God, I hate Outlook. Piece of$^%$$&!!!
http://vil.mcafee.com/dispVirus.asp?virus_k=99040&;
You need the '&' in the link.
Tom C.
- Original Message -
From: "John Mustarde" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, Nove
tarde" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, November 22, 2001 2:47 PM
Subject: Re: OT: Virus Question
> On Wed, 21 Nov 2001 11:38:11 -0700, you wrote:
>
> >Sometimes, not all the time, when I move the mouse
> >pointer towards an icon
On Wed, 21 Nov 2001 11:38:11 -0700, you wrote:
>Sometimes, not all the time, when I move the mouse
>pointer towards an icon it repls it across the screen, like magnets with
>same poles pointing towards one another.
I saw a program once that caused the pointer to repel icons and other
strange beh
tty weird. When I move the
> mouse pointer around the desktop, the icons would start flipping around
> slot-machine fashion. Sometimes, not all the time, when I move the mouse
> pointer towards an icon it repls it across the screen, like magnets with
> same poles pointing towards o
l the time, when I move the mouse
pointer towards an icon it repls it across the screen, like magnets with
same poles pointing towards one another.
Sound like a virus? My version of Antivirus doesn't find anything. I
checked MS site for symptoms and found a note. I deleted the shelliconcach
I am glad to see you fixed it, and are joining us again!
Frits Wüthrich
jeepgirl:
> To the best of my knowledge it is fixed. I am terribly sorry It wasn't
> caught sooner, my humble apologies to anyone that might have been caused
> trouble by it. I got it from the econ teacher in my masters
>
> By the way, I was looking for some Pentax-related information on the Web
> yesterday and came across some page of yours containing a very nice
article
> on wedding photography. Nice job! You covered a lot of material.
But the credit for that is not all mine. I just took all the messages from
"Peifer, William [OCDUS]" wrote:
>
> Tom Van Veen wrote:
> > "Peifer, William [OCDUS]" wrote:
> >
> >> By the way, I was looking for some Pentax-related information on the Web
> >> yesterday and came across some page of yours containing a very nice
> article
> >> on wedding photography. Nice job
Tom Van Veen wrote:
> "Peifer, William [OCDUS]" wrote:
>
>> By the way, I was looking for some Pentax-related information on the Web
>> yesterday and came across some page of yours containing a very nice
article
>> on wedding photography. Nice job! You covered a lot of material.
> Really? Wher
"Peifer, William [OCDUS]" wrote:
>
> By the way, I was looking for some Pentax-related information on the Web
> yesterday and came across some page of yours containing a very nice article
> on wedding photography. Nice job! You covered a lot of material.
Really? Where is that?
tv
-
This messa
...
> Zonealarm isolated it the second time as well. This time I just deleted it,
> instead of having McAfee figuring out if it is safe or not, and what the
> virus is.
>
> Frits Wüthrich
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net
- Original Message -
From: "Frits J. Wüthrich"
Subject: RE: OT Virus
> I emailed her directly, to inform her about it, but only got a
new virus
> from her.
At least she cares...
WW
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://
I emailed her directly, to inform her about it, but only got a new virus
from her. Well, from her machine.
Frits Wüthrich
Robert Harris:
>
> Frank Theriault wrote:
>
> > ... this
> > virus is obviously sending stuff out from her e-mail address without her
> > knowl
I received it for the second time from Jeepgirl, so perhaps after all I can
feel honoured...
Zonealarm isolated it the second time as well. This time I just deleted it,
instead of having McAfee figuring out if it is safe or not, and what the
virus is.
Frits Wüthrich
John Coyle:
> Jeepg
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of John Coyle
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 12:59 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: OT Virus
Yeah, right. Is there anything later than 6 days ago?
I did say I was using the latest set, and this thing has been around for
months.
Maybe they
]]
wrote:
> John Coyle wrote:
> >Norton's nor ZoneAlarm stopped it
>
> Norton stopped it on my machine, perhaps you should get an update to your
> virus definitions.
