CS and RAW files from DL2
Unless the DL2 has been seriously downgraded, the buffer should hold five
frames regardless of card write speed.
-Aaron
That's the bit that's bothering me.
m
-Original Message-
From: mike wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subj: Re: Re: CS
On Apr 30, 2006, at 10:05 AM, mike wilson wrote:
The *istDL2 records up to five images (at “best” image quality in
6 megapixel JPEG format) or three images (in RAW format)
consecutively at a speed of approximately 2.8 frames per second,
allowing the user to capture a series of photos of th
n" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Sunday, April 30, 2006 4:07 PM
Subject: Re: Re: CS and RAW files from DL2
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 2006/04/30 Sun PM 02:53:53 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: CS and RAW files from DL2
On Apr 30, 2006, at
Aaron Reynolds wrote:
From Pentax.ca:
The *istDL2 records up to five images (at “best” image quality in 6 megapixel JPEG format) or three images (in RAW format) consecutively at a speed of approximately 2.8 frames per second, allowing the user to capture a series of photos of the subject’s mot
ron
-Original Message-
From: mike wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subj: Re: Re: CS and RAW files from DL2
Date: Sun Apr 30, 2006 11:33 am
Size: 2K
To:
>
> From: "Aaron Reynolds" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2006/04/30 Sun PM 03:11:00 GMT
> To: pentax-discuss@p
>
> From: "Aaron Reynolds" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2006/04/30 Sun PM 03:11:00 GMT
> To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> Subject: Re: Re: CS and RAW files from DL2
>
> Unless the DL2 has been seriously downgraded, the buffer should hold five
> frames reg
Unless the DL2 has been seriously downgraded, the buffer should hold five
frames regardless of card write speed.
-Aaron
-Original Message-
From: mike wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subj: Re: Re: CS and RAW files from DL2
Date: Sun Apr 30, 2006 10:58 am
Size: 2K
To:
> Fr
>
> From: Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2006/04/30 Sun PM 02:53:53 GMT
> To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> Subject: Re: CS and RAW files from DL2
>
> On Apr 30, 2006, at 3:23 AM, mike wilson wrote:
>
> >> One thing that does annoy m
> From: "Shel Belinkoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Why do you have to keep going into the menus? What are you changing, and
> why?
I mostly don't have to, I just am at the moment as I'm playing with it. On the
occasions where I have to, it's because the other user 8-))) has left it on a
settin
On Apr 30, 2006, at 3:23 AM, mike wilson wrote:
One thing that does annoy me and will no doubt cost me is that the
built in
flash is as bad as you would expect and I'll need to but an AF360Z
to get
any flash automation.
AF280T, 200T and 400T all work well with it.
But they do not do TTL
Interspersed
Shel
> [Original Message]
> From: mike wilson
> I don't think my similar opinion is going to change.
> It's a Hell of a lot of camera for the money but my
> LX will undoubtedly outlive it. I have a personal
> problem with non-mechanical cameras, being quite
> short sight
Interspersed
Shel
> [Original Message]
> From: mike wilson
> I don't think my similar opinion is going to change.
> It's a Hell of a lot of camera for the money but my
> LX will undoubtedly outlive it. I have a personal
> problem with non-mechanical cameras, being quite
> short sighted.
>
> From: "Peter Jordan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2006/04/30 Sun AM 08:04:13 GMT
> To:
> Subject: Re: CS and RAW files from DL2
>
> At the moment I'm still in "kid with new toy" mode, but do find that I'm
> taking lots more (bad)
nd so
forth, (workflow?).
Will try the download Godfrey suggested later today.
Thanks
Peter
- Original Message -
From: "Shel Belinkoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, April 29, 2006 10:04 PM
Subject: Re: CS and RAW files from DL2
Hi Godders,
Peter's
on" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, April 29, 2006 6:57 PM
Subject: Re: CS and RAW files from DL2
What do you think of the 2?
m
-
Email sent from www.ntlworld.com
Virus-checked using McAfee(R) Software
Visit www.ntlworld.com/security for more information
Hi Godders,
Peter's using CS, not CS2, so he's limited to ACR 2.4.
Shel
> [Original Message]
> From: Godfrey DiGiorgi
> I think the DL2 PEF files are the same format as DS, DL, DS2 PEF
> files. Camera Raw v3.3 rejects them because the camera descriptor is
> not in its internal list. I se
What plug-in did you download? AFAIK, there's no "plug-in" that allows you
to read DL2 files in Photoshop CS.
What you have to do is DL the latest version of Adobe DNG, convert the PEF
to DNG format, and then CS with Adobe Camera Raw 2.4 will open it.
Shel
> [Original Message]
> From: Peter Jo
I think the DL2 PEF files are the same format as DS, DL, DS2 PEF
files. Camera Raw v3.3 rejects them because the camera descriptor is
not in its internal list. I searched the Camera Raw binary with a hex
file editor and found "Pentax *ist DS2" (as well as the 'D', 'DS' and
'DL' models) list
>
> From: "Peter Jordan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2006/04/29 Sat PM 05:31:35 GMT
> To:
> Subject: CS and RAW files from DL2
>
> I've searched the archive and not found any post on this topic, so excuse me
> if this question has already been asked.
>
> Is there a way of getting CS to read i
19 matches
Mail list logo
