At 04:49 AM 10/11/2006, Gonz wrote:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > On 10/20/06, William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >>- Original Message -
> >>From: "David Savage"
> >>Subject: RE: The JCO survey
> >>
> &
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On 10/20/06, William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>- Original Message -
>>From: "David Savage"
>>Subject: RE: The JCO survey
>>
>>>Aren't you? You've said so many times that you have no
The post topic was about the age of the lenses
not pentaxnomics.
jco
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
William Robb
Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2006 8:20 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: The JCO survey - I should start lurking
- Original Message -
From: "J. C. O'Connell"
Subject: RE: The JCO survey - I should start lurking more often.
> The age of the lenses is irellavant, its
> whether they are compatible with the
> current mount and K/M lenses are fully
> compatible with th
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
P. J. Alling
Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2006 2:54 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: The JCO survey - I should start lurking more often.
Not even worthy of a response.
John Forbes wrote:
> On Tue, 31 Oct 2006 20:20:26 -,
On Wed, 08 Nov 2006 19:54:19 -, P. J. Alling
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Not even worthy of a response.
Nonetheless, it seems to have elicited one. :-)
John
>
> John Forbes wrote:
>> On Tue, 31 Oct 2006 20:20:26 -, Lon Williamson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> A flagship
Not even worthy of a response.
John Forbes wrote:
> On Tue, 31 Oct 2006 20:20:26 -, Lon Williamson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>> A flagship is a flagship, and if there's a K1D in the future, it should
>> be as
>> complete as the LX was in its day.
>>
>
> Quite right. As complete,
On 11/02/06 7:32 PM, "Perry Pellechia", <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We all expect perfect messages from you now.
>
> On 11/2/06, J. C. O'Connell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> MUCHO GRACIAS!
>> JCO
But now he is ALL CAPITAL!
Ken
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/
er 02, 2006 6:44 PM
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Subject: Re: The JCO survey - I need a prize.
>
>
> 1) Turn off using Word as the email editor:
> Tools -> Options -> Mail Format Tab -> uncheck both "Use MS Office
> Word..."
>
> 2) Turn off auto correct
MUCHO GRACIAS!
JCO
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Perry Pellechia
Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2006 6:44 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: The JCO survey - I need a prize.
1) Turn off using Word as the email editor:
Tools
Many Thanks,
JCO
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
John Coyle
Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2006 7:02 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Mail text formatting: was Re: The JCO survey - I need a prize.
John, you may find these tips
d they are not easy
> To find or shut off, even with the help information
> Provided with the programs.
>
> Thanks in advance,
> JCO
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Christian
> Sent: Thursday, November 0
ff in the program settings, but to no avail.
Try harder. Everybody else gets it right.
> jco
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Christian
> Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2006 3:23 PM
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
ation
> Provided with the programs.
>
> Thanks in advance,
> JCO
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Christian
> Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2006 4:36 PM
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Subject: Re: The
Christian
Sent: 2. november 2006 21:23
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: The JCO survey - I need a prize.
Cotty wrote:
> On 2/11/06, J. C. O'Connell, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
>
>>I thinks its time to add, don't start surveys
>>And put OTHER people's na
advance,
JCO
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Christian
Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2006 4:36 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: The JCO survey - I need a prize.
J. C. O'Connell wrote:
> Blame Bill Gates. My ms-outlook/word
J. C. O'Connell wrote:
> Blame Bill Gates. My ms-outlook/word program
> Is automatically changing **some** spelling
>>From what is typed and also capitolizing
> Some words ( every first word in each
> Line, even if it's in the middle of a
> Sentence. I have tried and tried many times to turn
> This
On 2/11/06, Christian, discombobulated, unleashed:
>Why not blame global warming, the
>economy, our mothers, George W. Bush, sun spots or Cotty?
You've gone too far this time Christian. What have our mothers done to you!!
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
to turn
This stuff off in the program settings, but to no avail.
jco
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Christian
Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2006 3:23 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: The JCO survey - I need a prize.
