on 11/09/03 3:29 PM, Cotty at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On 9/11/03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
>
>> Either way, it is too slow for someone who shoots rabid bursts at short
>> intervals.
> ...
> For comparison sake, I did a quick test with the D60.
> Total frames shot in
> one minute = 8 + 31 +
>
> Since all I've shot is field sports, I'll yield to those of you with more
> experience in motor sports. I recently shot a softball game with the *ist D
> and was surprised how quickly I got my timing back after 40 years.
It's very rare that you'll be in a position to run off multiple shots o
teland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, November 09, 2003 8:19 PM
Subject: Re: frame rates... again... (was: Re: my ist-D samples)
> My argument was for sequences in motor sports. I made no mention of field
> sports. I agree that football and basketball
ssage -
From: "Bill Owens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, November 09, 2003 3:03 PM
Subject: Re: frame rates... again... (was: Re: my ist-D samples)
> Maybe for certain uses, such as an imploding building. For sports such as
> football and
>
> I'll second that. A friend of mine shoots a lot of sequence shots for
> motocross, snowboarding, skateboarding, mountain biking, etc. It's not
> about capturing the one decisive moment--it's about showing a series of
> photos that capture the jump/stun
M
Subject: frame rates... again... (was: Re: my ist-D samples)
> Bill, What if you wanted to catch a sequence of a
> car going into the gravel trap, or a rider being
> ejected from his motorcycle? Can you shoot (on
> film) 5 frames in in one second (the time it takes
> for a spin to happ
ly, IMNHO, you'd be better off using
single frame mode and experience.
>
> Bill
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Malcolm Smith"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Sunday, November 09, 2003 4:13 AM
> Subject: RE: my ist-D sam
- Original Message -
From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Christian Skofteland"
> Subject: Re: my ist-D samples
>
>
>
> > > > I don't think this would be a good camera
for so
Bill Owens wrote an on topic and accurate observation:
> Actually, IMNHO, you'd be better off using single frame mode
> and experience.
Stop it! I'm trying to get a bit of film/digital usage argument going on
here!
Malcolm
- Original Message -
From: "Malcolm Smith"
Subject: RE: my ist-D samples
> > On Saturday, Nov 8, 2003, at 22:45 America/New_York, William
> > Robb wrote:
> >
> > > It will do 5 shots in rapid succession, then it kaks while
> > the buffer
>
- Original Message -
From: "Juey Chong Ong"
Subject: Re: my ist-D samples
> As an experiment, I set my *ist-D on continuous shooting and use a
> smaller JPEG size (L*) because I'm still using my old, slow 128MB cards
> and just held down the shutter release
Christian wrote:
LX and MX, I'd say that the operation of the ist-d
Same here!
the new interface (mainly, using the lens on "A"
and spinning a wheel to change aperture) was not a
Doing this myself Digitally with my Oly E10 but I would
like to go Pentax.
second-nature. The viewfinder is awesome, s
- Original Message -
From: "jmb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, October 27, 2003 10:09 PM
Subject: Re: my ist-D samples
>
> Enjoyed the pictures! Do you find the operation
of the dslr to be
> similar in feel
> and speed to an
- Original Message -
From: "Butch Black" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, October 27, 2003 12:17 PM
Subject: RE: my ist-D samples
> Nice images, especially the water lilies.
Thanks!
> I too noticed the highlights on
> the rear
14 matches
Mail list logo
