NB This theme is doing my head in, it's so open to interpretation. Comments
NB anyone?
NB Norm
My first two thougths were a landscape and the surroundings of
something. But there are indeed many more interpretations.
Attila
You are most very welcome Bruce, credit where credit is due I say, and that
little girl of yours is adorable too...
tan.
Bruce D:
Thanks for noticing. Means alot when a people photographer notices.
That hair is fun at times, but can be a real pain when she doesn't
want to cooperate (seems
Did you get a not so fluffy shot,Brendan
Dave
Pentax User
Stouffville Ontario Canada
http://home.ca.inter.net/brooksdj/
http://brooks1952.tripod.com/myhorses
Sign up today for your Free E-mail at: http://www.canoe.ca/CanoeMail
yup, but I think the red 29 will do better han a 25
--- David Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Did you get a not so fluffy shot,Brendan
Dave
Pentax User
Stouffville Ontario Canada
http://home.ca.inter.net/brooksdj/
http://brooks1952.tripod.com/myhorses
Sign up today for your Free
Duly noted and recorded:)
Dave
Begin Original Message
From: Brendan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Mon, 23 Sep 2002 13:00:49 -0400 (EDT)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: (2): PUG deadline gone!
yup, but I think the red 29 will do better han a 25
Pentax User
Stouffville Ontario
John,
I face this every time I shoot a wedding. I have found that the only
solution is fill flash - sometimes quite strong, which explains why I
just picked up both leaf shutter lenses for the 67 (Dang, that fisheye
keeps getting pushed back). That noonday sun is a real killer isn't
it. Still
Make that two happy viewers.
I was going to complement you on the photo when I had the time to comment on
all the others I liked, but I can't let you think only one of us like the
image.
It's not only a beautifully crafted photo, but it conveys such a feeling of
childlike (not childish) joy.
I
Simon King wrote:
[Comments on Cotty's PUG submission this month]
Hi Cotty,
Add me to the list of admirers as well. As usual, I found many photos I
enjoyed in this month's gallery. (I'll try to get around to providing
timely comments on the rest this month.) Yours was one of my
Bill Peifer writes:
But getting into the water with a charged high-voltage capacitor (like the
one in your AF280T)? You're a braver man than I. I've been zapped a time
or two by high-voltage caps on dry land. Getting a zap with wet hands would
no doubt be quite an experience. Might cause one
Used to be when I thought of courageous photographers, I thought of those brave
men and women in war zones (Capa, et al), or PJ's photographing riots like WTO in
Seattle. Or maybe even street photographers, who might get smacked by
drug-crazed loonie who doesn't like cameras.
Now, I'll forever
As Len has rightly pointed out, my title is miss-spelled. It should, of
course, be 'The Hitchhiker' or even possibly 'The Hitch-Hiker'. At least
I can snap better than I can spel.
:-)
Cotty
___
Personal email traffic to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
, June 06, 2002 6:55 PM
Subject: RE: [2] PUG Comments - The Hitchiker
As Len has rightly pointed out, my title is miss-spelled. It
should, of
course, be 'The Hitchhiker' or even possibly 'The
Hitch-Hiker'. At least
I can snap better than I can spel.
:-)
Cotty
Hi Cotty
Make that two happy viewers.
I was going to complement you on the photo when I had the time to comment on
all the others I liked, but I can't let you think only one of us like the
image.
It's not only a beautifully crafted photo, but it conveys such a feeling of
childlike (not childish)
Hi,
I'm afraid it leaves out all of the materialists and monists among us
too, Jostein.
Ain't got no soul. g
---
Bob
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tuesday, May 14, 2002, 7:47:33 PM, you wrote:
The Norwegian Museum of Photography opened a portraits exhibition on
May 5th. Featuring 25 Arnold
- Original Message -
From: Bob Walkden [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm afraid it leaves out all of the materialists and monists among
us
too, Jostein.
Ain't got no soul. g
um... Which side of the camera were you thinking of...:-)
gee... I figured I would get a paw from the cat lovers on
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jostein
gee... I figured I would get a paw from the cat lovers on
the list for
my comment about animals and portraits, but there you go.
We're laying low till this portrait thread blows over.
Mishka,
I'm thinking that 'Wilson' from the Castaway movie would count for a
portrait. :)
Bruce Dayton
Tuesday, April 23, 2002, 6:40:50 AM, you wrote:
M so it doesn't have to be a face, does it
My Pocket Oxford Dictionary defines Portrait as:
'Painted, drawn, or photographic likeness
William,
I think the girls will do some more submissions. They have just been
really swamped with school and music, not to mention me being swamped.
We should get back into the groove soon.
Thanks for asking.
Bruce Dayton
Tuesday, November 27, 2001, 4:44:49 PM, you wrote:
WR Thanks
Hi,
If it's in December it's a solstice, not an equinox: Dec. 21st/19:21
GMT.
http://www.rog.nmm.ac.uk/leaflets/seasons/equinox.html
---
Bob
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Monday, September 03, 2001, 9:03:52 AM, you wrote:
Can someone please let me know of the precise point in time the
, 2001 11:50 AM
Subject: Re[2]: PUG - Equinox - December
Hi,
If it's in December it's a solstice, not an equinox: Dec. 21st/19:21
GMT.
http://www.rog.nmm.ac.uk/leaflets/seasons/equinox.html
---
Bob
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Monday, September 03, 2001, 9:03:52 AM, you wrote
]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 03, 2001 11:50 AM
Subject: Re[2]: PUG - Equinox - December
Hi,
If it's in December it's a solstice, not an equinox: Dec. 21st/19:21
GMT.
http://www.rog.nmm.ac.uk/leaflets/seasons/equinox.html
---
Bob
mailto:[EMAIL
.
Steve Larson
Redondo Beach, California
- Original Message -
From: Philippe Trottier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 03, 2001 1:59 PM
Subject: Re: Re[2]: PUG - Equinox - December
Is Finland still on the +03:00 or +02:00 then ?
Phil
Bob, I think
I guess I should be nice and include the link:
http://timezoneconverter.com/
Steve Larson
Redondo Beach, California
- Original Message -
From: Steve Larson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 03, 2001 6:04 PM
Subject: Re: Re[2]: PUG - Equinox - December
23
Hi,
this is not helpful advice. If this is understood to be what's
happening then anybody whose submission is greeted with thunderous
silence is left with the impression that nobody likes their picture,
and nobody will tell him/her what's wrong with it! How useful is that?
Offering only praise
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bob Walkden
Sent: Sunday, May 06, 2001 9:08 AM
To: Len Paris
Subject: Re[2]: PUG Comments (NEW IDEA)
Hi,
this is not helpful advice. If this is understood to be what's
happening then anybody whose submission is greeted
with thunderous
silence
Bucky wrote, in response to my earlier comments:
Perhaps. Perhaps not. The expression of opinion does not
necessarily equate to expertise.
I really like a lot of Shel's work, and I suspect he's got a fair amount
of formal artistic training
Hi,
comments embedded.
Tuesday, May 01, 2001, 5:01:10 PM, you wrote:
You know these are the kind of comments that will drive people away from
contributing. I don't think we were asked as much to critique the
submissions, as we were simply to comment on them.
what's the difference?
27 matches
Mail list logo
