Re: WTF is wrong with DPReview?

2016-02-18 Thread Bruce Walker
On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 11:39 AM, John wrote: > > On 2/17/2016 9:36 PM, steve harley wrote: >> >> On 2016-02-17 15:55 , P.J. Alling wrote: >>> >>> I just ask this because, having just read their K-1 first impressions I was >>> impressed, one with the camera and two with

Re: WTF is wrong with DPReview?

2016-02-18 Thread John
On 2/17/2016 9:36 PM, steve harley wrote: On 2016-02-17 15:55 , P.J. Alling wrote: I just ask this because, having just read their K-1 first impressions I was impressed, one with the camera and two with their lack of bias, which is unusual for them. also, while trying to list the "full frame"

Re: WTF is wrong with DPReview?

2016-02-17 Thread steve harley
On 2016-02-17 15:55 , P.J. Alling wrote: I just ask this because, having just read their K-1 first impressions I was impressed, one with the camera and two with their lack of bias, which is unusual for them. also, while trying to list the "full frame" lens line, the review completely missed

Re: WTF is wrong with DPReview?

2016-02-17 Thread steve harley
On 2016-02-17 15:55 , P.J. Alling wrote: That is until I got near the end where they tested the K-1 with a "classic" K mount lens, and found it wanting. Which one did they use; You may ask? Arguably the worst 50mm ever produced by Pentax the M 50mm f2.0. Why would anyone expect that

WTF is wrong with DPReview?

2016-02-17 Thread P.J. Alling
I just ask this because, having just read their K-1 first impressions I was impressed, one with the camera and two with their lack of bias, which is unusual for them. That is until I got near the end where they tested the K-1 with a "classic" K mount lens, and found it wanting. Which one