Again, thanks to all who took the time to look comment.
Seems this one either needs more PP'ing, or I have to go back and have
another crack at it sometime.
Given that this was taken on a scouting trip, I know which way I'm leaning.
Cheers,
Dave
On Dec 3, 2007 2:26 PM, Boris Liberman [EMAIL
Nice. Just enough detail in the weeds to see them.
Dave
On Nov 30, 2007 9:26 AM, David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
G'day All,
Another from this evening (a little more conventional this time, ~160KB):
http://www.arach.net.au/~savage/Misc/Images/K10D/_IGP9763.jpg
Cheers,
Dave
--
Paul,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nice composition. A tough exposure job here with the bright sky and dark
ground. I think you handled it about as well as you could in a single
exposure. A two exposure composite here might have been stunning.
Paul
Perhaps a plain ol' negative film would have
In a message dated 11/30/2007 11:36:26 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
David - what Jack said
ann
Jack Davis wrote:
Foreground area appears very murky on my monitor..of course. :)
I really can't see what the dark area holds, but a 'think' the bottom
might benefit
I'm not wild about multiple exposures when they're used to achieve a surreal
effect, although there can be situations where that kind of image is
appropriate. But when the technique is used to extend the dynamic range of the
camera to more closely approximate the eye I find that it's most
Always good to reply to yourself. It is interesting to note that
several have commented on the foreground being murky. On my monitor
it is dark, but just fine - no murkiness - I can see the details. Now my
monitor is
calibrated and I don't know about any others. It is not uncommon for
some
aa.my head has righted itself.
Pretty nice shot. The sky looks just a little blown - don't know if
that is recoverable or not.
--
Bruce
Friday, November 30, 2007, 6:26:18 AM, you wrote:
DS G'day All,
DS Another from this evening (a little more conventional this time, ~160KB):
DS
Foreground area appears very murky on my monitor..of course. :)
I really can't see what the dark area holds, but a 'think' the bottom
might benefit from a crop.
Tough exposure, for sure!
Jack
--- David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
G'day All,
Another from this evening (a little more
I like the composition, but it's a bit murky on my monitor.
David Savage wrote:
(Forgot the details)
G'day All,
Another from this evening (a little more conventional this time, ~160KB):
http://www.arach.net.au/~savage/Misc/Images/K10D/_IGP9763.jpg
K10D, FA 31mm f1.8 Ltd., 1/5, 1/8
(Forgot the details)
G'day All,
Another from this evening (a little more conventional this time, ~160KB):
http://www.arach.net.au/~savage/Misc/Images/K10D/_IGP9763.jpg
K10D, FA 31mm f1.8 Ltd., 1/5, 1/8 1/13 @ f16, ISO 100. 3 bracketed
frames layered masked in PS.
Cheers,
Dave
--
PDML
Nice composition. A tough exposure job here with the bright sky and dark
ground. I think you handled it about as well as you could in a single exposure.
A two exposure composite here might have been stunning.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: David Savage [EMAIL
You somehow need to open up the foreground a little. It looks like an
interesting texture, but is a bit too dark on my monitor.
David Savage wrote:
(Forgot the details)
G'day All,
Another from this evening (a little more conventional this time, ~160KB):
On Nov 30, 2007, at 10:18, Bruce Dayton wrote:
Always good to reply to yourself. It is interesting to note that
several have commented on the foreground being murky. On my monitor
it is dark, but just fine - no murkiness - I can see the details.
Now my monitor is
calibrated and I don't
David - what Jack said
ann
Jack Davis wrote:
Foreground area appears very murky on my monitor..of course. :)
I really can't see what the dark area holds, but a 'think' the bottom
might benefit from a crop.
Tough exposure, for sure!
Jack
--- David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
G'day
14 matches
Mail list logo