Cotty wrote
Cotty wrote:
> On 2/11/06, J. C. O'Connell, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
>
>>I thinks its time to add, don't start surveys
>>And put OTHER people's names on them, if it was
>>Your survey, which it was in this case, than call it yours.
>>jco
>
>
> That *must* be the last word.
If you can call
oooh
I thought JCO stood for "Just Counting Opinions"
ann ducks
Cotty wrote:
> On 2/11/06, J. C. O'Connell, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
> >I thinks its time to add, don't start surveys
> >And put OTHER people's names on them, if it was
> >Your survey, which it was in this case, than call i
On 2/11/06, J. C. O'Connell, discombobulated, unleashed:
>I thinks its time to add, don't start surveys
>And put OTHER people's names on them, if it was
>Your survey, which it was in this case, than call it yours.
>jco
That *must* be the last word.
D'oh!
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O)
Mail List
Subject: Re: The JCO survey
I find this to be true on my M bodies. You can't just use your fore or
mid
finger to twist the shutter dial easily. My KX bodies, however, don't
have as much friction that way. I think this depends on the body.
I have 3 MX bodies and 4 KX bodies, so
I thinks its time to add, don't start surveys
And put OTHER people's names on them, if it was
Your survey, which it was in this case, than call it yours.
jco
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Lon Williamson
Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2006 1
On Nov 2, 2006, at 11:50 AM, Lon Williamson wrote:
> Thistles thrown at twenty paces?
> Pizza without sauce or cheese?
> Rocks in my socks?
> Being doomed to listen to JCO forever?
>
> Penitent, I am, I am...
I think being banned forever ought to suffice.
Bob
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail L
I find this to be true on my M bodies. You can't just use your fore or mid
finger to twist the shutter dial easily. My KX bodies, however, don't
have as much friction that way. I think this depends on the body.
I have 3 MX bodies and 4 KX bodies, so I suspect I have a reassonable
sampling of the
It's the camera that replaced the K1000.
-Adam
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
> Never heard of that one, either.
>
> Shel
>
>
>
>
>>[Original Message]
>>From: keith_w
>
>>Shel Belinkoff wrote:
>
>
>>>The ZX-M? Never heard of it.
>
>
>>Mfg. 1997. Same camera as the MZ-M in the U.S.
>
>
>
>
> From: Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2006/10/31 Tue PM 10:59:05 GMT
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Subject: Re: The JCO survey
>
> Arghhh!
> It's back. It's Halloween, and the thread from hell is back!!
It _is_ the day when de
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> John Forbes
> Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 6:55 PM
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Subject: Re: The JCO survey - I should start lurking more often.
>
> On Tue, 31 Oct 2006 20:
- Original Message -
From: "J. C. O'Connell"
Subject: RE: The JCO survey - I should start lurking more often.
> Because the lens mount is the same as it was 32 years ago!
> That's why. You cant say its OK because the K/M lenses
> Are old. So is the
Never heard of that one, either.
Shel
> [Original Message]
> From: keith_w Shel Belinkoff wrote:
> > The ZX-M? Never heard of it.
> Mfg. 1997. Same camera as the MZ-M in the U.S.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
> The ZX-M? Never heard of it. I'll have to check Boz's site. Anyway, I'm
> not in the market for a film camera right now. Got enough of them ;-))
>
> Shel
Mfg. 1997. Same camera as the MZ-M in the U.S.
Me too!
keith
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
htt
ature which necessitated dropping the KM full
Support.
jco
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
John Forbes
Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 6:55 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: The JCO survey - I should start lurking more often.
O
On 31/10/06, John Forbes, discombobulated, unleashed:
>In other words, the LX provided only partial support for six year-old
>lenses. So why should the K1D provide full support for thirty two-year
>old lenses (assuming it makes its debut in 2007).
