Bob W-PDML wrote:
Yes, and people react better to it than to a honking great slr.
Try a bright red K-r or a white K-x. People love them and will smile
when they see them just because they are so cute.
--
Larry Colen l...@red4est.com (postbox on min4est) http://red4est.com/lrc
--
PDML
Yes, and people react better to it than to a honking great slr.
> On 18 Jul 2016, at 13:36, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
>
> Lovely stuff!
>
> I'm finding the M/M-D typ 262 very easy to get used to. They just work … get
> out of the way and let you see. They may be the ultimate digital Ms. :-)
>
How about, Tootsie?:)
J
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jul 18, 2016, at 11:30 AM, Bob W-PDML wrote:
>
> Thanks. Just don't call me Pop, son.
>
>> On 18 Jul 2016, at 17:14, John wrote:
>>
>> It's the same as the number of licks it takes to get to the center of a
>> Tootsie-Roll Pop.
>
> --
> PDM
Thanks. Just don't call me Pop, son.
> On 18 Jul 2016, at 17:14, John wrote:
>
> It's the same as the number of licks it takes to get to the center of a
> Tootsie-Roll Pop.
>
>
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from t
Ask John Powers.
On July 17, 2016 10:15:17 AM PDT, Bob W-PDML wrote:
>Another small gallery on a hot day in Olde London Towne. The last
>you'll see from me for a while as I have to go back to work tomorrow
>:0(
>
>It's been fun getting used to this camera.
>
>http://www.web-options.com/T262e/
>
It's the same as the number of licks it takes to get to the center of a
Tootsie-Roll Pop.
--
Science - Questions we may never find answers for.
Religion - Answers we must never question.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE
Not sure, but I've heard that "one swallow does not a summer make."
J
- Original Message -
From: "Godfrey DiGiorgi"
To: "PDML"
Sent: Monday, July 18, 2016 5:35:03 AM
Subject: Re: How many swallows make a summer?
Lovely stuff!
I'm finding th
Lovely stuff!
I'm finding the M/M-D typ 262 very easy to get used to. They just work … get
out of the way and let you see. They may be the ultimate digital Ms. :-)
G
(I need to bring Felipe to London when it's hot there …)
> On Jul 17, 2016, at 10:15 AM, Bob W-PDML wrote:
>
> Another small
London - the capital of the world... So is New York or Paris, naturally...
Can you postpone going back to work for, let's say, two more galleries
such as this?
Boris
On Sun, Jul 17, 2016 at 7:15 PM, Bob W-PDML wrote:
> Another small gallery on a hot day in Olde London Towne. The last you'll se
There are proposals for a quantum of time that would provide the
basis for a fastest process:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chronon
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 6:26 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
> I just realized that they missed an opportunity. Rather than a soda bottle,
> they could have used a bottle of
I just realized that they missed an opportunity. Rather than a soda
bottle, they could have used a bottle of cheap wine. Then each frame
would be pico de gallo.
On 12/14/2011 3:23 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
On 12/14/2011 2:40 PM, Igor Roshchin wrote:
Frank, no, there are processes that are d
On 12/14/2011 2:40 PM, Igor Roshchin wrote:
Frank, no, there are processes that are done on a faster time scale.
There are attosecond lasers , that are capable producing ~80 attosecond
pulses. (1 attosecond is 10^-18 s - 0.000 000 000 000 000 001 s)
As of 2010, the shortest time interval meas
Frank, no, there are processes that are done on a faster time scale.
There are attosecond lasers , that are capable producing ~80 attosecond
pulses. (1 attosecond is 10^-18 s - 0.000 000 000 000 000 001 s)
As of 2010, the shortest time interval measured is 12 attoseconds.
This is at least 1000-10
> From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
> knarftheria...@gmail.com
>
> 'Cause any more would just be extravagant. (and probably theoretically
> impossible - I'm thinking that time can't be divided into smaller
> increments)
>
that's probably why you're no longer
From: Bruce Walker
Awesome. With just $250,000 of stuff, we'll be able to create photos
that appear to have been made using expensive studio lighting.
I can't wait.
