The poster also posted this:
Please take note that for six shots and 17 mm, the NPP is some
millimeters backwards from the shown position.
To put it simply: the NPP is about fixed from 10 mm (four shots
around) to 17 mm (six shots around).
On 8/9/07, Toine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I found this
I found this on the panotools list:
http://michel.thoby.free.fr/Tokina_10_17/NPP-Tokina.jpg
On 8/8/07, jon carver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All,
I've been using a couple DA lenses in panoramic shots
and was hoping to compare the results of my experiment
to determine the location of the
Richard Day has posted a scan of an image taken with the DA 14 on film:
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1036message=22421936
It clearly won't work with any sensor much larger than what we have. In
my mind, this greatly diminishes the possibility that Pentax will ever
bring out
Makes a great 24x24 mm Pentax Superwide on a 35mm body ...
http://homepage.mac.com/godders/DA14FF-sq.jpg
G
On Mar 12, 2007, at 1:41 PM, Joseph Tainter wrote:
Richard Day has posted a scan of an image taken with the DA 14 on
film:
On 3/12/07, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Makes a great 24x24 mm Pentax Superwide on a 35mm body ...
http://homepage.mac.com/godders/DA14FF-sq.jpg
Which brings to mind... There's really no specific reason for DSLRs
sensors to be rectangular, except for the size of mirror and
On Mar 12, 2007, at 5:35 PM, Juan Buhler wrote:
On 3/12/07, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Makes a great 24x24 mm Pentax Superwide on a 35mm body ...
http://homepage.mac.com/godders/DA14FF-sq.jpg
Which brings to mind... There's really no specific reason for DSLRs
sensors to
Cameron Hood wrote:
http://www.pentax.co.jp/japan/news/2006/press-image/200646-05.jpg
Now if they'll just come out with quality 1.4X and 2X teleconverters
similar to the A-XS ones, that are compatible with at least the
supersonic AF, but also (hopefully) the older blade AF ...
--
Thanks,
DougF
What about DA18-55 ?
--
Thibouille
--
*ist-D,Z1,SFXn,SuperA,KX,MX, P30t and KR-10x ...
Looks like it's fine past 24mm. I've just checked it through the view
finder though.
Thibouille wrote:
What about DA18-55 ?
--
Thibouille
--
*ist-D,Z1,SFXn,SuperA,KX,MX, P30t and KR-10x ...
.
Looks like it's fine past 24mm. I've just checked it through the view
finder though.
Thibouille wrote:
What about DA18-55 ?
Thanks for checking ;)
--
Thibouille
--
*ist-D,Z1,SFXn,SuperA,KX,MX, P30t and KR-10x ...
On Feb 24, 2006, at 2:26 PM, Paweł Czarnul wrote:
1. DA 16-45
Covers 24x36 from about 22-24mm up.
5. DA 14 ??? - I assume no here.
Covers 24x24.
6. DA 40 - I have heard yes.
Many have said yes.
Godfrey
- Original Message -
From: Pawel Czarnul
Subject: DA lenses on FF
Hello All,
I would like to know which DA lenses can be used on FF (i.e. film) and
what focal lengths.
I refer to covering the entire frame. In particular:
1. DA 16-45
2. DA 10-17 FE
3. DA 12-24
4. DA 50-200
5. DA
DA 40 - I have heard yes.
I bought a DA 40mm to use on 35mm -- works fine, it's a great lens.
* UncaMikey
I am accumulating the comments as they occur. The DA lenses (and the
several other missing newer lenses) will be incorporated next time
around.
Stan
On Apr 20, 2005, at 1:10 AM, Thibouille wrote:
None of the DA lenses are on Stan's site. Is that deliberate or are
they just too recent to have
Alright, thanks for the information.
BTW I take the opportunity to thank you for your site and the work you
do. It gives a very interesting source of information on lenses.
Thanks!
2005/4/20, Stan Halpin [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I am accumulating the comments as they occur. The DA lenses (and the
Hi, Clover
I agree with you. It's not a nice colour, but I think it's traditional. The
A* lenses had a rubber ring of the same colour to mark it's asterisk-ness.
At least my 645 A* 300/4 has one.
Cheers,
Jostein
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
From: edwin
I think the answer is that the DA lenses are smaller than they would be if
they were not DA. Does anybody make a 16-45 that covers 35mm format?
Sigma's 15-35 is not exactly small.
by the same reasoning lenses in 35mm format and, say, 6x6, covering the same angle,
should be
17 matches
Mail list logo