In the same vein, please do use petrol to st
The ZX-M? Never heard of it. I'll have to check Boz's site. Anyway, I'm
not in the market for a film camera right now. Got enough of them ;-))
Shel
> [Original Message]
> From: Lon Williamson
> Shel, consider the ZX-M. Not an exensive camera.
> I've used it, and purchased it.
> It ha
On Tue, 31 Oct 2006 20:20:26 -, Lon Williamson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A flagship is a flagship, and if there's a K1D in the future, it should
> be as
> complete as the LX was in its day.
Quite right. As complete, not more. I don't recall that the LX mounted
screw-thread lenses with
Just to be clear, I posted my message more than a week ago. The thread is
now just another goblin.
Shel
> [Original Message]
> From: Paul Stenquist
> Arghhh!
> It's back. It's Halloween, and the thread from hell is back!!
>
> On Oct 31, 2006, at 5:29 PM, Lon Williamson wrote:
>
> > S
Arghhh!
It's back. It's Halloween, and the thread from hell is back!!
On Oct 31, 2006, at 5:29 PM, Lon Williamson wrote:
> Shel, consider the ZX-M. Not an exensive camera. I've used it, and
> purchased it.
> It has the bits you mentioned. It's actually kinda sweet.
>
> Shel Belinkoff
Shel, consider the ZX-M. Not an exensive camera. I've used it, and
purchased it.
It has the bits you mentioned. It's actually kinda sweet.
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
>Yes, I understand that, but I wonder of JCO grasps the concept. I knew a
>number of people in the automotive business many years
Savage
>Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2006 10:54 AM
>To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>Subject: Re: Dealing with eBay vendors. Was: Re: The JCO survey
>
>You arrogant sod.
>
>Which part of:
>
>"If you don't want people to comment, take it off list."
>
>
this point.
>
>John
>
>
>
>>Tom C.
>>
>>Original Message Follows
>>From: "John Forbes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
>>Subject: Re: Dealing with eBa
On 10/26/06, John Forbes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Oct 2006 16:02:55 +0100, Scott Loveless <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > Give Kostas a break. He's good people. ;)
>
> Don't you mean Kosta?
>
Yes, Johns, that's exactly what I meant.
--
Scott Loveless
http://www.twosixteen.com
publically
Without cause.
jco
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
David Savage
Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2006 10:54 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Dealing with eBay vendors. Was: Re: The JCO survey
You arrogant sod.
Which part of
EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
John Forbes
Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2006 11:13 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Dealing with eBay vendors. Was: Re: The JCO survey
If you want this to stop, then stop posting yourself. It's quite
simple.
John
On Thu, 26 Oct 2006 15:51:30 +0
On Thu, 26 Oct 2006, Scott Loveless wrote:
> Give Kostas a break. He's good people. ;)
Thanks Scott. Forbes goes straight to /dev/null anyway.
Kostas
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
William Robb
Sent: 25. oktober 2006 01:51
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: The JCO survey
- Original Message -
From: "ann sanfedele"
Subject: Re: The JCO survey
>
> come on guys - take it off
On Thu, 26 Oct 2006 16:02:55 +0100, Scott Loveless <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Give Kostas a break. He's good people. ;)
Don't you mean Kosta?
John
>
> On 10/26/06, John Forbes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> It's fairly easy to understand, Kostas, and it isn't crap.
>>
>> And Cotty isn't "f
n Forbes
> Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2006 10:19 AM
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Subject: Re: Dealing with eBay vendors. Was: Re: The JCO survey
>
> Whilst you persist in your unpleasant posts, I shall persist, when I
> feel
> like it, to post in response, you impertinent g
Give Kostas a break. He's good people. ;)
On 10/26/06, John Forbes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's fairly easy to understand, Kostas, and it isn't crap.
>
> And Cotty isn't "folks", he's Cotty. As English presumably isn't your
> first language, I am sure you will not mind me pointing out that
You arrogant sod.
Which part of:
"If you don't want people to comment, take it off list."
