Has anyone experience of the 135 f2.8 A lens? How would users rate it for
portrait and landscape work?
I have an offer of a used version of this lens and was wondering how other
users would rate it.
Thanks,
Pat
. Actually I like
the Sears 135/2.8 I have better, and it's not great by
any means.
HTH
Don
-Original Message-
From: Pat Curran [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, November 28, 2004 8:24 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Rating for 135 F2.8 SMC A
Has anyone experience
- Original Message -
From: Don Sanderson
Subject: RE: Rating for 135 F2.8 SMC A
The general consensus, and I agree with it, is that this is one
of the worst Pentax 135s in both contrast and sharpness.
Much better is the M 135/3.5, a very sweet lens.
Even better is the SMC K 135/2.5
I have one!! It's mint! It's wonderful!
(It's the one that came in a Pentax velvet bag inside an LX box.)
;-)
Don
-Original Message-
From: William Robb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, November 28, 2004 8:39 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Rating for 135 F2.8 SMC
The general consensus, and I agree with it, is that this is one of
the worst Pentax 135s in both contrast and sharpness.
Yes, agreed. Sorry, Pat.
Much better is the M 135/3.5, a very sweet lens. Even better is
the SMC K 135/2.5 (NOT Takumar)
But I think that ~even~ the Takumar bayonet
: Rating for 135 F2.8 SMC A
Has anyone experience of the 135 f2.8 A lens? How would users rate it for
portrait and landscape work?
I have an offer of a used version of this lens and was wondering how other
users would rate it.
Thanks,
Pat
November 2004 1:56 AM
To: Don Sanderson
Subject: Re: Rating for 135 F2.8 SMC A
The general consensus, and I agree with it, is that this is one of the
worst Pentax 135s in both contrast and sharpness.
Yes, agreed. Sorry, Pat.
Much better is the M 135/3.5, a very sweet lens. Even better
7 matches
Mail list logo