I expect B&H will offer a rebate.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
From: Mark Roberts
Would one TRILLION frames per second be sufficient?
http://news.cnet.com/8301-11386_3-57342136-76/shutter-speed-demon-camera-takes-trillion-frames-per-second/
Does it have high-speed sync?
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_
'Cause any more would just be extravagant. (and probably theoretically
impossible - I'm thinking that time can't be divided into smaller increments)
cheers,
frank
--- Original Message ---
From: Mark Roberts
Sent: December 13, 2011 12/13/11
To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
Subject: How many fps
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 9:14 PM, P. J. Alling
wrote:
> Well since you put it that way, however it looks like you put more thought
> into it than the reporter did. I suspect that there are a lot of things he
> didn't really understand, which doesn't help my understanding at all.
I've been the sc
On 12/13/2011 8:59 PM, Matthew Hunt wrote:
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 8:46 PM, P. J. Alling
wrote:
WWhttp://news.cnet.com/8301-11386_3-57342136-76/shutter-speed-demon-camera-takes-trillion-frames-per-second/
I expect that this is just bad reporting, since the reporter, makes the
truly astoundin
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 8:46 PM, P. J. Alling
wrote:
>> http://news.cnet.com/8301-11386_3-57342136-76/shutter-speed-demon-camera-takes-trillion-frames-per-second/
> I expect that this is just bad reporting, since the reporter, makes the
> truly astounding claim that you can make ultrasound recor
Awesome. With just $250,000 of stuff, we'll be able to create photos
that appear to have been made using expensive studio lighting.
I can't wait. :-)
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 4:38 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
> Would one TRILLION frames per second be sufficient?
> http://news.cnet.com/8301-11386_3-573
On 12/13/2011 4:41 PM, Bob W wrote:
Would one TRILLION frames per second be sufficient?
http://news.cnet.com/8301-11386_3-57342136-76/shutter-speed-demon-
camera-takes-trillion-frames-per-second/
--
Mark Roberts - Photography& Multimedia
www.robertstech.com
they're going to use it to photograph
On 12/13/2011 4:38 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Would one TRILLION frames per second be sufficient?
http://news.cnet.com/8301-11386_3-57342136-76/shutter-speed-demon-camera-takes-trillion-frames-per-second/
I expect that this is just bad reporting, since the reporter, makes the
truly astounding cla
On 13 December 2011 21:38, Mark Roberts wrote:
> Would one TRILLION frames per second be sufficient?
> http://news.cnet.com/8301-11386_3-57342136-76/shutter-speed-demon-camera-takes-trillion-frames-per-second/
Yeah, but did they still miss the decisive moment?
--
Eric
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss M
Darrel got a chuckle out of that one, Bob, but he did add "I don't think they
have that many euros!" Cheers, Christine
On Dec 13, 2011, at 3:41 PM, "Bob W" wrote:
>>
>> Would one TRILLION frames per second be sufficient?
>> http://news.cnet.com/8301-11386_3-57342136-76/shutter-speed-demon-
That's pretty cool. Thanks for posting. Cheers, Christine
On Dec 13, 2011, at 3:38 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
> Would one TRILLION frames per second be sufficient?
> http://news.cnet.com/8301-11386_3-57342136-76/shutter-speed-demon-camera-takes-trillion-frames-per-second/
>
>
> --
> Mark R
On 13/12/11, Mark Roberts, discombobulated, unleashed:
>Would one TRILLION frames per second be sufficient?
>http://news.cnet.com/8301-11386_3-57342136-76/shutter-speed-demon-camera-
>takes-trillion-frames-per-second/
Can't be that fussed about it - was that a Sigma lens??
--
Cheers,
Cotty
>
> Would one TRILLION frames per second be sufficient?
> http://news.cnet.com/8301-11386_3-57342136-76/shutter-speed-demon-
> camera-takes-trillion-frames-per-second/
> --
> Mark Roberts - Photography & Multimedia
> www.robertstech.com
they're going to use it to photograph the individual euros f
Indeed the true way to compare flash light output is the amount of
energy in the flash of light.
