Re: PAW: Pretty Lady

2004-10-24 Thread Paul Stenquist
Thanks Frank. There's nothing like a long lens nearly wide open to ensure good bokeh. Hard to miss with that kind of combination. Paul On Oct 24, 2004, at 12:54 PM, frank theriault wrote: On Sat, 23 Oct 2004 15:59:12 -0400, Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Decided to spend a few minutes

Re: PAW: Pretty Lady

2004-10-24 Thread frank theriault
On Sat, 23 Oct 2004 15:59:12 -0400, Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Decided to spend a few minutes trying out the FA 80-320/4.5-5.6 that I > bought this week. I know it's not highly rated -- it's obviously a > consumer zoom -- but I'm rather pleased with it. I shot people walking > down

Re: PAW: Pretty Lady

2004-10-24 Thread Raimo K
://www.uusikaupunki.fi/~raikorho - Original Message - From: "Paul Stenquist" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, October 23, 2004 11:34 PM Subject: Re: PAW: Pretty Lady > It's not all that soft, considering that the lady is walking rapidly

Re: PAW: Pretty Lady

2004-10-23 Thread Keith Whaley
imo K - Original Message - From: "Shel Belinkoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, October 23, 2004 11:10 PM Subject: RE: PAW: Pretty Lady The lens has a nice, soft quality about it. I like that, and the bokeh in this pic looks pretty decent as w

Re: PAW: Pretty Lady

2004-10-23 Thread Paul Stenquist
ions. > Paul On Oct 23, 2004, at 4:25 PM, Raimo K wrote: Yeah, soft is correct... no matter who swears by this lens. The girl is soft, too. All the best! Raimo K - Original Message - From: "Shel Belinkoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, O

Re: PAW: Pretty Lady

2004-10-23 Thread Paul Stenquist
al Message - From: "Shel Belinkoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, October 23, 2004 11:10 PM Subject: RE: PAW: Pretty Lady The lens has a nice, soft quality about it. I like that, and the bokeh in this pic looks pretty decent as well. She

Re: PAW: Pretty Lady

2004-10-23 Thread Keith Whaley
Raimo K - Original Message - From: "Shel Belinkoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, October 23, 2004 11:10 PM Subject: RE: PAW: Pretty Lady The lens has a nice, soft quality about it. I like that, and the bokeh in this pic looks pretty d

Re: PAW: Pretty Lady

2004-10-23 Thread Paul Stenquist
;[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, October 23, 2004 11:10 PM Subject: RE: PAW: Pretty Lady The lens has a nice, soft quality about it. I like that, and the bokeh in this pic looks pretty decent as well. Shel [Original Message] From: Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Decided to spend a f

Re: PAW: Pretty Lady

2004-10-23 Thread Paul Stenquist
Thanks Shel. I think it's a nice people lens. I ran into two couples I knew as well, so I shot a couple of portraits. They're just about exactly what I would want for that type of photography. I think they were at 120mm or so. Again, the bokeh looks quite good, considering that the background i

Re: PAW: Pretty Lady

2004-10-23 Thread Raimo K
ent: Saturday, October 23, 2004 11:10 PM Subject: RE: PAW: Pretty Lady > The lens has a nice, soft quality about it. I like that, and the bokeh in > this pic looks pretty decent as well. > > Shel > > > > [Original Message] > > From: Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTE

RE: PAW: Pretty Lady

2004-10-23 Thread Shel Belinkoff
The lens has a nice, soft quality about it. I like that, and the bokeh in this pic looks pretty decent as well. Shel > [Original Message] > From: Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Decided to spend a few minutes trying out the FA 80-320/4.5-5.6 that I > bought this week. I know it's not hi