2009/8/8 David J Brooks :
> Very nice.
>
> Dave
Thanks Dave.
Jostein
--
http://www.alunfoto.no/galleri/
http://alunfoto.blogspot.com
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above a
2009/8/9 Graydon :
>> Those heights are much more challenging than our little peak though...
>
> Everything is tradeoffs; your little peak isn't an active volcano.
Skews the balance further, afa I can see. :-)
I'd love to see an active volcano, though. I remember I flew over Etna
during a small e
2009/8/9 :
> ===
> Very interesting. Brave Family.
>
> Or nuts. Heh.
Heh.
--
http://www.alunfoto.no/galleri/
http://alunfoto.blogspot.com
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link
2009/8/8 mike wilson :
>
> Congrats indeed. I missed that it was a blogpost, therefore didn't need a
> URL...
Well I should have provided you folks with one none the less. Thanks
for bearing over with me.
> Probably, they get everyone on top the same way they do here
> http://pl.wikipedia.org/w/
2009/8/8 Bob Sullivan :
> Jostein,
> What a great adventure. They are precious photos and convey the
> enironment with beauty.
> Regards, Bob S.
Thanks Bob. :-)
Jostein
--
http://www.alunfoto.no/galleri/
http://alunfoto.blogspot.com
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.n
2009/8/8 John Sessoms :
> North Carolina has no snow capped peaks - maybe a little in the winter, but
> it doesn't linger more than a day or two.
>
> The highest mountain in NC is Mt. Mitchell at 6,684 feet (2,037 m). It's
> actually the highest in the whole Appalachian chain that stretches paralle
On Sun, Aug 09, 2009 at 11:18:27AM +0200, AlunFoto scripsit:
> 2009/8/8 Joseph McAllister :
> > Mt. Rainier - 4392 meters, 14,411 feet, 105 km or 65 miles to my south
> > linearly
> > Mt. Baker - 3286 meters, 10,781 feet 90 km or 56 miles to my north linearly
> > But I will never climb either one!
Thanks for the tip on the colour rendering, Christine.
I will keep it in mind when I get back to my desktop PC.
Jostein
2009/8/8 Christine Aguila :
> Those are great, Jostein, and I especially love the third one. Really nice
> there. Hard to tell about PP; the shots render a little blue on my
2009/8/8 Joseph McAllister :
> Mt. Rainier - 4392 meters, 14,411 feet, 105 km or 65 miles to my south
> linearly
> Mt. Baker - 3286 meters, 10,781 feet 90 km or 56 miles to my north linearly
> But I will never climb either one!
:-)
Those heights are much more challenging than our little peak tho
2009/8/8 Bob W :
> Very enjoyable - nice to trek through the snow like that. Our highest
> so-called mountain, Scafell Pike, is less than 1,000m. When I went to the
> top it was February and the snow was up to my hips, but it was very
> enjoyable - I imagine your trek would be even more so.
Thank
2009/8/8 Brian Walters :
> How on earth did they fit all of those people on the summit!?
A good squeeze, it was... :-)
Well actually, two of the four parties on the glacier are coming down.
But it was disappointingly crowded up there.
> My congratulations - a great effort.
Thanks. I will relay
Duh! forgot the link. :-(
Lucky escape that the blog is in my sig, but still stupid. Well if
anyone's still interested, here's the direct link to the post:
http://alunfoto.blogspot.com/2009/08/2469.html
Jostein
2009/8/8 mike wilson :
> AlunFoto wrote:
>
>> 4 images in a blogpost describing the ci
In a message dated 8/7/2009 2:48:13 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
alunf...@gmail.com writes:
4 images in a blogpost describing the circumstance.
I chose to bring the K-7 and the FA 43mm f/1.9 for this, and it proved
to be a very nice little combo, fitting into the front pocket of my
jacket (anor
On Aug 8, 2009, at 03:50 , mike wilson wrote:
Joseph McAllister wrote:
I live between to particularly lofty peaks here in the state of
Washington. On a good day (winter, day after a storm) I can see
them both clearly.
Mt. Rainier - 4392 meters, 14,411 feet, 105 km or 65 miles to my
sout
Joseph McAllister wrote:
I live between to particularly lofty peaks here in the state of
Washington. On a good day (winter, day after a storm) I can see them
both clearly.
Mt. Rainier - 4392 meters, 14,411 feet, 105 km or 65 miles to my south
linearly
Mt. Baker - 3286 meters, 10,781 fe
Brian Walters wrote:
On Fri, 07 Aug 2009 23:48 +0200, "AlunFoto" wrote:
4 images in a blogpost describing the circumstance.
I chose to bring the K-7 and the FA 43mm f/1.9 for this, and it proved
to be a very nice little combo, fitting into the front pocket of my
jacket (anorak).
How on ea
Very nice.
Dave
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 5:48 PM, AlunFoto wrote:
> 4 images in a blogpost describing the circumstance.
> I chose to bring the K-7 and the FA 43mm f/1.9 for this, and it proved
> to be a very nice little combo, fitting into the front pocket of my
> jacket (anorak).
>
> Drop me a hin
Jostein,
What a great adventure. They are precious photos and convey the
enironment with beauty.
Regards, Bob S.
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 4:48 PM, AlunFoto wrote:
> 4 images in a blogpost describing the circumstance.
> I chose to bring the K-7 and the FA 43mm f/1.9 for this, and it proved
> to be a
From: "Christine Aguila"
Those are great, Jostein, and I especially love the third one. Really nice
there. Hard to tell about PP; the shots render a little blue on my monitor,
but maybe there's lots of blue up there. :-) Our tallest peak in Illinois
is Charles Mound at 1,125 feet. We ju
Those are great, Jostein, and I especially love the third one. Really nice
there. Hard to tell about PP; the shots render a little blue on my monitor,
but maybe there's lots of blue up there. :-) Our tallest peak in Illinois
is Charles Mound at 1,125 feet. We just have mounds here in the Mi
I live between to particularly lofty peaks here in the state of
Washington. On a good day (winter, day after a storm) I can see them
both clearly.
Mt. Rainier - 4392 meters, 14,411 feet, 105 km or 65 miles to my south
linearly
Mt. Baker - 3286 meters, 10,781 feet 90 km or 56 miles to my
>
> 4 images in a blogpost describing the circumstance.
> I chose to bring the K-7 and the FA 43mm f/1.9 for this, and it proved
> to be a very nice little combo, fitting into the front pocket of my
> jacket (anorak).
>
> Drop me a hint if the PP is off the mark. I don't trust this
> laptop scr
On Fri, 07 Aug 2009 23:48 +0200, "AlunFoto" wrote:
> 4 images in a blogpost describing the circumstance.
> I chose to bring the K-7 and the FA 43mm f/1.9 for this, and it proved
> to be a very nice little combo, fitting into the front pocket of my
> jacket (anorak).
>
How on earth did they fit
AlunFoto wrote:
4 images in a blogpost describing the circumstance.
I chose to bring the K-7 and the FA 43mm f/1.9 for this, and it proved
to be a very nice little combo, fitting into the front pocket of my
jacket (anorak).
Drop me a hint if the PP is off the mark. I don't trust this laptop scr
24 matches
Mail list logo
