>
> On Aug 7, 2006, at 5:21 PM, Aaron Reynolds wrote:
>
> >
> > On Aug 7, 2006, at 8:07 PM, David J Brooks wrote:
> >
> >> OTOH the D200 is fantastic, but its a consumer body, so my clients
> >> don't take me seriously,
Sorry group, should have been a smil
On Aug 7, 2006, at 5:21 PM, Aaron Reynolds wrote:
>
> On Aug 7, 2006, at 8:07 PM, David J Brooks wrote:
>
>> OTOH the D200 is fantastic, but its a consumer body, so my clients
>> don't take me seriously,
>
> Pshaw. Any client who disparages your choice of equipment is an
> idiot.
I agree comp
On Aug 7, 2006, at 8:33 PM, William Robb wrote:
> Sadly, those idiots are the same idiots that put food on your table.
C'mon now -- any client who knows enough about cameras that he can look
at Dave's D200 and think it's not a "professional" camera but will be
wowed by his D2H which is a "prof
- Original Message -
From: "Aaron Reynolds"
Subject: Re: returning to this group
>
> On Aug 7, 2006, at 8:07 PM, David J Brooks wrote:
>
>> OTOH the D200 is fantastic, but its a consumer body, so my clients
>> don't take me seriously,
>
> Psh
On Aug 7, 2006, at 8:21 PM, Aaron Reynolds wrote:
> Pshaw. Any client who disparages your choice of equipment is an idiot.
>
> The guy who runs the official Jays photo service just bought a D200.
Just to further the point -- he does the in-house photography of the
team for the team. All heads
On Aug 7, 2006, at 8:07 PM, David J Brooks wrote:
> OTOH the D200 is fantastic, but its a consumer body, so my clients
> don't take me seriously,
Pshaw. Any client who disparages your choice of equipment is an idiot.
The guy who runs the official Jays photo service just bought a D200.
-Aaron
Every shot is different.Over exposed, underesposed, wb differneces,
all on the same fence in a matter of seconds.
Less than 10,000 shutters i had to replace the AE board, twice in for
metering problems and then the shutter went at 9800 actuations.
Need i say more.
lol
OTOH the D200 is fanta
Everyone I know with a D2H seriously hates it -- was it a notorious dog?
-Aaron
-Original Message-
From: David J Brooks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I;m looking for something to replace my D2h which i
hate.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml
is in heavier build and the AF-S motor).
>
> The 400 f2.8 on the other hand...
>
>>
>
> --
>
>
> Message: 8
> Date: Sun, 06 Aug 2006 12:57:09 -0400
> From: David J Brooks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: returning
Quoting IVAN SHUKSTER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> My name is Ivan and I live in Medicine Hat Alberta. I was a member
> of this list briefly last summer.
Welcome back.
> I can buy a Pentex DSLR and upgrade some of my lenses and keep the
> MZ5n or buy a Nikon D200 (one of which I do have on order
The 12-24 won't be that expensive to match, the Pentax 12-24 is
significantly cheaper than the Nikon but performs just as well (The
extra cost in the Nikon is in heavier build and the AF-S motor).
The 400 f2.8 on the other hand...
-Adam
Bob Sullivan wrote:
> Ivan,
>
> Welcome back. I think
Ivan,
Welcome back. I think you have a problem with all your optional glass.
I'm sure the 12-24 Nikkor and 400 f2.8 are spoiling you. ;-)
They will be expensive to duplicate in Pentax gear.
I have a Pentax Ds and played a bit with my nephew's new K100D yesterday.
I didn't get much of a read on t
My name is Ivan and I live in Medicine Hat Alberta. I was a member of this list
briefly last summer.
I first began using Pentax i 1973 and bought my first one , a Spotmatic F which
I stil have, the next year. Eventually my wife and I had two Spotmatic Fs with
a bunch of lenses most of which we t
13 matches
Mail list logo