...don't you understand?
By airing this in public you've made it a topic free for anyone to comment on.
Oh and by the way, what exactly was I speculating on in my last message?
Dave
On 10/26/06, J. C. O
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
John Forbes
Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2006 10:19 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Dealing with eBay vendors. Was: Re: The JCO survey
Whilst you persist in your unpleasant posts, I shall persist, when I
feel
like it, to post
ve no
>> Right to be continuing with this
>> Nonsense based on your incorrect
>> "hunches".
>>
>> JCO
>>
>> -Original Message-----
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
> Of
>> John Forbes
>> Sent:
"hunches".
>
> JCO
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> John Forbes
> Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2006 4:47 AM
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Subject: Re: Dealing with eBay vendors. Was: Re: The JCO survey
>
a no-no on your part.
jco
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Shel Belinkoff
Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2006 7:44 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: RE: Dealing with eBay vendors. Was: Re: The JCO survey
I remembered your total refund
Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Dealing with eBay vendors. Was: Re: The JCO survey
You've been carping on about this for a couple of day's now in a
public forum. If you don't want people to comment, take it off list.
Dave
On 10/26/06, J. C. O'Connell <[EMAIL PR
Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
William Robb
Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2006 8:39 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Dealing with eBay vendors. Was: Re: The JCO survey
- Original Message -
From: "John Forbes"
Subject: Re: Dealing
It's fairly easy to understand, Kostas, and it isn't crap.
And Cotty isn't "folks", he's Cotty. As English presumably isn't your
first language, I am sure you will not mind me pointing out that a final
"s" usually denotes a plural. As "folk" is a collective noun, it is
impossible to address
--
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> John Forbes
> Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2006 4:47 AM
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Subject: Re: Dealing with eBay vendors. Was: Re: The JCO survey
>
> On Thu, 26 Oct 2006 08:30:55 +0100, J. C. O
al Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
John Forbes
Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2006 4:47 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Dealing with eBay vendors. Was: Re: The JCO survey
On Thu, 26 Oct 2006 08:30:55 +0100, J. C. O'Connell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ng the truth, the whole truth, and
>> Nothing but the truth. Its damaging when
>> Its not all that.
>> jco
>>
>> -----Original Message-
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
>> William Robb
>> Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2006 8:
- Original Message -
From: "John Forbes"
Subject: Re: Dealing with eBay vendors. Was: Re: The JCO survey
>
> Perhaps our intellectual capabilities are rather different, but I
> don't
> think a double negative is a very difficult concept to grasp. The
&g
: Tuesday, October 24, 2006 8:24 PM
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Subject: Re: Dealing with eBay vendors. Was: Re: The JCO survey
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Tom C"
> Subject: Re: Dealing with eBay vendors. Was: Re: The JCO survey
>
>
> &g
On Thu, 26 Oct 2006, Cotty wrote:
> XXX may be a nutty distant cousin to the devil, but YYY is no angel
> IMO.
Come on folks, what kind of crap is that.
Kostas
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>
> From: "John Forbes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2006/10/26 Thu AM 09:45:32 GMT
> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
> Subject: Re: Dealing with eBay vendors. Was: Re: The JCO survey
>
> On Thu, 26 Oct 2006 09:09:00 +0100, mike wilson <[EMAIL P
On Thu, 26 Oct 2006 09:09:00 +0100, mike wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
>>
>> From: "John Forbes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Date: 2006/10/26 Thu AM 08:50:02 GMT
>> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
>> Subject: Re: Dealing with e
On 26/10/06, John Forbes, discombobulated, unleashed:
>The irony is that everytime somebody asks people to stop adding to the
>thread, they are themselves adding to it.
>
>If you don't want others to post, take your own advice!
Right.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Pl
>
> From: "John Forbes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2006/10/26 Thu AM 08:50:02 GMT
> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
> Subject: Re: Dealing with eBay vendors. Was: Re: The JCO survey
>
> On Thu, 26 Oct 2006 09:04:00 +0100, mike wilson <[EMAIL P
o to bed"
>
> For the sake of everyone's sanity can we put this one to bed please.
