On 1/16/07, Doug Franklin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Amita Guha wrote:
>
> > I can vouch for both the CompactDrive and the Epson devices - I have
>
> Amita, how much data could you transfer from memory cards to either of
> these devices on one battery charge?
I'm afraid I can't give you a reliab
Hello Doug,
There are two major directions with the portable devices. One is to
provide a screen with viewing capabilities to review pictures. The
other is a simple storage device that just stores the images.
The Epson is a viewing style and arguably the best of that type. The
CompactDrive is
Bruce Dayton wrote:
> There are two major directions with the portable devices. One is to
> provide a screen with viewing capabilities to review pictures. The
> other is a simple storage device that just stores the images.
Yep, my MediaGear box is the simple type, too. I see no reason to get
t
Bruce Dayton wrote:
> I'm guessing on my CompactDrive that I can transfer about 10gb on one
> battery charge. Beyond that, since it takes AA's I can quickly put
> another set in, if needed.
That's good to know. Unfortunately, my little MediaGear box uses some
sort of proprietary battery, I think
On Jan 16, 2007, at 11:55 AM, Adam Maas wrote:
> I'm fond of my laptop, but it's not a replacement for a portable
> storage
> unit, it's simply too large and heavy.
Exactly. I carry the Epson P2000 when I don't want to be burdened
with the size and weight of a laptop. It weighs about a pound
Sadly, it doesn't fit in a belt-pouch like the other options.
I'm fond of my laptop, but it's not a replacement for a portable storage
unit, it's simply too large and heavy.
-Adam
Thibouille wrote:
> Mmm my thinkpad X60 cost me a leg and an arm but It reads sd cards, is
> 1.5kg has a 12" scree
Mmm my thinkpad X60 cost me a leg and an arm but It reads sd cards, is
1.5kg has a 12" screen, 80GB disk and 8 hours battery time.. oh and
dual core cpu/1.5GB so PS performance is not a concern at all.
If you have money it is not a stupid option at all.
2007/1/16, Leon Altoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
One of the folks on another list uses the CompactDrive PD70X with
Everready E2 Lithium AA disposables. He told me he was able to nearly
fill an 80G drive with *ist DS PEF files before he exhausted a set.
Godfrey
On Jan 16, 2007, at 8:37 AM, Bruce Dayton wrote:
> I'm guessing on my CompactDr
I'm guessing on my CompactDrive that I can transfer about 10gb on one
battery charge. Beyond that, since it takes AA's I can quickly put
another set in, if needed.
--
Bruce
Tuesday, January 16, 2007, 5:17:10 AM, you wrote:
DF> Amita Guha wrote:
>> I can vouch for both the CompactDrive and th
On Jan 16, 2007, at 5:17 AM, Doug Franklin wrote:
> Amita Guha wrote:
>
>> I can vouch for both the CompactDrive and the Epson devices - I have
>
> Amita, how much data could you transfer from memory cards to either of
> these devices on one battery charge? I've got a cheap little housing
> from
Doug, my PD7X came with both standard cord and car charger cord. I am
yet to use it with batteries.
On 1/16/07, Doug Franklin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Amita Guha wrote:
>
> > I can vouch for both the CompactDrive and the Epson devices - I have
>
> Amita, how much data could you transfer from m
Amita Guha wrote:
> I can vouch for both the CompactDrive and the Epson devices - I have
Amita, how much data could you transfer from memory cards to either of
these devices on one battery charge? I've got a cheap little housing
from MediaGear that I put a 40GB 2.5" drive in. It works great, bu
Hi Mark,
Have you considered something like an ultralight laptop? You can load
your own software for viewing and do editing and even take care of your
email while you are out.
I have an earlier version of the small Fujitsu and have found it works
well for me. This is the current version (Aust
I can vouch for both the CompactDrive and the Epson devices - I have
an Epson P-4000 now. The CompactDrive is a great no-nonsense option,
like Bruce said. The Epsons have the best screens of any device out
there, if you care about that sort of thing. One nice thing about the
CompactDrive is that it
Hello Mark,
CompactDrive and HyperDrive are the same thing, so I would go with a
HyperDrive at www.hyperdrive.com. I have had my CompactDrive for
quite a long time and have been happy with it. I picked it
specifically because of the fast download time and long battery life
for the downloads. No
I'm still using and happy with the Espon P2000. Fast enough,
beautiful review screen, economical on power. No support for SDHC
yet, however, so I stick with 2G capacity SD cards.
Godfrey
On Jan 15, 2007, at 2:15 PM, Mark Cassino wrote:
> My X's Drive II is back to having problems reading SD
My X's Drive II is back to having problems reading SD cards, so it's
time to get a new image storage device. I'd just as soon take the 30 gig
drive out of the X's drive and put it in a new device.
A while back when I mentioned the pathetically slow download time from
the X's drive, there were s
17 matches
Mail list logo
