The flip comment would be: "As well you should!" But on reflection I
have to ask why. It's not
at all bad. Not enough Camera movement? (I couldn't resist I'm sorry).
frank theriault wrote:
I despise this photo:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2457638
But I'm posting it anyway. Co
You've every reason to dislike it, Frank, although I do think despise may
be a little over reactive ;-))
First, it's a cliche subject. Every jamoke with a long lens has something
like this in their portfolio. There's nothing new or innovative here, and,
imo, you choice of focal length is all wro
possible worlds. The pessimist
fears it is true." -J. Robert Oppenheimer
From: "Shel Belinkoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: PAW: Window Washers
Date: Sun, 20 Jun 2004 08:23:07 -0700
You've every reason to dislik
SB> Sorry, Frank, this one just doesn't make it.
Sometimes it's better to know why it doesn't make it, like you wrote,
than just knowing it makes it :)
Nice critique Shel! I have enough of similar shots which would have
benefited from more thinking.
fra
this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist
fears it is true." -J. Robert Oppenheimer
From: "Peter J. Alling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: PAW: Window Washers
Date: Sun, 20 Jun 2004 07:47:39 -0400
The flip comment
Looking forward to your next!
Frantisek
OTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: frank theriault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: PAW: Window Washers
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 15:31:47 +0200
Looking forward to your next!
Frantisek
_
MSN Premium with Virus Guard and Fire
7 matches
Mail list logo
