Your own choice... serve your country well and they'll give you special
permit for Four Seasons underwear...
:)
BR, Margus
John Sessoms wrote:
From: Peter Loveday [EMAIL PROTECTED]
No, you may continue to wear your Months of the Year underwear.
But they must be numbered by week as well.
Nah. You're Canadian. If it's warm and if it ain't wet, just stay cozy.
Regards
Bob...
---
I don't mind if you don't like my manners.
I don't like them myself. They're pretty bad.
I grieve over them long winter evenings.
-- Philip
Oh well, don't know about the US but over here your life expectancy is
10mn on the emergency lane on a highway ... and we still wouldn't be
wearing seatbelts if it weren't for the nanny ...
since july 1st any driver must have this kind of flashy yellow vest in
the car . Hence the ad
No, you may continue to wear your Months of the Year underwear.
Regards
Bob...
---
I don't mind if you don't like my manners.
I don't like them myself. They're pretty bad.
I grieve over them long winter evenings.
-- Philip Marlowe
- Original Message -
From: Bob Blakely
Subject: Re: the nanny state continues to grow ...
No, you may continue to wear your Months of the Year underwear.
But they must be numbered by week as well.
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net
No, you may continue to wear your Months of the Year underwear.
But they must be numbered by week as well.
So you're telling me we have to change them _every week_ now?!
- Peter
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE
- Original Message -
From: Peter Loveday
Subject: Re: the nanny state continues to grow ...
No, you may continue to wear your Months of the Year underwear.
But they must be numbered by week as well.
Or be a rebel.
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
From: Peter Loveday [EMAIL PROTECTED]
No, you may continue to wear your Months of the Year underwear.
But they must be numbered by week as well.
So you're telling me we have to change them _every week_ now?!
Yup ... whether you need to or not.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
On 24/10/08, Boris Liberman, discombobulated, unleashed:
Although, I should say that last two weeks were especially bloody on
Israeli roads, at least half-dozen hit-and-run-away accidents all
endings in death or severe injury of the victim.
Yiddish photogs are especially despised.
;-)
When i started in surveying in 1973, safety was non existent. I
remember trying to check some girder levels at the resturant level of
the CN Tower. No glass in yet. My tie off was my party chief holding
on to my belt, as i leaned over to hold the level rod. I forget what
the height is of the
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Oct 24, 2008, at 3:25 PM, John Sessoms wrote:
http://www.nppa.org/news_and_events/news/2008/10/safety.html
I hate this stuff.
I hate it when it becomes law - too over the top.
Yes, exactly. I have nothing against being safe and visible.
Godfrey, from outside of US of A, your sentiment appears more towards
the overreacting end of the spectrum.
Although, I should say that last two weeks were especially bloody on
Israeli roads, at least half-dozen hit-and-run-away accidents all
endings in death or severe injury of the victim.
'60's Pogo comic strip for sure.
One of the lasting truths from the cartoonists.
Regards, Bob S.
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 10:23 PM, John Sessoms [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Bob Blakely [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Well, we - as a nation - keep voting nannys into office. We have no one to
blame but
Thanks for your concerned comment.
G
On Oct 24, 2008, at 4:24 AM, Boris Liberman wrote:
Godfrey, from outside of US of A, your sentiment appears more
towards the overreacting end of the spectrum.
Although, I should say that last two weeks were especially bloody on
Israeli roads, at least
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Oct 23, 2008, at 1:48 PM, Cotty wrote:
http://www.nppa.org/news_and_events/news/2008/10/safety.html
I hate this stuff.
I hate it when it becomes law - too over the top.
Yes, exactly. I have nothing against being safe and visible. But
On Oct 24, 2008, at 3:25 PM, John Sessoms wrote:
http://www.nppa.org/news_and_events/news/2008/10/safety.html
I hate this stuff.
I hate it when it becomes law - too over the top.
Yes, exactly. I have nothing against being safe and visible. But
declaring it a law and threatening
[...]
Next thing you know, they'll make it mandatory for all the
automobile manufacturers to install seat-belts.
Indeed. And airbags too.
Soon they'll tell you what sort of underpants you can wear, and when.
G
They've already installed CCTV in my underpants.
Bob
--
PDML
On 10/24/08, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 24, 2008, at 3:25 PM, John Sessoms wrote:
http://www.nppa.org/news_and_events/news/2008/10/safety.html
I hate this stuff.
I hate it when it becomes law - too over the top.
Yes,
On Oct 24, 2008, at 18:46, Scott Loveless wrote:
Are you saying I don't absolutely have to wear days-of-the-week
underwear?
Just make sure that the animal on the underwear label matches the
animal on the shirt label and you'll be fine.
-Charles
--
Charles Robinson - [EMAIL
- Original Message -
From: Bob W
Subject: RE: the nanny state continues to grow ...
They've already installed CCTV in my underpants.
And we just thought you were happy all the time
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo
http://www.nppa.org/news_and_events/news/2008/10/safety.html
I hate this stuff.
G
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.nppa.org/news_and_events/news/2008/10/safety.html
I hate this stuff.
Come on. Even Lagerfeld wears one...
http://blog.patricegabin.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/jaunetmoche.jpg
The copy says: It's yellow, it's shabby, it doesn't
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
http://www.nppa.org/news_and_events/news/2008/10/safety.html
I hate this stuff.
G
I guess requiring drivers to pay attention is out of the question.
Also, if everyone else is wearing one of these things and you're not,
wouldn't you be the most visible?
--
PDML
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 3:17 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.nppa.org/news_and_events/news/2008/10/safety.html
I hate this stuff.
Personally, I think those vests look rather jaunty.
