On 27 Feb 2003 at 11:03, Sylwester Pietrzyk wrote:
on 27.02.03 10:32, Rob Studdert at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I guess: press it once and a white balance offset will be set that will be
applied to subsequent captured images. Welcome to the world of direct digital
image capture.
For
After looking at some pictures of the *ist-D on DPReview I rather
think it is for allowing the camera to communicate with ones computer
when it is necessary to upload images.
On the majority of digital cameras there is a 'play' mode and one has to
switch the camera into that mode before it will
I think it shows a computer. Thus, it is probably a
USB hook up, maybe???
--- Iren Henry Chu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear all,
I notice that there is a strange button at the left
side of the front body
of *ist-D, just above the MF-AFC-AFS switch. The
marking is a rectangle
nah, too small. The USB connection will be under the rubber flap on the
front right or rear right of the camera. It is definitely a button we
are all talking about.
Cheers
Shaun
Steve Pearson wrote:
I think it shows a computer. Thus, it is probably a
USB hook up, maybe???
--- Iren Henry Chu
No, it is a button, not a connector.
I was thinking it might control some momentary change in the viewfinder but
my imagination won't take me any further.
stan
=
on 2/26/03 11:38 PM, Steve Pearson at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think it shows a computer. Thus, it is probably a
USB hook
Thanks everyone for your help. You guys are great! I have checked with
another FA*200 and mine is indeed faulty. Thx again!! :)
regards,
Alan Chan
_
MSN 8 with e-mail virus protection service: 2 months FREE*
Alan Chan wrote:
I promise this will be my last question regarding my FA*200/2.8. :)
When the focus ring was shifted from MF to AF, it will rotate for certain
amount before it was locked into position. However, as I rotate the focus
ring (AF position), the distance scale rotates too. I
I did not watch the video, but I can describe how my FA*200/f2.8 behaves:
- When switching from MF to AF, the focus ring will rotate a certain
amount until it locks into position. During this unlocked rotation the
distance scale does not rotate. It only rotates (driven by the motor in
the
My 200 works perfectly on my LXs.
Vic
-Original Message-
From: Alan Chan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, December 28, 2002 11:48 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Strange FA*200 problem, or not a problem?
I promise this will be my last question regarding my FA*200/2.8. :)
Yeah, right.
When the focus
You're one unlucky dude.
Okay before I sent this sxxker back to BH, I need more feedbacks from you
guys...
2 faulty FA135 3 FA*200 in a roll, not bad huh!! This time will be it. No
more. Have had anough. :(
regards,
Alan Chan
If it is any consolation, Alan, you are not paranoid. Pentax IS out to
get you. :-)
On Sunday 29 December 2002 05:19 am, Alan Chan wrote:
You're one unlucky dude.
Okay before I sent this sxxker back to BH, I need more feedbacks
from you guys...
2 faulty FA135 3 FA*200 in a roll, not bad
If it is any consolation, Alan, you are not paranoid. Pentax IS out to
get you. :-)
All right, I am sorry that I hate the LX so much, and badmouthing it all the
time, but pls, pls don't do this to me! You win Pentax, LX IS GREAT AND I
LIKE IT ALOT!!! IT IS THE BEST CAMERA EVER, MIGHTY LX!!!
Not I.
Brad
- Original Message -
From: arkibladt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, October 27, 2002 10:26 AM
Subject: Strange Pentax posting
Hi list
Did any of you get a mail like this (It's strange since I'm not subscibing
to any yahoo list/group):
You cannot
Yes. Ralf Englemann was an active member of the group several years ago, and then
started hiw own on Yahoo. There are a number of people here who are on both groups. He
would seem to just be letting people here know what's going on there.
BR
-Original Message-
From: arkibladt
Anyone else having strange problems with the list?
None so far, but the traffic seems unusually light (so maybe I AM having so
problems?).
Lukasz
On Thu, 8 Aug 2002, William Robb wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Ayash Kanto Mukherjee
Subject: Re: Strange Canadian Customs
So, no sales tax, tariff, administrative fees for new items or
is it the
country from where the item is coming matters?
What is administrative fees
Yes, probably. I already have one of those, but also with a black bottom
plate. They are easy to recognize :-) . A probably ugly chrome MX with new
black top and bottom plates. It works perfectly, and I have only payed 40
USD for it, after selling some lenses that came with it.
Regards
Anders
On Fri, 1 Mar 2002 15:44:31 +0100 (Europa rodkowa (czas stand.)), Artur Ledóchowski
wrote:
Check out this pic: http://fototok.art.pl/photo.php?pe57
The picture is not showing up on this end
Later,
Gary
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to
...
Greetz
Artur
---Original Message---
Subject: Re: Strange bokeh on 80-200 f/4,7-5,6
Care to try again?
Artur Ledóchowski wrote:
Check out this pic: http://fototok.art.pl/photo.php?pe57
The picture is not showing up on this end
What the *%$%#!! The link is wrong...