This is independend of the way the light is directed, bundeled or difused.
The basic principle of this kind of flash guns is:
1. The voltage of the battery is boosted to a high voltage on a
guide number
Watt Seconds
Effective Watt Seconds
BCPS (Beam Candle Power Seconds)
16x the light. However its a largely irrelevant measure; GN is completely
dependant on any sort of reflectors, diffusers, zoom heads etc etc. So on a
white lightening, this figure changes with anything you put
On Dec 25, 2009, at 10:13 AM, Jack Davis wrote:
Don't know if this answers it, but.. Pg 89 in the 540 manual
includes the following: "Flash duration (1/2 peak each)--
(M1/1)flash; Approx. 1/1200 sec. (TTL) Fastest duration time:
Approx. 1/2 sec.".
Nope, that doesn't really help.
The p
Don't know if this answers it, but.. Pg 89 in the 540 manual includes the
following: "Flash duration (1/2 peak each)--(M1/1)flash; Approx. 1/1200 sec.
(TTL) Fastest duration time: Approx. 1/2 sec.".
Jack
--- On Fri, 12/25/09, Larry Colen wrote:
> From: Larry Colen
> Subject: How many wat
side of the outdoor experience
Rocky Mountain for the easily travelled mountain experience
Yosemite just because...
Kenneth Waller
http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f
- Original Message -
From: "Daniel J. Matyola"
Subject: Re: how many (US) national parks have you b
;Mark Roberts"
Subject: Re: how many (US) national parks have you been to?
Here's the list of all 58 U.S. National Parks:
Acadia
American Samoa
Arches
Badlands
Big Bend
Biscayne
Black Canyon of the Gunnison
Bryce Canyon
Canyonlands
Capitol Reef
Carlsbad Caverns
Channel Islands
Conga
Larry - just so you know -- Grand Canyon IS a National park ...
Re Burns - Too frustrating because you wish you could be in one of
those places ?
parts of it I found a bit ponderous but I really got into it... Didn't
like the very first one much.
I have to say I have no idea what Castle Cl
I'm not watching Ken Burns latest opus because I find it too frustrating. I
love national parks and have been to a few:
Acadia in Maine
Big Bend in Texas
Everglades in Florida
Hot Springs in Arkansas
Redwood in California
Then there's the National Monuments:
Castle Clinton in New York
George W
Bob Sullivan wrote:
Mark,
Thanks for the list. I've been to about 20, but am confused.
I've been to Vicksburg battelfield and thought it was a national park.
Regards, Bob S.
It's probably a National Military Park, National Battlefield Park, or
National Battlefield Monument, all of which are
On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 12:05 AM, ann sanfedele wrote:
> I'd have to go with a tie for 1st place between Arches/Canyonlands and
> Denali...
> But many of the places that are most vivid and loved are specific trails or
> visitas in natural areas that
> don't necessarily fall within park boundaries..
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 10:48 PM, Doug Brewer wrote:
> Mark Roberts wrote:
>>
>> ann sanfedele wrote:
>>
>>> So I didnt see Mark's post - just this reply --
>>> Doug - have you been to NONE?? or did you forget the list? or is your
>>> list the one under Mark's indent?
>>> boy am I confused!
>>
>>
Mark,
Thanks for the list. I've been to about 20, but am confused.
I've been to Vicksburg battelfield and thought it was a national park.
Regards, Bob S.
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 3:29 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
> Here's the list of all 58 U.S. National Parks:
>
> Acadia
> Badlands
> Carlsbad Caverns
I'd have to go with a tie for 1st place between Arches/Canyonlands and
Denali...
But many of the places that are most vivid and loved are specific trails
or visitas in natural areas that
don't necessarily fall within park boundaries... I'm so lucky to have
been able to visit all those beauti
John Sessoms wrote:
Here's an online link to the video series if anyone is interested...
http://www.pbs.org/nationalparks/watch-video/#872
Marnie aka Doe (KTEH is not my local PBS station, but I still
watch it frequently. Comes from San Jose).
Thanks. I'll try to watch it.