>
> Regards,
> /\/\ick...
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go t
At 04:57 AM 9/19/2001 -0400, you wrote:
>Does this mean there really are no nipples? You mean it was all a hoax?
>:(
No Ed, there *are* nipples, you just have to know where to look.
tv
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the
Does this mean there really are no nipples? You mean it was all a hoax?
:(
Thanks,
Ed
http://lightandsilver.com
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pu
William, that must have been a virus activity. It
probably works by sending a copy of itself through
email to email addresses that reside in the user's
address book. They seem to attack Microsoft Outlook
users most.
Jason ("Rapture") probably has your email and PDML
email stored
I saw that subject line and the sender and deleted
immediately!
annsan
Paul Jones wrote:
>
> Maybe you have a virus :)
> - Original Message -
> From: "Rapture" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2001 2:58 PM
> Subject: There, this is fo
ould cease.
But when we disarmed they sold us,
and delivered us, bound, to our foe.
And the gods of the copybook headings said,
'Stick to the devil you know.' "
--Rudyard Kipling
From: "Paul Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Maybe you have a virus :)
> From:
Maybe you have a virus :)
- Original Message -
From: "Rapture" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2001 2:58 PM
Subject: There, this is for your souvenir,.
> I blankly received the thing . it was a brownish round patch.
> Selina stood up and whispered
I get 3-4 e-mail DAILY that contain a bug of some flavor.
I get 2-3 alerts a week from someone passing along info that ranges from
valid, to a bogus hoax that's been making the rounds for the last
decade.
Sometimes, the URL given to "learn more" about the nasty being described
is simply a site t
day, May 31, 2001 2:58 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Fwd: Fw: [Fwd: Fw: virus]]
>
>
> It's a fraud.Your computer needs this file.My freind
> deleted it and
> had to reinstall it on his hard drive.He later
> apologized for sending
> it to his buddies
>
It is a MicroSoft file installed when WIN 98 was put on your hard drive.
Size should be 45065 Has NOT A THING to do with a virus.
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2001 1:00 PM
Subject: Re: [Fwd: Fw: [Fw
[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [Fwd: Fw: [Fwd: Fw: virus]]
well, I just found that file on my hard drive. deleted it too, but
I'll
keep checking until june 1st :-( !
zvi wrote:
> -Original Message-
> From: Matilda Cohen Sarano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g
Gerald Lewis writes:
> This is from Lockheed-Martin at the Johnson Space Center and we
> received it in our internal mail just a little while ago.
[...]
> If you have erroneously deleted SULFNBK.EXE, contact the Enterprise Service
> Desk at or your local desktop support for assistance.
Enterpr
Those are Microsoft's dates from creating the Windows file.
Maris
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2001 1:00 PM
Subject: Re: [Fwd: Fw: [Fwd: Fw: virus]]
Interesting question here..just checked a computer that has no int
SULFNBK.EXE because
"NO anti-virus software can detect this virus." (The use of the name
SULFNBK.EXE is coincidental. A virus can have any Windows file name;
there's nothing special about SULFNBK.EXE.) DO NOT delete this file from
your PC. It is not detected as a virus IF it
That is actually a Window system file.
>From the Norton Website:
"This particular email message is a hoax. The file that is
mentioned in the hoax, however, Sulfnbk.exe, is a Microsoft
Windows utility that is used to restore long file names, and
like any .exe file, it can be infected by
roduction of the messages. Please refer to the list whenever you receive
what appears to be a bogus message regarding a new virus, promotion, or the
like."
[SNIP]
SULFNBK.EXE
[SNIP]
Paul M. Provencher, Senior Systems Engineer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Daphne [
On Fri, 27 Apr 2001 12:00:58 +1000, Paul Jones wrote:
>Outlook has the feature of being able to pick up mail from a hotmail
>account, does PMMail have this?
