Re: OT: Playing in the dirt and the water

2012-10-15 Thread Chris Mitchell
On 14 October 2012 19:34, Paul Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote: I mentioned how much fun it was driving this thing a while back. Embargo is off today, and my article is in the Times and on the web. The machine is called a Quadski, and it's a hoot, an expensive hoot, but a hoot.

Re: OT: Playing in the dirt and the water

2012-10-14 Thread Stan Halpin
Nice article. Next time you talk with the company, suggest considering a snowmobile version. It would make for less concern when driving on thin ice. Great for the ice fishers concerned about getting stranded when their ice turns into a floe and drifts further from shore . . . stan On Oct 14,

RE: OT: Playing in the dirt and the water

2012-10-14 Thread knarftheria...@gmail.com
Very interesting craft. It really sounds to be more than capable on both land and water. You said it's expensive so I have to say I was surprised when I saw the price - much lower than I expected. I'll never get one. Even if I could afford one they're just not my thing. I wonder though, how

Re: OT: Playing in the dirt and the water

2012-10-14 Thread knarftheria...@gmail.com
Ah, yes. Ice fishing! Every year several Ontarians die plunging through the ice or getting caught on a melting ice foe that melts to nothing. I figure it's Darwinism in action... ;-) cheers, frank What can be asserted without proof can be dismissed without proof. -- Christopher Hitchens

Re: OT: Playing in the dirt and the water

2012-10-14 Thread Steven Desjardins
It's nice but $40,000? You can get a Seadoo and a quad bike for under $20,000. On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 5:42 PM, knarftheria...@gmail.com knarftheria...@gmail.com wrote: Ah, yes. Ice fishing! Every year several Ontarians die plunging through the ice or getting caught on a melting ice foe that

Re: OT: Playing in the dirt and the water

2012-10-14 Thread Paul Stenquist
I didn't find the noise level annoying while riding it. I know it has to meet government standards. In Michigan we have all-sports lakes and motor-free lakes. So those who want to get away from the noise have an alternative. Of course many of the big metro-area lakes are all-sport, but I would

Re: OT: Playing in the dirt and the water

2012-10-14 Thread Steven Desjardins
Sorry, Paul, for that terse reply. It's a very good article and you write well. I just feel bad for folks like this who make these things or small volume sportbikes, etc. It's so hard for them to survive. I just noticed a new email from you below. On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 6:28 PM, Steven

Re: OT: Playing in the dirt and the water

2012-10-14 Thread Paul Stenquist
An ice capable version crossed my mind. I suspect this vehicle would do fine with some kind of tire chain or studded tires. With just the standard tires, which are knobby, it was fine in sand. It would be nice to be on a vehicle that floats when traversing the ice. Paul On Oct 14, 2012, at

Re: OT: Playing in the dirt and the water

2012-10-14 Thread Paul Stenquist
On Oct 14, 2012, at 6:28 PM, Steven Desjardins drd1...@gmail.com wrote: It's nice but $40,000? You can get a Seadoo and a quad bike for under $20,000. Yes, it's no bargain, but it does have advantages over a two-vehicle solution, and they're only planning on sales of 1000 the first year. I

Re: OT: Playing in the dirt and the water

2012-10-14 Thread knarftheria...@gmail.com
Just curious. I assume that every PWC that buzzes the shoreline of Lake Ontario meets those same government noise standards, and they are loud. Having motor and non-motor lakes is a great idea unless one lives by a motor lake and is bothered by the noise. Personally I am more worried about how

Re: OT: Playing in the dirt and the water

2012-10-14 Thread Paul Stenquist
I don't know how limiting the noise standard might be, and it may be different in Canada. I suspect that it's the jet that makes PWCs loud. There are regulations on most of our lakes meant to keep watercraft a sizable distance from shore, although I suspect those rules are frequently violated.