On Oct 11, 2012, at 4:55 AM, Ann Sanfedele ann...@nyc.rr.com wrote:
the on topic aspect is that I took all the photos in my Back In the Day
Calendar with my old Pentax Kx'en. Except for one taken in 1971 with a
RICOH(!)
This was in todays NY times (at least the online version)
I'm right
On 10/11/2012 01:58, steve harley wrote:
on 2012-10-10 15:11 Ann Sanfedele wrote
so for me personally it is much more than simply keeping the whole
neighborhood
from being overrun with luxury highrises and college dorms and well
keep my building from going co-op or being demolished.
i
Of course, there's another side to it.
Around here the buildings that really should have been preserved were
demolished in the 50s 60s. The only significant building that has been
demolished recently was only significant because it was such a
horrendously BUTT UGLY eye-sore!
They did
On Oct 11, 2012, at 8:58 AM, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
Ditto what Frank wrote about Toronto, btw - I'm watching how fast the
high rise is going up at Astor Place as I pretty much pass there everyday.
A couple of nights ago Letterman was talking about how your mayor has said that
NYC doesn't
on 2012-10-11 6:58 Ann Sanfedele wrote
Efficient urban density sounds chillingly Orwellian to me.
it's just a straight ahead term, whereas in practice the more romantic term
landmark district could represent a more Orwellian outcome
cities are half machine/half organism; your neighborhood
From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Ann Sanfedele
the on topic aspect is that I took all the photos in my Back In the Day
Calendar with my old Pentax Kx'en. Except for one taken in 1971 with a
RICOH(!)
This was in todays NY times (at least the online version) I'm right
on 2012-10-10 9:55 Ann Sanfedele wrote
This was in todays NY times (at least the online version)
I'm right in the middle of the area (7th st between 1st and 2nd ave)
breathing a sigh of relief
Steve -
I rent - and have lived here for 40 years. My rent has been fixed
because of my age and the fact that when we moved in it was under rent
control and as such, given my age, my rent will never go up. Good thing
or I'd be in a homeless shelter or worse. For my landlord's sake, there
On Oct 10, 2012, at 3:13 PM, steve harley wrote:
on 2012-10-10 9:55 Ann Sanfedele wrote
This was in todays NY times (at least the online version)
I'm right in the middle of the area (7th st between 1st and 2nd ave)
breathing a sigh of relief
Great news, Ann! Now you can be sure that your building won't become just a
memory of what used to be -- replaced with million collar condos.
Paul
On Oct 10, 2012, at 11:55 AM, Ann Sanfedele ann...@nyc.rr.com wrote:
the on topic aspect is that I took all the photos in my Back In the Day
--- Original Message ---
From: Bob W p...@web-options.com
Sent: October 10, 2012 10/10/12
To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List' pdml@pdml.net
Subject: RE: OT and not OT - Landmark Preservation in NYC
From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Ann Sanfedele
the on topic aspect is that I
Stan - if you find toe coordinates I'd be happy to - it could even be
some place I already have photos of. But if it is Just a block off
Broadway it's not near the UN. UN - east side, Broadway at the same
latitude is on the west side. roughly a mile away.
How neat that you live in an old
on 2012-10-10 15:11 Ann Sanfedele wrote
so for me personally it is much more than simply keeping the whole neighborhood
from being overrun with luxury highrises and college dorms and well keep my
building from going co-op or being demolished.
i understand your perspective, and suspected you
13 matches
Mail list logo