> PUHLEASE
>
> Peter
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Cotty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "pentax list"
> Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2006
On Thu, 26 Oct 2006 09:04:00 +0100, mike wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
>>
>> From: "John Forbes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Date: 2006/10/26 Thu AM 01:15:02 GMT
>
>> But you are ever the contrarian,
>
> Is that similar to, but not exactly like, a libertarian? I get so
> confused by US po
m. That is a major step forward.
John
> jco
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> John Forbes
> Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2006 10:29 AM
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Subject: Re: Dealing with eBay vendo
On 26/10/06, J. C. O'Connell, discombobulated, unleashed:
>Look I really don't care if anyone on the list buys
>Stuff from me, what got me so upset is that its
>A personal attack on my character to say my ebay
>Selling is in anyway unfair to anyone. That's my
>Point in the whole matter.
I wouldn'
>
> From: "John Forbes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2006/10/26 Thu AM 01:15:02 GMT
> But you are ever the contrarian,
Is that similar to, but not exactly like, a libertarian? I get so confused by
US politics.
-
Email sent from www.ntlworld.com
Viru
lto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2006 11:51 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Dealing with eBay vendors. Was: Re: The JCO survey
Agreed Tom, but the way he's acted/responded with the "aperture
simulator"
convinces me I
ly when he never should have even
Bid if he wanted a perfect lens.
jco
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
John Forbes
Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2006 9:55 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Dealing with eBay vendors. Was: Re: The JCO
riginal Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
John Forbes
Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2006 9:15 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Dealing with eBay vendors. Was: Re: The JCO survey
On Wed, 25 Oct 2006 20:34:16 +0100, Tom C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wro
Wednesday, October 25, 2006 10:21 PM
To: pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Dealing with eBay vendors. Was: Re: The JCO survey
I don't think I'm being obtuse. He also had the opportunity to totally
back
out of the deal at no cost to himself. If he didn't do that and
complains
about it la
EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
John Forbes
Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2006 10:29 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Dealing with eBay vendors. Was: Re: The JCO survey
On Wed, 25 Oct 2006 14:11:22 +0100, J. C. O'Connell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Are both you and him retarded o
-
> From: "John Forbes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
> Subject: Re: Dealing with eBay vendors. Was: Re: The JCO survey
> Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2006 02:15:02 +0100
>
> On Wed, 25 Oct 2006
At 11:14 PM 25/10/2006, Peter Jordan wrote:
>For the sake of everyone's sanity can we put this one to bed please.
>PUHLEASE
No!
Dave ;-)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
uot;Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
Subject: Re: Dealing with eBay vendors. Was: Re: The JCO survey
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2006 02:54:58 +0100
On Thu, 26 Oct 2006 02:34:04 +0100, Tom C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd just like to point out that those who are judging JCO on his deal
> w
ur Ovaltine and go to bed"
For the sake of everyone's sanity can we put this one to bed please.
PUHLEASE
Peter
- Original Message -
From: "Cotty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "pentax list"
Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2006 9:55 PM
Subject: Re: The JCO surv
; Tom C.
>
> Original Message Follows
> From: "John Forbes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
> Subject: Re: Dealing with eBay vendors. Was: Re: The JCO survey
> Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2006 02:15:02
-Discuss Mail List"
Subject: Re: Dealing with eBay vendors. Was: Re: The JCO survey
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2006 02:15:02 +0100
On Wed, 25 Oct 2006 20:34:16 +0100, Tom C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> John,
>
> Your wording "least unsatisfactory", being a bit of a doubl
aracteristically silly, one has left the list,
and the last has left the planet. No guesses as to the identity of that
one.
John
>
> Tom C.