Not sure about hotmail since it's a MS thing. I've got five different accounts setup
in PMMail which all have
their own folders keeping
Seems that the Trojan horse/virus writers have concluded that phony
photo attachments are the thing that will get people to execute them. A
new one has started the rounds, and undoubtedly will hit someone on this
list who might then pass it on to all of us since it spreads by using
the Outlook
. :)
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
>
[snip]
>
> When this virus sends itself via email, it could be one of the
> following
> file names, randomly picked:
>
[snip]
> TIAZINHA.JPG.pif
> WIN_$100_NOW.DOC.pif
> YOU_are_FAT!.TXT.pif
> zipped_files.EXE
Bob
-
This message is from the
list.
=Virus Found===
Scan Result:
Name of File: Sorry_about_yesterday.DOC.pif
Type of File: application/octet-stream
Scan Result: Virus W95.MTX.dr found. File NOT
cleaned.
This file is infected with a computer virus, a
program that can spread to many
ulti-faceted. I still feel that
saying one can get a virus by simply opening an email is an
over-simplification of
a partial truth. What is meant by that statement? Should a person then never
open an email, never preview one, never then open an attachment?
Listen, one cannot get a virus from simply
ulti-faceted. I still feel that
saying one can get a virus by simply opening an email is an
over-simplification of
a partial truth. What is meant by that statement? Should a person then never
open an email, never preview one, never then open an attachment?
Listen, one cannot get a virus from simply
ulti-faceted. I still feel that
saying one can get a virus by simply opening an email is an
over-simplification of
a partial truth. What is meant by that statement? Should a person then never
open an email, never preview one, never then open an attachment?
Listen, one cannot get a virus from simply
ulti-faceted. I still feel that
saying one can get a virus by simply opening an email is an
over-simplification of
a partial truth. What is meant by that statement? Should a person then never
open an email, never preview one, never then open an attachment?
Listen, one cannot get a virus from simply
On Fri, 9 Feb 2001 16:08:18 -0800, Steve Larson wrote:
> That would be me. It could be B.S., I don`t know. I heard it on news radio
>KCBS on the "World News Roundup" at the top of each hour about 2 weeks
>or a month ago. Myself, I`m not paranoid of viruses. If a virus wiped ou
Skip wrote:
> Someone has mentioned here on this list that one can get a virus (or worm,
> or trojan) just by opening e-mail. This is, I believe, one of the many
> unfounded, slightly paranoid, rumors about viruses. (Virii?)
Hi Skip,
That would be me. It could be B.S., I don`t know
dosk wrote:
>
> > > Someone has mentioned here on this list that one can get a virus (or worm,
> > > or trojan) just by opening e-mail. This is, I believe, one of the many
> > > unfounded, slightly paranoid, rumors about viruses. (Virii?)
> >
> > I assu
> > Someone has mentioned here on this list that one can get a virus (or
worm,
> > or trojan) just by opening e-mail. This is, I believe, one of the many
> > unfounded, slightly paranoid, rumors about viruses. (Virii?)
>
> I assure you that both the statements made
ays enable
> extension display in Windows no matter what version I
> am using.
>
I have downloaded an update for my Outlook98 which will block all dangerous
attachments. The virus we got was blocked because of this, even if I want to
open it I might not be able to do it.
Not showing the la
Don't be too harsh with him, Bob. After all, but for him sending around
the virus -- by accident, I assume -- we non-Brazilians never would have
discovered the real Tiazinha.
Bob
Bob Blakely wrote:
>
> Bad boy. No cookie.
>
> Har!
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discu
It probably wasn't your fault. Once you become inflected, many virus just
attach themselves to your out going mail... WITHOUT your knowledge.
- Original Message -
From: "dick graham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2001
dosk wrote:
>
> Outlook Express users, do not despair..
