And some of them are more reliable to offset their lesser
expandability.
Perhaps, but my Compaq Presario has given me nothing but hxxx over the
years. Not to mention they chose to include the slowest HD and stupid
software modem. It wasn't even the cheap model by the time it was bought.
And
I had the Sigma 400/5.6 APO Macro in Pentax AF. Optically, it was a
first-rate lens in every respect. The build quality was good also. I
returned it within the 30-day return period because it didn't report
the proper aperture when used on a Super Program, and I was afraid
there would be further
At 06:11 AM 11/9/01 -0600, John Mustarde wrote:
But now Sigma reports they have discontinued production of that lens -
because they sell many more of their 135-400 and other long zooms than
the autofocus APO 400/5.6 Macro.
I noticed this recently. The upshot is that there are now no third
, November 09, 2001 8:07 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: I'm becoming disillusioned with Sigma
At 06:11 AM 11/9/01 -0600, John Mustarde wrote:
But now Sigma reports they have discontinued production of that lens -
because they sell many more of their 135-400 and other long zooms than
I missed the first part of this discussion. I have a couple of Sigma's-
the EX 50mm f2.8 macro and 14mm f3.5 - and they work fine. No
compatibility problems at all. I finally broke down and ordered the Sigma
70 - 200 f.28 as well, but have not recieved it yet.
If anything, I've had more
The only time it pays to buy a name brand computer is if you are a total
non-techie and haven't a clue what one end of a screwdriver is. Generally
what you get in a name brand is a little fuzzy security blanket without
knowing that since your computer can't be upgraded very much or at all you
6 matches
Mail list logo