But, I
Only 10 for me. Time to do a road trip!
stan
On Oct 2, 2009, at 10:43 AM, ann sanfedele wrote:
Are any of you guys watching Ken Burns's thing on the National
parks? I'm liking it more and more
but thought the first show was the weakest and may have put people
off the series...
And relat
In a message dated 10/2/2009 7:36:27 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
jsessoms...@nc.rr.com writes:
Thanks. I'll try to watch it.
But, I thought of something ... Does the National Mall in DC count as a
National Park? If so, change my count to 40.
==
Different lists seem to say different
From: ann sanfedele
John Sessoms wrote:
> From: ann sanfedele
>
>> Are any of you guys watching Ken Burns's thing on the National
>> parks? I'm liking it more and more
>> but thought the first show was the weakest and may have put people
>> off the series...
>>
>> And relative to that, how
Mark Roberts wrote:
ann sanfedele wrote:
So I didnt see Mark's post - just this reply --
Doug - have you been to NONE?? or did you forget the list? or is your
list the one under Mark's indent?
boy am I confused!
I posted the full list of all 58 parks.
Doug posted a list of 22 of them.
Pres
Here's an online link to the video series if anyone is interested...
http://www.pbs.org/nationalparks/watch-video/#872
Marnie aka Doe (KTEH is not my local PBS station, but I still watch it
frequently. Comes from San Jose).
Thanks. I'll try to watch it.
But, I thought of something ...
ann sanfedele wrote:
>So I didnt see Mark's post - just this reply --
>Doug - have you been to NONE?? or did you forget the list? or is your
>list the one under Mark's indent?
>boy am I confused!
I posted the full list of all 58 parks.
Doug posted a list of 22 of them.
Presumably these are the
So I didnt see Mark's post - just this reply --
Doug - have you been to NONE?? or did you forget the list? or is your
list the one under Mark's indent?
boy am I confused!
ann
Doug Brewer wrote:
Mark Roberts wrote:
Arches Big Bend Black Canyon of the Gunnison Bryce Canyon
Canyonlands Capi
Mark Roberts wrote:
Arches
Big Bend
Black Canyon of the Gunnison
Bryce Canyon
Canyonlands
Capitol Reef
Carlsbad Caverns
Glacier
Grand Canyon
Grand Teton
Great Smoky Mountains
Guadalupe Mountains
Hot Springs
Mammoth Cave
Mesa Verde
Petrified Forest
Redwood
Rocky Mountain
Saguar
ann sanfedele wrote:
Are any of you guys watching Ken Burns's thing on the National parks?
Haven't been watching it, but agree with the premise. :-)
And relative to that, how many National Parks have you been to?
Oh, geez, there's no way I could recall them all. At least most of the
one
Top 5
1. Yosemite (CA) - amazing.
2. Sequoia (CA) - for me, can't beat big trees.
3. Haleakala National Park (HI) - Turns out I hadn't been to Hawaii
Volcanoes National Park, but to a defunct volcano on Maui (sort of defunct).
But
the above, near the falls and stuff, is just beautiful. I
On Oct 2, 2009, at 14:40, ann sanfedele wrote:
Charles Robinson wrote:
I've probably just been to a handful - I'm recording the series on
my TiVo but haven't watched any of the episodes yet.
A friend of mine just notched up 500... for this year... on a
motorcycle. I'm envious of his
On 10/2/09, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
> Now, we should list our favorites.
Oh, man. That's tough. My top 5.
1. Ozark Scenic Riverways - I spent a lot of time canoing those
rivers. My only regret is that I didn't give a damn about photography
back then.
2. Antietam - Much better than Gettysbur
On Fri, Oct 02, 2009 at 04:29:05PM -0400, Mark Roberts wrote:
> Here's the list of all 58 U.S. National Parks:
Hmm - I've been to more than I thought ..
Not all that many, but still more than I estimated.
> Acadia
> Bryce Canyon
> Death Valley
> Kings Canyon
> Sequoia
> Yosemite
> Zion
--
Approximately 24 national parks, not counting national monuments.
More than I thought, less than I would like.
