> I'd agree that the error is no big deal, if tolerance really meant "plus or
> minus." It doesn't. When was the last time you read a test report that
> found that a lens gave you more of what you thought you paid for? A 20 mm
> that measured at 19.4 mm? A 200 mm that gave you 205 mm? An f/2 t
I'd agree that the error is no big deal, if tolerance really meant "plus or
minus." It doesn't. When was the last time you read a test report that
found that a lens gave you more of what you thought you paid for? A 20 mm
that measured at 19.4 mm? A 200 mm that gave you 205 mm? An f/2 that was
2 matches
Mail list logo
