- Original Message -
From: "Raimo K"
Subject: Re: VS: NEW_PUG - questions
> Well, supposedly there is this Japanese whiskey - Suntory? - which
has on
> it´s label: beware of imitations.
I have tried their pseudo Scotch.
I can't imagine wanting to imitate it.
T
>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, April 12, 2004 11:46 PM
Subject: Re: VS: NEW_PUG - questions
> How true!
>
> Nick Clark wrote:
>
> >There's no such thing as "scotch whiskey"!
> >
> >
>
>
On 12/4/04, A JOLLY MAN discumbobulated:
>Argh! Now look what you've done, Cotty... :-)
Not guilty. But thank you.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|www.macads.co.uk/snaps
_
>> So you'll be sticking around then Bill?
>>
>
>Me? Off topic?
>You mock me.
>
>William Robb
In one ;-)
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|www.macads.co.uk/snaps
_
Otis Wright wrote:
I guess so Oooops found "Scotch Whisky" in MW's book of
words. Maybe you should publish your book
of words. Knew you had trouble with right and wrong. Didn't know
it had progressed this far.
You talking to Nick or Mark?
keith
Otis
Keith Whaley wrote
Now that makes sense... Especially, to one whose spelling
skills are non existent.
Otis
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Otis Wright"
Subject: Re: VS: NEW_PUG - questions
Random House Dictionary says there is. Not shortage of "
- Original Message -
From: "Otis Wright"
Subject: Re: VS: NEW_PUG - questions
> Random House Dictionary says there is. Not shortage of "experts"
> here
>
The Scots spell it "whisky". I got called out on it a while back.
William Robb
Just don't want to confuse the real thing with those wanabees!
Nick
-Original Message-
From: "Otis Wright"<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: 12/04/04 23:44:15
To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: VS: NEW_PUG - questions
I guess so Oooops found "Scotch Whisky" in MW's book of
words. Maybe you should publish your book
of words. Knew you had trouble with right and wrong. Didn't know
it had progressed this far.
Otis
Keith Whaley wrote:
That won't be the first instance of their being wrong that
Argh! Now look what you've done, Cotty... :-)
S
John Forbes wrote:
Random Spelling Dictionary. One to avoid.
You will NEVER find Scotch whisky calling itself whiskey.
John
On Mon, 12 Apr 2004 16:50:42 -0400, Otis Wright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Random House Dictionary says there is. Not
There's no such thing as "scotch whiskey"!
Nick
-Original Message-
From: "Mark Roberts"<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: 12/04/04 15:48:41
Well *I'm* setting up a mailing list dedicated to racing motorcycles,
beer, scotch whiskey and politics.
- Original Message -
From: "Cotty"
Subject: Re: VS: NEW_PUG - questions
>
> So you'll be sticking around then Bill?
>
Me? Off topic?
You mock me.
William Robb
>>
>> Going into competition, John?
>>
>>
>He's setting up a mailing list dedicated to cameras and photography,
>and leaving you with the one about racing cars, beer, scotch whisky,
>and politics.
>
>William Robb
So you'll be sticking around then Bill?
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) |
"William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>From: "Doug Brewer"
>Subject: Re: VS: NEW_PUG - questions
>>
>> Going into competition, John?
>>
>He's setting up a mailing list dedicated to cameras and photography,
>and leaving you with
- Original Message -
From: "Doug Brewer"
Subject: Re: VS: NEW_PUG - questions
>
>
> hmmm. Seems like I should get first choice of the two.
>
>
You do get the racing cars and the beer..
At 10:14 AM 4/12/04, throwing caution to the wind, William Robb wrote:
He's setting up a mailing list dedicated to cameras and photography,
and leaving you with the one about racing cars, beer, scotch whisky,
and politics.
William Robb
hmmm. Seems like I should get first choice of the two.
- Original Message -
From: "Doug Brewer"
Subject: Re: VS: NEW_PUG - questions
>
> Going into competition, John?
>
>
He's setting up a mailing list dedicated to cameras and photography,
and leaving you with the one about racing cars, beer, scotch whisky,
and politics.
William Robb
Let's not get too busy dreaming up payment schemes, folks.
If Adelheid & Jostein are happy, the only expense would be
the domain name registration. I now own pdml.us, and I'm
not asking for contributions for at least the next 2 years :-)
Hi!
Jostein, I'd second your opinion here. I really think that
contribution should be voluntary and no specific amount should be set.
Of course, the amount should be reasonable but not limited either from
above or from below.
There're many odd ways at which a group may limit its free members but
rom: "Stan Halpin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, April 11, 2004 10:25 PM
Subject: Re: VS: NEW_PUG - questions
> d. Jostein has asked 'why all the talk about money anyway -
> we can keep it free' (my paraphrase, not a direct quote.)
>
&
I would summarize what I have heard so far as follows:
a. many are willing to help out to keep the PUG alive.
b. the notion of a contributor's fee was raised but most do
not agree.
c. the notion of a voluntary contribution has been endorsed
by many. With maybe an "acknowledgments" page somepla
Honestly, folks.
The PUG rose out of the need for a place for PDML members to share pictures with
each other and the world. It was supposed to be free from the beginning; as
free as PDML itself.
While there is no direct connection between the two, the PUG was conceived by
the PDML, and it is on
By the amount of mail I think that there are more members than that.
IIRC we have had 500 subscribers at best. Maybe more? Lurkers have to pay if
they want to see the posts.
All the best! Raimo
-Alkuperäinen viesti-
Lähettäjä: graywolf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Lähetetty: 11. huhtikuuta
23 matches
Mail list logo
