On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 2:28 AM, Alan C wrote:
> The rip-off artists are those taking sporting shots like road running.
Meep meep
>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please
The photographer's contract with the school photo company is almost
certainly "work for hire" with the photo company owning the copyrights.
That's why there are no examples of the photographer's school photo work
on his website.
On 2/21/2018 10:20, Igor PDML-StR wrote:
HAR! People with
Many thanks to all who replied to this thread.
Those replies gave me useful information as well as the spectrum of
opinions and views from other people (who know about photography).
I was especially thrilled to hear detailed stories from the "insiders",
Bill and Doug, who know the situation
That's an interesting story!
Thanks a lot for sharing, Bill!
A few quick comments:
1. I would have assumed that "our" photo outlet would be using a
standardized setting (a conveyor as you described, that removes thinking
from the process, but also reduces chances for errors).
I am content
Igor,
I am a survivor of the school photography grind as well as other strains
of the volume portrait biz. In schools I was primarily involved in
individual sets, but also tasked with group wrangling until I moved into
shooting groups as needed. Interestingly, my other duty was to track
down
On 2/21/2018 9:20 AM, Igor PDML-StR wrote:
HAR!
People with K-{1,3,5} are overqualified for that job! ;-)
BTW, regarding using their own gear:
There could be an interesting twist if the photographers are using their
own gear, especially if they are getting 1099 tax form, and not W-2
(which
HAR!
People with K-{1,3,5} are overqualified for that job! ;-)
BTW, regarding using their own gear:
There could be an interesting twist if the photographers are using their
own gear, especially if they are getting 1099 tax form, and not W-2 (which
might be the case, especially it sounds like
Again, going by my experience having my photo taken a dozen times
while I was in school, the photographer brought along a stool, a
white roll paper backdrop with stands to hold it up, the long roll
film camera and one light stand with an umbrella. The light wasn't
even a strobe.
The umbrella
On 2/21/2018 09:02, Igor PDML-StR wrote:
So, thinking about the responses from PDMLers and the information I
found myself, I realized what question I should have asked:
Does anybody know if this area of photography (children's group
photos) allow to have a reasonable business? By
Igor PDML-StR wrote:
PS. And one more question:
As Larry concluded as well, - it looks like the photographer used an
on-camera flash, most likely direct one (not bounced).
So, is it unreasonable to expect something like a couple of umbrella or
soft-box lights for this type of photographs?
PS. And one more question:
As Larry concluded as well, - it looks like the photographer used an
on-camera flash, most likely direct one (not bounced).
So, is it unreasonable to expect something like a couple of umbrella or
soft-box lights for this type of photographs?
We are talking about a
So, thinking about the responses from PDMLers and the information I found
myself, I realized what question I should have asked:
Does anybody know if this area of photography (children's group
photos) allow to have a reasonable business? By "reasonable", I mean
affordable for customers,
Around here the school photo business is mostly wrapped up by
Strawbridge Studios. They've been in business for 95 years.
They did all of my school photos from first grade through High
School senior year.
http://www.strawbridge.net/
I remember from my (pre-digital) school daze they used 70mm
The rip-off artists are those taking sporting shots like road running.
Alan C
-Original Message-
From: Igor PDML-StR
Sent: 21 February, 2018 7:24 AM
To: PDML@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Your opinion about school (group) photographs
I thought the company was some sort of a franchise with
Igor PDML-StR wrote:
So, here comes my question: On this year photograph, I see two kids with
their eyes closed, and three with their eyes not visible at all because
their glasses were totally covered by the flash reflection.
So, 5 out of 19 kids (and 3 teachers) have their eyes not
> On 21 February 2018 at 00:01 Igor PDML-StR wrote:
>
> My thinking is as follows:
> Seating-session photographs (i.e. posed) is a separate area where one
> needs to have a skill to have it right (setting, light, poses, people
> management), plus some when it concerns
I thought the company was some sort of a franchise with a few local
outlets, but upon digging, I've found that it is a well-established outlet
with one office and a studio in Austin, and just contact phones (look
like cell phones) in 5 more Texas cities, including Houston (covering
Eastern,
It's an assembly line process. The photographer maybe has 15 minutes to
get the group in, seated & settled down. He'll be lucky if he gets time
to shoot 3 frames, so approx 23% of the students with their eyes closed
ain't bad.
Probably gets better with high school students and worse with
Depends on what the photographer was paid. Probably next to nothing, so the
results are proportionate.
Paul
> On Feb 20, 2018, at 7:01 PM, Igor PDML-StR wrote:
>
>
>
> Dear PDMLers,
>
> I'd like to hear your opinion on this, especially from the point of view of
> those
Dear PDMLers,
I'd like to hear your opinion on this, especially from the point of view
of those who did/does "seating session" photography (if anybody).
We just received the annual class photograph for my child. (We usually do
not purchase individual ones, but buy group photographs, as a
20 matches
Mail list logo