>
> Someone has mentioned here on this list that one can get a virus (or worm,
> or trojan) just by opening e-mail. This is, I believe, one of the many
> unfounded, slightly paranoid, rumors about viruses. (Virii?)
My apologies to all, I was the SOB that inadvertently sent the virus out
earlier this week. My humblest apologies to all. I have been "de-loused"
so everything I send should be fine now.
DG
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pd
Outlook Express users, do not despair..
Someone has mentioned here on this list that one can get a virus (or worm,
or trojan) just by opening e-mail. This is, I believe, one of the many
unfounded, slightly paranoid, rumors about viruses. (Virii?)
Email comes through to a Microsoft O/S
Hi John,
On Thu, 8 Feb 2001 18:38:31 +1000, John Coyle wrote:
> You get to it from Windows Explorer:
> Click View/Folder Options/View
> Then find the Item "Hidden Files" and check "Show all files" on
> Then uncheck "Hide file extensions for known file types"
> Then click on the "Like current fol
On Wed, 7 Feb 2001 21:27:04 -0800 (PST), Peter Alling wrote:
> I guess that means that there isn't a lot you can do
> for people using Outlook Express. Or can you change
> that option to allow the final extension to be
> displayed?
The setting isn't specific to Outlook (or Goatlook as my budd
s is tacking
> the following lines on your message (I put it in a
> box to disarm it):
>
> /-\
> | begin present.txt.vbs |
> | Hi, I'm a signature virus. Copy me! |
> | end |
> \
On Wed, 7 Feb 2001 20:33:49 -0600, Dan Scott wrote:
>You won the toss, Chris! I'm keeping my both of my teeth. It'll be
>interesting to see if there's another Pentaxian in town. Hmm, maybe that
>should be PenTexian...
Yup, in Burleson. Just south of Fort Worth.
Later,
Gary
-
This message i
On Wed, 7 Feb 2001, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
> That would be very interesting to know, and possibly useful as well.
> Is there anyone with the time, ability and interest to run a
> geographic poll?
Well, seeing how I just had all 4 wisdom teeth removed, I'm going to have
a lot of spare time fo
Sure. Send me an email off list with "geographic poll" in the subject line
and your city/country/personal name or handle in the body.
Dan Scott
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Daniel J. Matyola:
>That would be very interesting to know, and possibly useful as well. Is there
>anyone with the time, ability
Things happen. Thanks for letting us know.
Maris
- Original Message -
From: "Otis Wright, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2001 2:40 PM
Subject: Re: TIAZINHA.JPG.pif attachement is a virus
| No, but it took me abo
On Wed, 7 Feb 2001, Dan Scott wrote:
> Sure. Send me an email off list with "geographic poll" in the subject line
> and your city/country/personal name or handle in the body.
Flip a coin for it? :) I'll call "tails."
chris
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe
"Alexandre A. P. Suaide" wrote:
> By the way. how is our PDML members distributed over the world?
> We can do the same we do for the camera bodies and lenses
> I know I am not the only brazilian in this list
That would be very interesting to know, and possibly useful as well. Is th
>Maris
> >
> >- Original Message -
> >From: "Alexandre A. P. Suaide" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2001 9:02 AM
> >Subject: Re: TIAZINHA.JPG.pif attachement is a virus
> >
&
Dan Scott wrote:
> [snip]...seems like all the action is happening in Slovenia and
> Brazil--how'd we get stuck out here in the boondocks?)
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You mean Brazil and Slovenia are the places where the interesting bodies
are to be found, and there is nothing suitable in Texas?
-
This
lly correct to say about this.
>
>Maris
>
>- Original Message -
>From: "Alexandre A. P. Suaide" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2001 9:02 AM
>Subject: Re: TIAZINHA.JPG.pif attachement is a virus
>
herbet brasileiro wrote:
> ...The word TIAZINHA... is very appealing to the
> portuguese (Brazilian) and maybe also to the spanish
> speaking internet users.