Here's the right
I agree 100% with William from Utah. Don't throw away your flash though,
because it is fine with older cameras with a mechanical trigger switch.
Donate it to someone with a camera like that and you made two persons
happy:-)
Frits Wüthrich
Timothy Sherburne wrote:
Thanks, all. Since that's the
Of course; don't confuse junk box with trash can. I'm sure we've all got
one of these: a box filled with bits and pieces of gear that we really don't
use any more, but can't bear to throw out.
Actually, I've got many: a couple filled with old computer parts, cables,
drives, fans, disks,
Thanks, all. Since that's the second email basically stating the same thing,
I will now relegate the old flash to the junk box. Not that I really needed
it anyway...
t
On 12/15/01 6:20 PM, William Johnson wrote:
Hi,
I've had the same problems with an old Vivitar 2800. On some older
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This is probably wishful thinking but, if it is the shutter or the mirror,
is it possible that long storage slowed either of them down and a little
re-use will limber them up?
Yes, I think it is possible. The shutter speeds on the ME Super are
electronic, but I
Hi All,
Second roll turned out the same as the first. Looks like the shutter only
works in the middle ranges. Just sent a message to the seller-maybe he can
suggest a remedy.
I can see, after using this ME Super ever so briefly, the appeal of
it-never thought I'd see a 35mm SLR more compact
Dan Scott wrote:
Hi,
My retro-photographic experience is still puzzling me. The ME Super I
received yesterday now lights up in the viewfinder thanks to the advice of
some list members (turn the batteries around). But now, after having run
a roll through it, I am confused again. What
Dan Scott wrote:
What could be causing a black band to run down one of the long
sides of the print?
Hi Dan,
Do the shutter curtains on this body run vertically? Looks a lot like flash
pictures that were taken at a shutter speed faster than the X-sync (assuming
your problem shots were taken
Could it be a slow mirror?
- Original Message -
From: Dan Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 01, 2001 2:14 PM
Subject: Strange ME Super prints
Hi,
My retro-photographic experience is still puzzling me. The ME Super I
received yesterday now lights up in
Dan,
Pure speculation, but is the mirror up at the right time?
Regards, Bob S.
Dan wrote:
My retro-photographic experience is still
puzzling me. The ME Super I received
yesterday now lights up in the viewfinder
thanks to the advice of some list members
(turn the batteries around). But
A slow mirror would put the black band on the bottom of the image, not the
top.
I suspect the 2 shutter blade sets (open and close) are having problems.
- Original Message -
From: Cy Galley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 01, 2001 1:09 PM
Subject: Re: Strange
Hi Bob Cy,
Don't know. The mirror appears to be hitting the foam everytime I trip the
shutter, but I can't gauge if it is too fast or too slow. The foam looks
fine. The mirror has a little dust on it and, possibly, may sit a fraction
of a millimeter higher on one side in the down position but
Simular to what Bill suggested, take the camera, a flash, and no lens into
a dark room. Set it to 1/125, open the back, and fire at the wall, and if
it's working right you should see a full 35mm frame when the flash fires.
If it's too quick close your eyes and you should see the image burned
- Original Message -
From: "Wim H.H. van Heugten" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, January 07, 2001 1:17 PM
Subject: Re: Strange Pentax Skylight Filter
You have something special at hand! No serious, this filter was
only offered
by Asahi Pentax (AFAIK).
- Original Message -
From: "ToddEStan" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, January 07, 2001 8:50 PM
Subject: Re: Strange Pentax Skylight Filter
Thanks for the reply. I thought that the curved filter might have
something to do with the ghostless label
Chris Brogden wrote:
On Sun, 7 Jan 2001, ToddEStan wrote:
Thanks for the reply. I thought that the curved filter might have
something to do with the ghostless label on it.
I tried to use that filter once to take some shots of supernatural
manifestations. Man, was I disappointed.
You have something special at hand! No serious, this filter was only offered
by Asahi Pentax (AFAIK). It avoids inner reflections in the lens compared to
using a flat filter. It is most effective with short focal lengths. It has
no magnifying power at all and can be used in any case where you
Thanks for the reply. I thought that the curved filter might have
something to do with the ghostless label on it. I plan to keep it for when
I need a Skylight, since it seems to be SMC even if it's not labeled as such.
Todd
At 01:17 PM 1/7/01 +0100, you wrote:
You have something special at
On Sun, 7 Jan 2001, ToddEStan wrote:
Thanks for the reply. I thought that the curved filter might have
something to do with the ghostless label on it.
I tried to use that filter once to take some shots of supernatural
manifestations. Man, was I disappointed.
:)
chris
This message is from
Wellduh.
At 6:11 PM -06001/7/01, Chris Brogden caused thus to appear:
On Sun, 7 Jan 2001, ToddEStan wrote:
Thanks for the reply. I thought that the curved filter might have
something to do with the ghostless label on it.
I tried to use that filter once to take some shots of
301 - 339 of 339 matches
Mail list logo
