Re: UBERdigicam, some meanderings from Wheatfield Willie

2001-09-26 Thread Chris Brogden
On Tue, 25 Sep 2001, William Robb wrote: > The funny thing is, I am much more accepting of digital as a colour > medium. I think it could easily replace colour film eventually. And, > frankly, I wouldn't care. I would transfer to Automotives. Yeah, I can definitely see digital take over the colo

Re: UBERdigicam, some meanderings from Wheatfield Willie

2001-09-26 Thread Len Paris
- Original Message - From: "Paul Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 12:16 AM Subject: Re: UBERdigicam, some meanderings from Wheatfield Willie > That is a quite impressive camera, its quite large. It definately

RE: UBERdigicam, some meanderings from Wheatfield Willie

2001-09-26 Thread Matamoros, Cesar A.
comments below > From: Len Paris [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Subject: Re: UBERdigicam, some meanderings from Wheatfield Willie > > - Original Message - > From: "Paul Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: UBERdigicam, some meanderings from

RE: UBERdigicam, some meanderings from Wheatfield Willie

2001-09-26 Thread John Francis
> I do have questions, is there a theoretical limit to pixel > count/image depth/capture rate using known physics? > How does it compare to the theoretical limit for film, on a > straight square inch to square inch scale, using as close to > comparable parameters as possible? Yes, there is a limi

Re: UBERdigicam, some meanderings from Wheatfield Willie

2001-09-26 Thread Anthony Farr
- Original Message - From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (snip) > I do have questions, is there a theoretical limit to pixel > count/image depth/capture rate using known physics? > (snip) Sometime about 1988-90 I was discussing digital resolution with the SEM (Scanning Electron Micr