying to contribute. The submission process is awkward and
lengthy to do. Since the voting nonsense began, many photos that are
rejected are of better quality than the ones accepted, IMO.
I left what had been accepted of mine there as I saw no reason to pull
them down.
G
--
P
In a message dated 2/16/2009 10:58:19 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,
sdlovel...@gmail.com writes:
Of the 3 I submitted, one was added the gallery. I got in just before
they switched to the popularity-contest selection model. After that I
stopped submitting and deleted my account.
--
Scott Lov
On Feb 16, 2009, at 10:55 AM, Tim Øsleby wrote:
42 is partly a joke, partly religion.
You need to read the book to appreciate it. Maybe you never will
appreciate it.
Some loves the story, others simply don't get it. I think the latter
group is the intelligent one.
Like the mice, eh?
G
--
In a message dated 2/16/2009 10:55:32 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,
maritim...@gmail.com writes:
42 is partly a joke, partly religion.
You need to read the book to appreciate it. Maybe you never will appreciate
it.
Some loves the story, others simply don't get it. I think the latter
group is t
On 2/16/09, eactiv...@aol.com wrote:
> In a message dated 2/16/2009 7:15:59 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,
>
> alunf...@gmail.com writes:
> Have a guess before looking at this page:
>
> http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/artists
>
> Awesome.
>
> Jostein
>
>
>
> Yeah, well, th
42 is partly a joke, partly religion.
You need to read the book to appreciate it. Maybe you never will appreciate it.
Some loves the story, others simply don't get it. I think the latter
group is the intelligent one.
--
MaritimTim
2009/2/16 Christine Aguila :
>
> From: "Tim Øsleby"
>
>
>> 42?
From: "Adam Maas"
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 1:25 PM, Christine Aguila
wrote:
From: "Tim Øsleby"
42?
Alright, I give: I don't get the significance of the number 42. Can it
be
explained? ;-). Cheers, Christine
It's the answer to the ultimate question of Life the Universe and
E
On 16/2/09, Christine Aguila, discombobulated, unleashed:
>Alright, I give: I don't get the significance of the number 42. Can it be
>explained?
Yes.
But it will take a little time..
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.
In a message dated 2/16/2009 10:29:06 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,
cagu...@earthlink.net writes:
Alright, I give: I don't get the significance of the number 42. Can it be
explained? ;-). Cheers, Christine
=
Don't forget your towel.
Marnie aka Doe :-) (Okay, I give, G
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 1:25 PM, Christine Aguila
wrote:
>
> From: "Tim Øsleby"
>
>
>> 42?
>
>
> Alright, I give: I don't get the significance of the number 42. Can it be
> explained? ;-). Cheers, Christine
>
It's the answer to the ultimate question of Life the Universe and
Everything in D
From: "Tim Øsleby"
42?
Alright, I give: I don't get the significance of the number 42. Can it be
explained? ;-). Cheers, Christine
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link di
In a message dated 2/16/2009 7:15:59 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,
alunf...@gmail.com writes:
Have a guess before looking at this page:
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/artists
Awesome.
Jostein
Yeah, well, they never accepted any of mine. Not even the ones that are now
in
42?
--
MaritimTim
2009/2/16 AlunFoto :
> Have a guess before looking at this page:
>
> http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/artists
>
> Awesome.
>
> Jostein
>
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit th
26 matches
Mail list logo