;-)
Okay, seriously, you wouldn't catch me dead in one of those. Perhaps
dead
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 3:56 PM, Doug Brewer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I guess requiring drivers to pay attention is out of the question.
Also, if everyone else is wearing one of these things and you're not,
wouldn't you be the most visible?
I'm always visible due to the aluminium foil helmet
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 03:56:58PM -0400, frank theriault wrote:
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 3:17 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.nppa.org/news_and_events/news/2008/10/safety.html
I hate this stuff.
Personally, I think those vests look rather jaunty.
;-)
On 10/23/08, frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't think this has anything to do with any nanny states though.
My take is that it's about federal versus state funding and about who
bears liability in the event of an incident. It's about an overly
litigious society that has to
On 23/10/08, Godfrey DiGiorgi, discombobulated, unleashed:
http://www.nppa.org/news_and_events/news/2008/10/safety.html
I hate this stuff.
I hate it when it becomes law - too over the top.
I carry a hi-vis vest that I wear when working on roads or highways -
I'd rather be seen and not hit! I
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 4:45 PM, Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's about the Fed passing yet another law that puts the financial
burden of enforcement on the States. It's a strong arm tactic.
Either you enforce it, or we pull your highway funding.
Unfortunately, most States just
frank theriault wrote:
Okay, seriously, you wouldn't catch me dead in one of those.
http://cwaters.smugmug.com/gallery/2793835_9yqag#149023483_6kmS2-A-LB
Wished I'd had a reflective orange vest when this bloke was bearing down
on me...
CW
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
John Francis wrote:
Unfortunately it gives the cops yet another excuse to harass you if
you try and take photographs of anything going on.
That may, in fact, be the point...
:(
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from
On 10/23/08, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
John Francis wrote:
Unfortunately it gives the cops yet another excuse to harass you if
you try and take photographs of anything going on.
That may, in fact, be the point...
:(
So you tag team them. Show up in pairs and approach
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 4:57 PM, Cory Waters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
frank theriault wrote:
Okay, seriously, you wouldn't catch me dead in one of those.
http://cwaters.smugmug.com/gallery/2793835_9yqag#149023483_6kmS2-A-LB
Wished I'd had a reflective orange vest when this bloke was
frank theriault wrote:
Okay, seriously, you wouldn't catch me dead in one of those.
http://cwaters.smugmug.com/gallery/2793835_9yqag#149023483_6kmS2-A-LB
Wished I'd had a reflective orange vest when this bloke was bearing down
on me...
CW
Looks like you shave your legs and stick the
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 05:06:03PM -0400, Scott Loveless wrote:
On 10/23/08, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
John Francis wrote:
Unfortunately it gives the cops yet another excuse to harass you if
you try and take photographs of anything going on.
That may, in fact, be
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 5:11 PM, Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Looks like you shave your legs and stick the trimmings on your face.
There are a few things:
a) I didn't shave my legs this year for the first time in about 8
years - I think my smooth-legged days are behind me,
b) I was
From: Doug Brewer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
http://www.nppa.org/news_and_events/news/2008/10/safety.html
I hate this stuff.
G
I guess requiring drivers to pay attention is out of the question.
Being more visible to drivers who ARE paying attention might help them
From: frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 3:17 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.nppa.org/news_and_events/news/2008/10/safety.html
I hate this stuff.
Personally, I think those vests look rather jaunty.
;-)
Okay, seriously, you wouldn't
From: frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm always visible due to the aluminium foil helmet that I wear to
ward off alien radio waves...
cheers,
frank
Geez Frank, get with the program.
Everybody knows aluminum foil is useless for that sort of thing. NASA or
NSA or NRA, did a study years
Message -
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: the nanny state continues to grow ...
http://www.nppa.org/news_and_events/news/2008/10/safety.html
I hate this stuff.
G
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE
On the other hand, glass half-full and all that, if you do have one of the
vests then you are more likely to blend in and be ignored in a variety of
situations. The vest will make you look like you belong there.
Paul
-Original Message-
Well, we - as a nation - keep voting nannys into office. We have no one to
blame but orselves.
We have met the enemy and he is us!
Walt Kelly, on a 1970 anti-pollution poster for Earth Day.
Regards
Bob...
---
I don't mind if you
2008/10/24 frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 3:17 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.nppa.org/news_and_events/news/2008/10/safety.html
I hate this stuff.
Personally, I think those vests look rather jaunty.
;-)
Okay, seriously, you wouldn't
-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: the nanny state continues to grow ...
Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.nppa.org/news_and_events/news/2008/10/safety.html
I hate this stuff.
Come on. Even Lagerfeld wears one...
http://blog.patricegabin.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/06
On 10/23/08, John Coyle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Note too, that the French text at the foot of the page reads:
Vest and triangle are becoming compulsory in every vehicle. Get them now.
I specifically remember triangles and first-aid kits being required in
Germany during the 80s. Wonder what
- Original Message -
From: Bob Blakely
Subject: Re: the nanny state continues to grow ...
Well, we - as a nation - keep voting nannys into office. We have no one to
blame but orselves.
We keep voting in lawyers.
They are even worse.
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
From: Bob Blakely [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Well, we - as a nation - keep voting nannys into office. We have no one to
blame but orselves.
We have met the enemy and he is us!
Walt Kelly, on a 1970 anti-pollution poster for Earth Day.
I remember it from a 60s Pogo strip ... re-cycled for that
On Oct 23, 2008, at 1:48 PM, Cotty wrote:
http://www.nppa.org/news_and_events/news/2008/10/safety.html
I hate this stuff.
I hate it when it becomes law - too over the top.
Yes, exactly. I have nothing against being safe and visible. But
declaring it a law and threatening highway
48 matches
Mail list logo
