On Feb 16, 2012, at 16:21 , kwal...@peoplepc.com wrote:
I sold it a few years back complete with case, caps hood. I sold it after
not having used it since I went digital.
Probably sold it too cheap!
We all do. It's one of the photographer's curses.
Joseph McAllister
Lots of gear, not
bad news : its the worst pentax lens I have ever used with regards to
gemetric distortion. very high barrel distortion. the smck 20/4 fixed the
problem.
-
J.C.O'Connell
hifis...@gate.net
-
-Original Message-
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: Darren Addy pixelsmi...@gmail.com
Subject: Super-Multi-Coated Takumar 20mm f4.5 - thoughts?
I've been researching this lens a bit, and it seems that even though
it was made for years and years
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: JC O'Connell hifis...@gate.net
Subject: RE: Super-Multi-Coated Takumar 20mm f4.5 - thoughts?
bad news : its the worst pentax lens I have ever used with regards to
gemetric distortion. very
...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
kwal...@peoplepc.com
Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2012 7:22 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Super-Multi-Coated Takumar 20mm f4.5 - thoughts?
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: JC O'Connell hifis
Message-
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of JC
O'Connell
Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2012 8:11 PM
To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List'
Subject: RE: Super-Multi-Coated Takumar 20mm f4.5 - thoughts?
nope, its just a very early very wide very bad design
by pentax
6 matches
Mail list logo