Do you really think the appeal has anything to do with the language she
speaks?
Bob
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail Lis
John Francis wrote:
>
> In fact, you *must* see the show.
> Failure to do so willl be . . . . punished.
I would love to see the show -- it would give me great reason to turn on
the TV. But it seems I have to go to Brazil to see it, and that is about
as difficult for me as going to Slovenia t
A stupid way to scare the bejeezus out of OE users is tacking
the following lines on your message (I put it in a box to disarm it):
/-\
| begin present.txt.vbs |
| Hi, I'm a signature virus. Copy me! |
| end |
\--
Norm B wrote:
>I got it too. Does anyone on the list know who Tiazinha is?
I think it's something to do with Canon... :~)
Collin
***
"The accumulation of all powers legislative,
executive and judiciary in the same hands . . .
may justly be pronounced the very definition of tyranny.
Otis Wright, Jr. asks:
> Subject: Re: TIAZINHA.JPG.pif attachement is a virus
>
> What is the cure?
Install Linux Oh wait, that's the stock answer on a _different_
mailing list.
-- Glenn, wh
dosk wrote some useful advice, and then:
> [...] anti-virus program detected them, warned me about them,
> then deleted the entire *&@#$%* messages before their sick senders could
> infect my system...
It's unlikely that the people from whom we've received these
vir
--- Ann Sanfedele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I dunno but probably something like
> "Thanks In Advance Zombies [of the] INternet[ for
> falling for this] Hoax
> Again"
No, not close. Norm got it right.
These virus are sent through JPG files using appealing
n
IronWorks wrote:
>
> I have nothing politically correct to say about this.
You could simply say that it is very gratifying to see that a young
woman, still a student, with such obvious talents can achieve great
success at an early age.
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To uns
Norman Baugher wrote:
>
> From: Robert Harris
> >
> > But that is not the Tiazinha that tried to infect our computers. I
> > suspect that many folks here would be less quick to delete her. :)
>
> You should see the show ;-)
In fact, you *must* see the show.
Failure to do so willl be . . . .
"Alexandre A. P. Suaide" wrote:
>
> Hello all
>
> Tiazinha is a female brazilian TV character with a strong
> sexual connotation. It seems to be also a virus
>
> go to http://216.167.122.5/minhatiazinha/index.asp and
> see her.
Thank you for the correct
Norman Baugher wrote:
> I got it too. Does anyone on the list know who Tiazinha is?
> Norm
>
I dunno but probably something like
"Thanks In Advance Zombies [of the] INternet[ for falling for this] Hoax
Again"
Not that we fell for it - no one here actually go infected did they?
annsan
-
This
I have nothing politically correct to say about this.
Maris
- Original Message -
From: "Alexandre A. P. Suaide" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2001 9:02 AM
Subject: Re: TIAZINHA.JPG.pif attachement is a virus
| Hello
For those who are interested in the details:
My Norton AV caught it and reported it to be the W95MTX.dr virus, which is
described at http://www.hig.se/~dhe/security/sec00/WarnVirus.htm as follows:
"This virus is spread by E-mail to Windows 95 systems. If you receive double
E-mails, even
Norman Baugher wrote:
>
> Wrong. Tiazinha is the official national dominatrix
> of Brazil.
> A quick search brought up this for you in English
> http://www.askmen.com/women/models/39_tiazinha.html
> Norm
> From: Robert Harris
> > Norman Baugher wrote:
But that is not the Tiazinha that tried
From: Robert Harris
> Norman Baugher wrote:
> >
> > Wrong. Tiazinha is the official national
dominatrix
> > of Brazil.
> > A quick search brought up this for you in English
> > http://www.askmen.com/women/models/39_tiazinha.html
> > Norm
> > From: Robert Harris
> > > Norman Baugher wrote:
>
> Bu
--- Original Message -
From: "Michel Adam" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2001 1:03 AM
Subject: Re: VIRUS
|
| Speaking of filtering the mail, are you using Outlook Express on a Mac or
PC?
|
| If on PC, do you have a foolproof set of
Word)
.doc //Microsoft word document can contain
macros including MS Word Macro
Viruses)
--- Eric Ming Hui <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The attachment is a virus!
