Re: Vivitar Flashes

2001-04-30 Thread petit miam
Ouch, might as well stick a paperclip in a power-point. > > That sounds quite conservative. > > Some flashes have trigger voltages of 150V and up. > > I have one that triggers at 240V. > > TTYL, DougF __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Auctions - buy the

Re: Vivitar Flashes

2001-04-29 Thread PAUL STENQUIST
I got knocked on my butt when I touched the frayed power cord of my Honeywell Strobonar 882 with wet hands. It uses that 500+ volt Eveready 497 battery, but I don't know what the trigger voltage is. I generally use the old Honeywell potato masher only with my Mamiya C220 or as a slave, but I've be

Re: Vivitar Flashes

2001-04-29 Thread David A. Mann
Jeff Tokayer writes: > That sounds quite conservative. > Some flashes have trigger voltages of 150V and up. Yes, I'd consider 40 volts to be pretty safe provided its dry :) I've had a few minor tingles off 50V DC with sweaty hands but I don't think I've ever felt 40V. I keep the hell clear

Re: Vivitar Flashes

2001-04-28 Thread Todd Stanley
I've seen as high as 600V. Most are about 150V. Don't have to worry about it as long as you don't complete the circuit between the contacts. Todd At 11:51 PM 4/28/01 -0400, you wrote: >On Sat, 28 Apr 2001 22:46:13 -0400, Jeff Tokayer wrote: > >> That sounds quite conservative. >> Some flashes

Re: Vivitar Flashes

2001-04-28 Thread Jeff Tokayer
Make sure you ground the flash before using it (?) Jeff - Original Message - From: "Doug Franklin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, April 28, 2001 11:51 PM Subject: Re: Vivitar Flashes > On Sat, 28 Apr 2001 22:46:13 -0400, Jeff T

Re: Vivitar Flashes

2001-04-28 Thread Doug Franklin
On Sat, 28 Apr 2001 22:46:13 -0400, Jeff Tokayer wrote: > That sounds quite conservative. > Some flashes have trigger voltages of 150V and up. I have one that triggers at 240V. TTYL, DougF - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follo

Re: Vivitar Flashes

2001-04-28 Thread Gerald F. Cermak
t; [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > > Lewis, Gerald > > Sent: Friday, April 20, 2001 3:02 PM > > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > > Subject: RE: Vivitar Flashes > > > > > > I know that this was written up in Pop Photo a > > coupole of years

RE: Vivitar Flashes

2001-04-20 Thread Len Paris
Thanks, Ken. I'd hate to see someone make a mistake and damage their camera. Len --- > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ken Archer > Sent: Friday, April 20, 2001 9:14 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subje

Re: Vivitar Flashes

2001-04-20 Thread Ken Archer
That pretty much says it a. Len Paris wrote: > > Here's a URL for info on flash trigger voltages. I believe that > this is a very reliable source. You can read this and decide for > yourself. > > http://www.smu.edu/~rmonagha/mf/flash.html > > Len > --- > > - > This message is from th

RE: Vivitar Flashes

2001-04-20 Thread Doug Franklin
Hi Jerry, On Fri, 20 Apr 2001 14:02:29 -0600, Lewis, Gerald wrote: > I know that this was written up in Pop Photo a coupole of years ago, but has > anyone ever really had their IC fried using an older strobe? Is the any > VERIFIABLE instance of this happening? I've never had my camera fry, but

RE: Vivitar Flashes

2001-04-20 Thread Len Paris
Here's a URL for info on flash trigger voltages. I believe that this is a very reliable source. You can read this and decide for yourself. http://www.smu.edu/~rmonagha/mf/flash.html Len --- - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and foll

RE: Vivitar Flashes

2001-04-20 Thread Len Paris
M > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > Subject: RE: Vivitar Flashes > > > I know that this was written up in Pop Photo a > coupole of years ago, but has > anyone ever really had their IC fried using an older > strobe? Is the any > VERIFIABLE instance of this happening?

Re: Vivitar Flashes

2001-04-20 Thread Cy Galley
o: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, April 20, 2001 8:37 AM Subject: RE: Vivitar Flashes > At 10:17 AM 4/19/01 -0700, you wrote: > >The Vivitar 285HV is a workhorse of a flash. The 283, if one of the older > >models, could fry some modern cameras. > > Len, > Cou

RE: Vivitar Flashes

2001-04-20 Thread B. K. Lane Sr.
At 10:17 AM 4/19/01 -0700, you wrote: >The Vivitar 285HV is a workhorse of a flash. The 283, if one of the older >models, could fry some modern cameras. Len, Could you please explain why it could fry some modern cameras? I dont want to get anything that would damage what I already have. Also I

Re: Vivitar Flashes

2001-04-19 Thread Bigtoeno2
I have and use the 285HV. Its a great machine, but it is definitely a beast. It even dwarfs my less than small KX, and makes my superprogram look like a toy. I like the auto capablities and the "calculator dial" on the side which keeps you from having to fumble around in your head with f-nu

Re: Vivitar Flashes

2001-04-19 Thread Ray Reese
I remember reading something on the internet (maybe on this site) about the "discharge voltage" on the V283 flash units being too high for modern electronic cameras. SOMETHING ABOUT FRYING THE CAMERA. SOUNDED SERIOUS. But, I also vaguely remember reading that it is only the oldest models of

RE: Vivitar Flashes

2001-04-19 Thread Paris, Leonard
The Vivitar 285HV is a workhorse of a flash. The 283, if one of the older models, could fry some modern cameras. I'd pass on the 283 and if the 285HV is in good condition, with a decent price, it will serve you well. Just go to KEH and some other used equipment sites (Cameta Camera comes to min