Mike wrote:
Last two frames on the roll of EBX I put through were overlapped
by more than half. Anyone else had this problem?
Yes. On a roll of EBX frame No. 34 and 35 overlaps with about one sprocket hole. BTW
This was a roll that had been rewinded and reloaded at frame 10.
Pål
-
This is starting to get worrying - I was just about to order one, but
maybe I will wait to see what this means...
Rob
-Original Message-
From: Pål Jensen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 04 July 2001 13:01
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Overlapping frames on MZ-S
Mike wrote
From: Patrick White
John Francis wrote:
I've just got my first few rolls of film back from the MZ-S,
and on one roll frames 23 24 overlap by two sprocket holes
(a 36-exposure roll, before you ask the obvious question).
I'm curious, how fresh were the batteries?
I really meant
Tang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 25, 2001 4:49 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Overlapping frames on MZ-S
Surely on a camera like the MZ-S, you'd expect it to be able
to automatically rewind the film when it reaches the end,
right? If you're expected to prod
John Francis wrote:
I've just got my first few rolls of film back from the MZ-S,
and on one roll frames 23 24 overlap by two sprocket holes
(a 36-exposure roll, before you ask the obvious question).
I'm curious, how fresh were the batteries? I had problems with overlapping
frames
needs attention.
Len
---
-Original Message-
From: Francis Tang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 25, 2001 4:49 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Overlapping frames on MZ-S
Surely on a camera like the MZ-S, you'd expect it to be able
Surely if you know your camera, you can feel the gears
stripping themselves out. Then you can stop what
you're doing and wind the film back. I have never had
a problem with not getting an extra photo anyway, on
all my cameras SLR or non-SLR. And I have never
stripped the gears out. I think it is
-Original Message-
From: mike wilson [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 25, 2001 4:20 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Overlapping frames on MZ-S
Hi,
Sorry for the delay replying, but I'm on the no-mail option and
the archives are running approximately three
Routinely getting extra frames is nice but suppose that you get a roll
that
is just a bit shorter than normal and you only have 36 1/2 frames. The
modern cameras would have no problem with this but some older cameras will
strip their gears when a person tries to advance a frame past the end
On Tue, Jun 26, 2001 at 12:25:35AM +0300, Philippe Trottier wrote:
If the camera breaks it need to be fixed, or the user need to be fixed for
trying to
stretch a film.. I always had the extra frame (I usually blank shoot it) and
if there
is tension in the middle of the frame. just press the
- Original Message -
From: Francis Tang
Surely on a camera like the MZ-S, you'd expect it to be able
to automatically rewind the film when it reaches the end, right?
If you're expected to prod the rewind button when you reach the
end, then doesn't that defeat the purpose of the
Surely on a camera like the MZ-S, you'd expect it to be able to
automatically rewind the film when it reaches the end, right? If you're
expected to prod the rewind button when you reach the end, then doesn't
that defeat the purpose of the auto-rewind feature?
Hi Frank,
I think I'd expect (and
Sounds like the camera tried to get an extra frame or two out of the roll.
How many exposures did you get?
Len
---
-Original Message-
From: mike wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2001 5:26 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Overlapping frames on MZ-S
13 matches
Mail list logo