> DO NOT RUN IT!
>
> -
> This messa
hould give them a call..
BTW, more info on the W95.MTX virus sent to this list can be found at:
http://vil.mcafee.com/dispVirus.asp?virus_k=98797&;
Marcel Eijdems
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don&#x
]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2001 10:06 PM
Subject: Re: VIRUS
> Yep Frank, both message from Dick and Rusty came through my filters in Outlook
>Express as well. I do the same thing as
well, I filter messages from all my mailing list into separate folders to keep my
inbox relatively clear.
cis caused thus to appear:
>Shel Belinkoff wrote:
>>
>> Are these people even list members. I can't help but think
>> someone's set this up to spam our list members and those of
>> other lists.
>
>It's not that sophisticated. The virus propagates
Yes - I received one non-filtered and one filtered to the group.
Maris
- Original Message -
From: "Vadim Meleshuk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2001 5:30 PM
Subject: Re: VIRUS
| > Anyone else have this "non-filt
dosk wrote:
>
> And even if there is a subject, it is always better to load any attachments
> to disk before you even think about opening them. (Especially if you don't
> recognize the senders...) That way your anti-virus program (assuming you
> have one, and you really shou
On 6 Feb 2001, at 16:09, John Francis wrote:
> Shel Belinkoff wrote:
> >
> > Are these people even list members. I can't help but think
> > someone's set this up to spam our list members and those of
> > other lists.
>
> It's not that sophi
TIAZINHA.JPG.pif
--
Shel Belinkoff
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
My best work is often almost unconscious
and occurs ahead of my ability to understand it."
-Sam Abell; "Stay This Moment"
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the di
diately
deleted both messages. If you receive ANY "non-subject" mail from ANYONE,
(with only attachments), DO NOT OPEN THE ATTACHMENTS. That is how this MTX
virus gets infiltrated.
And even if there is a subject, it is always better to load any attachments
to disk before you even think a
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
>
> Are these people even list members. I can't help but think
> someone's set this up to spam our list members and those of
> other lists.
It's not that sophisticated. The virus propagates by the tried-and-
true method of spoofing email addr
> Mr. Graham, below, didn't get filtered
> off.
>
> Anyone else have this "non-filtering"
> happen to them?
I received three emails with the virus - two from this list and
one from another list. None were filtered and all ended up in
my regular in box. None of
ost unconscious
> and occurs ahead of my ability to understand it."
> -Sam Abell; "Stay This Moment"
>
> "David P. Chernicoff" wrote:
> >
> > The file named in the subject is a virus. Just delete it. It was sent to
> > the PDML list from an acco
Are these people even list members. I can't help but think
someone's set this up to spam our list members and those of
other lists.
"Nicolas Colarusso, cga" wrote:
>
> Just got another email with a virus from [EMAIL PROTECTED] It is the
> same virus from Graham
> Anyone else have this "non-filtering" happen to them?
I had the same thing, now fixed by adding "Reply-To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
to the rule.
Vadim.
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the
icious, I didn't open the
programme or file or
whatever it is. Now, I'm glad I didn't.
Anyone else have this "non-filtering" happen to them?
regards,
frank
Jackie Lee Mowery wrote:
> Are you aware you are sending out a virus, the WordMacro32 virus? Plea
cious
> and occurs ahead of my ability to understand it."
> -Sam Abell; "Stay This Moment"
>
> "David P. Chernicoff" wrote:
> >
> > The file named in the subject is a virus. Just delete it. It was sent to
> > the PDML list from an account for Ri
The attachment is a virus!
DO NOT RUN IT!
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
501 - 594 of 594 matches
Mail list logo