>
>
>
>
> Original Message Follows
> From: "John Forbes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: Pentax-Discus
;
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
Subject: Re: Dealing with eBay vendors. Was: Re: The JCO survey
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2006 15:28:56 +0100
On Wed, 25 Oct 2006 14:11:22 +0100, J. C. O'Connell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Are both you and him r
ay he did considering how that deal was
> Handled by both me (good) and him (bad).
>
>
> jco
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> John Forbes
> Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2006 5:28 AM
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mai
---
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
John Forbes
Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2006 5:28 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Dealing with eBay vendors. Was: Re: The JCO survey
On Wed, 25 Oct 2006 07:24:40 +0100, graywolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On Wed, 25 Oct 2006 07:24:40 +0100, graywolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Boy, there must be something out there lessoning me. I had a recent deal
> that I was not too happy about. Not the item, but the way the seller was
> acting. In the end it worked out, but I was up in the air about
> feedback
>Shel Belinkoff wrote:
>> My experience with JCO was not a pleasant one, and, because of that, I will
>> not do business with him again. As an eBay buyer - especially one dealing
>> with a fellow list member - I don't want confrontational and accusatory
>> emails. Sh!t happens, and there's no r
Boy, there must be something out there lessoning me. I had a recent deal
that I was not too happy about. Not the item, but the way the seller was
acting. In the end it worked out, but I was up in the air about
feedback. Now this here, and a thread on another list made my think it
through, and I
At 04:55 AM 25/10/2006, Cotty wrote:
>On 24/10/06, Christian, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
> >> An add-on aperture simulator?
> >
> >Goddammit CoTty you stupid frigging
> >Idiot. Its called a aperture
> >Cam sensor!
> >
> >:-) <-- right back at ya
> >
> >(spelling, punctuation, gramm
>Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2006 7:51 PM
>To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>Subject: Re: The JCO survey
>
>
>- Original Message -----
>From: "ann sanfedele"
>Subject: Re: The JCO survey
>
>
>
> >
> > come on guys - take it off list or lighten up
I take exception to this. You don't put dogs down for this type of thing...
you work with them and as Cesar Milan says you rehabilitate dogs and train
their owners.
I know you were using this as a figure of speech and probably did not mean
it, but I would prefer not suggest dogs be put down for
Bully? What the hell are you talking about?
What have I done or posted to justify that label?
jco
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
William Robb
Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2006 7:51 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: The JCO survey
Of
William Robb
Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2006 8:18 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Dealing with eBay vendors. Was: Re: The JCO survey
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Dealing with eBay vendors. Was: Re: The JCO survey
> Personally
List
Subject: Re: Dealing with eBay vendors. Was: Re: The JCO survey
- Original Message -
From: "Tom C"
Subject: Re: Dealing with eBay vendors. Was: Re: The JCO survey
>
> The part Shel left out was, that in the end, the transaction was
> handled to
> their mutual sa
On 10/24/06, P. J. Alling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Scott Loveless wrote:
>
> >On 10/24/06, Christian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Cotty wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>You think yor some kind of SMART ASS
> >>>You fucking dumb shit. What the hell kind
> >>>Of game are you playing? I've con
Scott Loveless wrote:
>On 10/24/06, Christian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>>Cotty wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>You think yor some kind of SMART ASS
>>>You fucking dumb shit. What the hell kind
>>>Of game are you playing? I've constantly
>>>Said the same thing ver and ver again and
>>>You just don't
ect: Re: Dealing with eBay vendors. Was: Re: The JCO survey
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2006 18:24:11 -0600
- Original Message -
From: "Tom C"
Subject: Re: Dealing with eBay vendors. Was: Re: The JCO survey
>
> The part Shel left out was, that in the end, the transaction was
>
In a message dated 10/24/2006 5:41:10 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
JCO will stop if no one addresses him. That is the only way the list
can "win." I thought that most of the list members had agreed to put
a halt to this a few days ago? He'll continue as long as he is
a
1 - 100 of 1399 matches
Mail list logo