Marnie aka Doe :-)
-
We can't solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we
created them. Albert Einstein
--
P
On 10/2/09, ann sanfedele wrote:
> I linked to a list in a reply to one of you a few mins ago
>
> I just checked off Parks... been to tons more when one includes Monuments
> and forests
The National Forests are under the jurisdiction of the National Forest
Service. So they don't count. :P
--
In a message dated 10/2/2009 1:50:10 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
jo...@panix.com writes:
> Here's an online link to the video series if anyone is interested...
>
> http://www.pbs.org/nationalparks/watch-video/#872
>
> Marnie aka Doe (KTEH is not my local PBS station, but I still watch
wonderland of mountains, lakes and glaciers.
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 4:43 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
> A bunch of National Monuments that you need to check before counting them as
> NP's.
>
> Jack
>
> --- On Fri, 10/2/09, eactiv...@aol.com wrote:
>
>> From: eactiv...@aol.c
On Fri, Oct 02, 2009 at 03:37:35PM -0400, eactiv...@aol.com wrote:
> Here's an online link to the video series if anyone is interested...
>
> http://www.pbs.org/nationalparks/watch-video/#872
>
> Marnie aka Doe (KTEH is not my local PBS station, but I still watch it
> frequently. Comes fro
Thanks, Mark! I just re-counted from this list and found two more. Now a total
of 23.
Jack
--- On Fri, 10/2/09, Mark Roberts wrote:
> From: Mark Roberts
> Subject: Re: how many (US) national parks have you been to?
> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
> Date: Friday, Oc
A bunch of National Monuments that you need to check before counting them as
NP's.
Jack
--- On Fri, 10/2/09, eactiv...@aol.com wrote:
> From: eactiv...@aol.com
> Subject: Re: how many (US) national parks have you been to?
> To: pdml@pdml.net
> Date: Friday, October 2, 2009
On that official list, I have visited 33
Dan M
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 4:29 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
> Here's the list of all 58 U.S. National Parks:
>
> Acadia
> American Samoa
> Arches
> Badlands
> Big Bend
> Biscayne
> Black Canyon of the Gunnison
> Bryce Canyon
> Canyonlands
> Capitol Reef
> C
In a message dated 10/2/2009 1:17:51 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
ann...@nyc.rr.com writes:
Desjardins, Steve wrote:
>Not many. I tend to visit cities rather than go camping.
>
camping? I've hardly camped at any... hiked, yes... there are so many
lovely places
to stay in the parks and nea
On Fri, 2 Oct 2009 18:43:26 +0200 AlunFoto wrote:
>
>
>> And relative to that, how many National Parks have you been to? Possibly
>> some from the other side of the Pond
>> have more on their list than some of us who live here...
>
>I had to look up the list:
>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_
Here's the list of all 58 U.S. National Parks:
Acadia
American Samoa
Arches
Badlands
Big Bend
Biscayne
Black Canyon of the Gunnison
Bryce Canyon
Canyonlands
Capitol Reef
Carlsbad Caverns
Channel Islands
Congaree
Crater Lake
Cuyahoga Valley
Death Valley
Denali
Dry Tortugas
Evergla
Staying at the Ahwahnee is hardly cmping . . .
Dan
> Desjardins, Steve wrote:
>
>> Not many. I tend to visit cities rather than go camping.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link direct
Desjardins, Steve wrote:
Not many. I tend to visit cities rather than go camping.
camping? I've hardly camped at any... hiked, yes... there are so many
lovely places
to stay in the parks and near them that "fear of camping" shouldn't
keep you away. :-)
But I do remember ONE camping t
I linked to a list in a reply to one of you a few mins ago
I just checked off Parks... been to tons more when one includes
Monuments and forests
ann
eactiv...@aol.com wrote:
.
ann
http://annsan.smugmug.com
===
Yes, I am really enjoying it. Second episode made me cry. :-) I am
Well, including national historical sites, national monuments, etc:
Acadia
Alcatracz
Anacostia
Appalacian Trail
Arches
Badlands
Biscayne
Blue Ridge
Bryce
Canaveral
Canyonlands
Cape Cod
Cape Hattaras
Carlsbad
Castle Clinton
Death Vallyey
Delaware Water Gap
Denali
Devil's Tower
Edison
Eisenhower
Ell
John Sessoms wrote:
From: ann sanfedele
Are any of you guys watching Ken Burns's thing on the National
parks? I'm liking it more and more
but thought the first show was the weakest and may have put people
off the series...
