Sandy Harris wrote:
> There are ways to watermark that are quite hard to detect or remove.
> Quoting text I wrote most of at :
> http://en.citizendium.org/wiki/Steganography#Digital_watermarking
>
> Encryption is often used as one of the steps in steganographic hiding
> of information. Consider a
John wrote:
> I don't watermark, but that doesn't mean that you (or anyone else
> shouldn't).
>
> I'm in the "You should only watermark images when you think it will
> deter some unscrupulous asshole from stealing them" camp ... although
> it doesn't seem like it actually does deter them.
>
> I
I don't watermark, but that doesn't mean that you (or anyone else
shouldn't).
I'm in the "You should only watermark images when you think it will
deter some unscrupulous asshole from stealing them" camp ... although it
doesn't seem like it actually does deter them.
I don't watermark the rare PES
David Mann wrote:
> On Oct 1, 2015, at 10:04 am, Mark Roberts wrote:
>
>> If someone does steal an image outright, removal of the watermark
>> works against them in court and can net you extra damages.
>
> If you can even get them to court, nevermind afford the lawyers to try.
There are ways to
Thanks for the replies, Ann, Igor & Mark,
The point about theft with a watermarked image is well made. I'm not sure
how practical in terms of litigation it would be for someone in one country
to try and stop the use of a stolen image in another part of the world, but
in many ways it's beside the p
On Oct 1, 2015, at 10:04 am, Mark Roberts wrote:
> If someone does steal an image outright, removal of the watermark
> works against them in court and can net you extra damages.
If you can even get them to court, nevermind afford the lawyers to try.
Cheers,
Dave
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail L
smugmug puts watermarks on my work for me on my page thereaslong as I've
specified
that for a specific gallery I'm loading a photo into- any of you who
have looked at my photos
there will note that the watermark is small... ala the way Mark does his.
On facebook, unless I really don't care ifso
I have almost the same view on watermarking images as what Mark described.
To add some details to what Mark wrote:
1. I allow people using photos with themselves for their person
non-commercial use (e.g. posting on their facebook page). In that case,
I'd like people to see who took that photo.
Malcolm Smith wrote:
>With recent discussion about pictures getting taken by unscrupulous
>individuals and passed off as their own, or being used in part of an image
>etc, what is the view of watermarking images that are posted by folk here?
>
>The views I've read seem to vary; those in the 'no' c
P.J. Alling wrote:
> Any watermark that can't be removed or cropped off, annoys the viewer
> and ruins the image. Any digital watermark that's hidden in the image
> can be stripped out. But, just ask Dave Brooks, if watermarks actually
> discourage theft.
If you display hundreds of high class i
Any watermark that can't be removed or cropped off, annoys the viewer
and ruins the image. Any digital watermark that's hidden in the image
can be stripped out. But, just ask Dave Brooks, if watermarks actually
discourage theft.
On 9/30/2015 3:36 PM, Malcolm Smith wrote:
With recent discuss
With recent discussion about pictures getting taken by unscrupulous
individuals and passed off as their own, or being used in part of an image
etc, what is the view of watermarking images that are posted by folk here?
The views I've read seem to vary; those in the 'no' camp because you should
only
12 matches
Mail list logo
