Hi,
It is truth that old K, M lenses are built very well. My SMC K 135/2.5 is built like a
tank and other my K i M lenses are very good in this respect.
Alek
Uytkownik Pl Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] napisa:
Alek wrote:
Thank you! so for the price K35/3.5 is great and if one can afford to buy FA
Alek wrote:
Thank you! so for the price K35/3.5 is great and if one can afford to buy FA version
it pays.
I shall try to find old for beginning.
The problem with AF lenses (most of them anyway) is that they are AF lenses; loose,
rattly, and focuses past infinity. Unfortunately, I've
The problem with AF lenses (most of them anyway) is
that they are AF lenses; loose,
rattly, and focuses past infinity. Unfortunately,
I've discovered that initially
tight AF lenses develop looseness over time. It may
well be that some newer AF
designs are potentially beter optically, but
Is FA 35/2.0 better than highly recommended K35/2.0 and K35/3.5 lenses?Which is the
best?
Alek
Uytkownik Dan Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] napisa:
On Friday, December 6, 2002, at 08:19 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FA35/2.0 which is probably very good.
Alek
No _probably_ about it Alek. Just,
Only if you need auto focus. The 35 f3.5 is in a league of its own - try and
buy one in the K mount!
Bob Rapp
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2002 9:49 PM
Subject: Re: Re: Who has switched to Pentax and why?
Is FA 35/2.0
Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2002 9:49 PM
Subject: Re: Re: Who has switched to Pentax and why?
Is FA 35/2.0 better than highly recommended K35/2.0 and K35/3.5 lenses?Which
is the best?
Alek
Uytkownik Dan Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] napisa
Uytkownik Bob Rapp [EMAIL PROTECTED] napisa:
Only if you need auto focus. The 35 f3.5 is in a league of its own - try and
buy one in the K mount!
Bob Rapp
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2002 9:49 PM
Subject: Re: Re: Who has switched
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2002 9:49 PM
Subject: Re: Re: Who has switched to Pentax and why?
Is FA 35/2.0 better than highly recommended K35/2.0 and K35/3.5 lenses?Which
is the best?
Alek
Uytkownik Dan Scott
one in the K mount!
Bob Rapp
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2002 9:49 PM
Subject: Re: Re: Who has switched to Pentax and why?
Is FA 35/2.0 better than highly recommended K35/2.0 and K35/3.5 lenses?Which
is the best?
Alek
Keep looking. They are available. I have been watching ebay for a
couple of years for a K3.5/35. I found one a month ago on ebay for $30
in mint condition. Only the plastic cap had a little silver lettering
rubbed off on it.
On Tuesday 10 December 2002 01:04 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
Well, I wanted a SLR, but hadn't the money to buy a new one. My father
had 2 old lenses (Pentax 135mm and 50mm) which he gave to me, and so I
ended up buying a used ME body...
that's it... but I'm very happy how it turned out ^_^
bye Katrin
On Thursday, December 05, 2002 9:59 AM, Lon
Hi,
What was the price of A50/1.4?
Alek
Uytkownik Arnold Stark [EMAIL PROTECTED] napisa:
Hi, my name is Arnold Stark, and I shoot Pentax because Pentax gives me
excellent, beautiful lenses and good, small bodies at prices that I can
afford. My first SLR was a Ricoh KR10-X with a Tokina zoom in
And Pentax gear is better than Minolta's? Some people believe that MZS is worse than
Dynax/Maxxum 7, not mentioning 9
Alek
What about lenses?Minolta has now some great lenses
Alek
Uytkownik Bruce Rubenstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] napisa:
Sorry Wendy, I was thinking of serious camera brands, like
Hi,
I see. Thank you!
Alek
PS Which Limited lenses do you have? Is 43/1.9 much better than A/FA 50/1.4 or 1.7?
Uytkownik Arnold Stark [EMAIL PROTECTED] napisa:
In 1988 the A50/f1.4 cost me 330 DM new.
Arnold
Hi, What was the price of A50/1.4? Alek
14 matches
Mail list logo