And relative to that, how many National Parks have you been to?
Tom Cakalic wrote:
I've been to 31 official US National Parks. Probably double that if
you count National Monuments and such. Almost all the National Parks
in Alberta and British Columbia, CA, and 1 in Mexico.
true with me for Canada and Monuments too.
I find it mildly puzzling how concen
On 10/2/09, ann sanfedele wrote:
> ah ha -
>
> for you counters - I found a list googling that showed National parks... I
> think, Scott, you are counting some
> they call "historical Monuments" etc...
>
> The Blue Ridge isn't a National Park, nor is the WHite House...
I pretty much counted
Thanks for that list -- now I can start counting the monuments...
Some places I'd been to before they were made parks or monuments - my
parents towed me all over the place
when I was still in grade school.
AlunFoto wrote:
2009/10/2 ann sanfedele :
And relative to that, how many National
Boris Liberman wrote:
Probably just one - the Yosemite.
I wish I could at least visit the Yellowstone and that place where
Grand Canyon is, assuming it is a national park.
Boris
P.S. I've been to some National parks locally, but I reckon this does
not count ;-).
not for this quiz :)
Charles Robinson wrote:
On Oct 2, 2009, at 10:51, Charles Robinson wrote:
A friend of mine just notched up 500... for this year... on a
motorcycle. I'm envious of his freedom and ambition!
I should clarify that he's collected 500 stamps (in some sorta book,
I guess?) from parks. M
ah ha -
for you counters - I found a list googling that showed National
parks... I think, Scott, you are counting some
they call "historical Monuments" etc...
The Blue Ridge isn't a National Park, nor is the WHite House...
Here are all 58 by date created
http://tinyurl.com/y92recv
Here is m
In a message dated 10/2/2009 12:39:10 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
ann...@nyc.rr.com writes:
> A friend of mine just notched up 500... for this year... on a
> motorcycle. I'm envious of his freedom and ambition!
>
> -Charles
I'm impressedwith his talent for "fish stories", since there are
Not many. I tend to visit cities rather than go camping.
-Original Message-
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of ann
sanfedele
Sent: Friday, October 02, 2009 11:43 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: how many (US) national parks have you been to?
Charles Robinson wrote:
On Oct 2, 2009, at 10:43, ann sanfedele wrote:
Are any of you guys watching Ken Burns's thing on the National
parks? I'm liking it more and more
but thought the first show was the weakest and may have put people
off the series...
And relative to that, how many
Here's an online link to the video series if anyone is interested...
http://www.pbs.org/nationalparks/watch-video/#872
Marnie aka Doe (KTEH is not my local PBS station, but I still watch it
frequently. Comes from San Jose).
-
We can't solve pr
21 NP's and yes, I'm watching a good bit of it. Thus far, his work has always
been worth checking out.
Jack
--- On Fri, 10/2/09, ann sanfedele wrote:
> From: ann sanfedele
> Subject: how many (US) national parks have you been to?
> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
> Date: Friday, October 2, 20
In a message dated 10/2/2009 8:43:06 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
ann...@nyc.rr.com writes:
Are any of you guys watching Ken Burns's thing on the National parks?
I'm liking it more and more
but thought the first show was the weakest and may have put people off
the series...
And relative to
From: David J Brooks
I think i can safely say, none. Unless driving 22 miles on the Blue
ridge parkway counts. Thank god for the slow speed limits on that
road. Only time i caught up to Mark on my first trip to GFM.
According to nps.gov FAQ: http://www.nps.gov/blri/faqs.htm
Is the Blue Ridge P
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 1:53 PM, John Sessoms wrote:
> If my count is correct - 39.
40 is right out.
Dave
>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
> follow th
From: ann sanfedele
Are any of you guys watching Ken Burns's thing on the National parks?
