This realization was what made me get excited about digital. There's no
reason (that I know of) not to think that, not only is digital going to
approach film quality, it will eventually surpass it.
Until then, yes, digital (at least at any price I can dream of spending) is
a nifty thing for ni
Jody wrote:
> I like to take good photos, not crappy touristy shots.
Fair enough
> Also I like maximum control over my settings. That is
> why I use an SLR. I am glad some people still agree
> with me that you can't beat SLR.
I agree that at present SLRs from the big 4 (5?) manufacturers give
On Thu, 29 Mar 2001, petit miam wrote:
> Quoted from
> http://www.photographystore.com/Pages/camrabg.html
>
> "Pentax, Minolta and Olympus. I would lump all of
> these manufactures together. They are not really built
> to the same quality as Canon and Nikon. If you choose
> prime, fixed focal leng
>> "Pentax, Minolta and Olympus. I would lump all ofthese manufactures
together. They are not really builtto the same quality as Canon and Nikon. If
you chooseprime, fixed focal length lenses though they arecapable of superb
results. Remember I am looking forequipment capable of the absolu
4 matches
Mail list logo
