2010/3/16 Boris Liberman :
>> 2010/3/16 Boris Liberman:
>>> I use it fairly often when photographing kids in Galia's class - it
>>> eliminates
>>> eye shadows, adds a bit of sprinkle to the eyes and generally is useful.
>>
>> Um...
>> Cry a lot, do they? :-)
>>
>
> Oh... After fifth reading of you
On 3/16/2010 1:03 PM, AlunFoto wrote:
2010/3/16 Boris Liberman:
I use it fairly often when photographing kids in Galia's class - it eliminates
eye shadows, adds a bit of sprinkle to the eyes and generally is useful.
Um...
Cry a lot, do they? :-)
Jostein
Oh... After fifth reading of your
I've never used a Metz, but I used to have a Cullman with a second reflector.
I found this handy. Not for catch light, but to avoid raccoon eyes
when bouncing flash from above the subject.
--
MaritimTim
http://maritimtim.blogspot.com/
2010/3/8 Igor Roshchin :
>
>
> Hi All,
>
> I was trying to
2010/3/16 Boris Liberman :
> I use it fairly often when photographing kids in Galia's class - it
> eliminates
> eye shadows, adds a bit of sprinkle to the eyes and generally is useful.
Um...
Cry a lot, do they? :-)
Jostein
--
http://www.alunfoto.no/galleri/
http://alunfoto.blogspot.com
--
P
On 3/8/2010 2:55 AM, Igor Roshchin wrote:
Additionally:
3. How useful is the second reflector (source) when you tilt/swivel
the flash head?
My old Metz 40MZ-2 (or something like this) has a secondary light
source. It also has two slide on gray filters to control the output of
this source. I u
I have both of these also; I'd find it hard to split them, they both perform
well.
The secondary reflector is handy for catchlights, esp. when you can't use
the bounce card thing because you're bouncing off a wall at an odd angle.
I don't really find either menu system particularly more diffi
Tomek and Jostein,
Thanks a lot for sharing your opinions!
Igor
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
2010/3/8 Igor Roshchin :
> Since you have both,
> if you were choosing between Metz 58A and Pentax 540 FGZ -
> which one and why would you choose?
Actually I like the Metz best, partly because of the extra tube for
CC. Since I got the Pentax back I haven't tested them head to head, so
I dunno abou
Jostein,
Thank you for your response.
Since you have both,
if you were choosing between Metz 58A and Pentax 540 FGZ -
which one and why would you choose?
Thank you,
Igor
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PD
Over here the Metz is cheaper than the Pentax.
I have both because I had to buy a replacement for the Pentax, then
got the Pentax repaired anyway.
1. Can't say the menu stuff bothers me. Depends on how much you need to fiddle.
2. I have only used it on K-7. It works fine there.
3. AFAIK there's
On 08-03-2010 01:55, Igor Roshchin wrote:
Additionally:
3. How useful is the second reflector (source) when you tilt/swivel
the flash head?
I haven't used the new "USB" Metz flashes, so can't comment on AF58
usability, but I used several of the earlier big (40MZ.., 54MZ..) models
on Pentax b
Hi All,
I was trying to place an order for a Pentax AF 540 FGZ flash, when
I discovered that Metz 58 AF-1PS costs just $15 more.
I've never had experience with any Metz flashes.
Two main concerns that I have:
1. From what I read, all control is done via "soft" buttons, - e.g.
via contextual
12 matches
Mail list logo