I'm liking it more and more
but thought the first show was the weakest and may have put people off
the series...
And relative to that, how many National Parks have you been to?
Possibly some from the
I think i can safely say, none. Unless driving 22 miles on the Blue
ridge parkway counts. Thank god for the slow speed limits on that
road. Only time i caught up to Mark on my first trip to GFM.
Dave
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 12:29 PM, Drew wrote:
> Errr none I have only visited the States
They do.
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 12:07 PM, John Francis wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 02, 2009 at 10:51:10AM -0500, Charles Robinson wrote:
>> On Oct 2, 2009, at 10:43, ann sanfedele wrote:
>>
>>> Are any of you guys watching Ken Burns's thing on the National parks?
>>>
>>> I checked off 40 of the reporte
On Fri, Oct 02, 2009 at 10:51:10AM -0500, Charles Robinson wrote:
> On Oct 2, 2009, at 10:43, ann sanfedele wrote:
>
>> Are any of you guys watching Ken Burns's thing on the National parks?
>>
>> I checked off 40 of the reported 58 though I think there might be
>> more that I visited before t
I've been to 31 official US National Parks. Probably double that if
you count National Monuments and such. Almost all the National Parks
in Alberta and British Columbia, CA, and 1 in Mexico.
I find it mildly puzzling how concentrated the parks are in the
western half of the US. Maybe because lan
2009/10/2 ann sanfedele :
>
> And relative to that, how many National Parks have you been to? Possibly
> some from the other side of the Pond
> have more on their list than some of us who live here...
I had to look up the list:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_areas_in_the_United_States_Natio
Errr none I have only visited the States once... and I don't
think Austin Convention Centre is in a national park :-) I do however
live about 50 yards from the border of the new South Downs National Park
in the UK... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/South_Downs_National_Park
Cheers,
Dre
Probably just one - the Yosemite.
I wish I could at least visit the Yellowstone and that place where Grand
Canyon is, assuming it is a national park.
Boris
P.S. I've been to some National parks locally, but I reckon this does
not count ;-).
ann sanfedele wrote:
Are any of you guys watching
On Oct 2, 2009, at 10:51, Charles Robinson wrote:
A friend of mine just notched up 500... for this year... on a
motorcycle. I'm envious of his freedom and ambition!
I should clarify that he's collected 500 stamps (in some sorta book, I
guess?) from parks. Might be state parks, too - an
On 10/2/09, ann sanfedele wrote:
>
> I checked off 40 of the reported 58 though I think there might be more
> that I visited before they were made into parks.
The National Park service maintains more than just the 58 "parks". I
guess when you're making a TV show, you have to have limits. Here
- Original Message -
From: "ann sanfedele"
Subject: how many (US) national parks have you been to?
Are any of you guys watching Ken Burns's thing on the National parks?
I'm liking it more and more
but thought the first show was the weakest and may have put people off the
series...
On Oct 2, 2009, at 10:43, ann sanfedele wrote:
Are any of you guys watching Ken Burns's thing on the National
parks? I'm liking it more and more
but thought the first show was the weakest and may have put people
off the series...
And relative to that, how many National Parks have you been
AlunFoto wrote:
2009/5/20 Cotty :
On 19/5/09, Joseph McAllister, discombobulated, unleashed:
You are the only one in five hours. I'd like to wait 24 hours to
allow
the whole globe to check in. If no one does, it's yours for $25 plus
ship, ok?
Don't forget the Martians ;-)
No prob.
No, but CA/distortion is working with RAW.
I suppose we will have to wait for 3rd parties softwares to support
K-7 (and its corrections) before having a real good solution.
No, I don't expect Pentax Raw software to be suddenly very usable :(
2009/5/20 Margus Männik :
> OK, we can talk about those
OK, we can talk about those things now.
All those autocorrections are great for jpeg-shooters. I wouldn't
dispute about the effect (or effectiveness) as there's still no final
firmware. There's also raw-eaters league who rely rather on
post-processing. Have ANYONE seen the new bundled software
1 - 100 of 534 matches
Mail list logo
