Re: [Pdns-users] Why was content length increased?

2015-02-19 Thread Michael Loftis
DNSSEC and DKIM. On Thursday, February 19, 2015, Nick Williams wrote: > I'm upgrading to authoritative 3.4 and noticed that the records.content > column has been increased from 255 characters to 64000 characters. Because > my table is UTF-8, I get the following error: > > mysql> ALTER TABLE reco

Re: [Pdns-users] pdns-recursor works but pdns discards responses

2015-02-19 Thread rooster
> On 2015-01-26, at 5:38 PM, rooster wrote: > > Hello list, > > I have pdns-recursor and pdns on the same host and port but on > different IP’s. When I query pdns and it can not answer, so it passes the > query on to pdns-recursor, which then responds with the answer but then pdns > di

Re: [Pdns-users] Why was content length increased?

2015-02-19 Thread Robert Locke
Hi Nick, We use TEXT (utf-8) and have had no performance issues so far. My understanding is that the innodb engine handles text efficiently - the “content” data is stored inline in the general case, and only stored on a separate page if it’s above a certain size for a given row. Cheers, Rob

Re: [Pdns-users] pdns-recursor works but pdns discards responses

2015-02-19 Thread rooster
> I downloaded, compiled and installed the recently released 3.4.2 from > the PowerDNS releases web page but I was unable to get it to launch. :( > > The error I am getting is “Unable to launch, no backends configured for > querying” which is very odd since when I did the compile, I

Re: [Pdns-users] pdns-recursor works but pdns discards responses

2015-02-19 Thread rooster
> We had a similar report from a Solaris SPARC user; a fix for his problem went > into the 3.4.0 release, but we never got an answer about whether it helped. > > Can you please try with pens-server 3.4.0 or higher, and let us know if that > fixes it? > > Kind regards, > -- > Peter van Dijk H

Re: [Pdns-users] pdns-recursor works but pdns discards responses

2015-02-19 Thread rooster
> We had a similar report from a Solaris SPARC user; a fix for his problem went > into the 3.4.0 release, but we never got an answer about whether it helped. > > Can you please try with pens-server 3.4.0 or higher, and let us know if that > fixes it? > > Kind regards, > -- > Peter van Dijk H

Re: [Pdns-users] pdns-recursor works but pdns discards responses

2015-02-19 Thread rooster
I had an e-mail client issue and this message was never sent. Sending now. There are three other messages with the same problem. *** > On 2015-01-29, at 8:02 AM, Peter van Dijk wrote: > > Hello Rooster, > We had a similar report from a Solaris SPARC user; a fix for his problem went > into

Re: [Pdns-users] When was ordername column added to records table?

2015-02-19 Thread Nick Williams
On Feb 19, 2015, at 3:05 PM, Christian Hofstaedtler wrote: > >> On 19 Feb 2015, at 22:37, k...@rice.edu wrote: >> On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 03:34:06PM -0600, Nick Williams wrote: >>> The schema for PDNS 3.0 shows no "ordername" column or "orderindex" index >>> on the records table: >>> https://gi

Re: [Pdns-users] When was ordername column added to records table?

2015-02-19 Thread Christian Hofstaedtler
> On 19 Feb 2015, at 22:37, k...@rice.edu wrote: > On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 03:34:06PM -0600, Nick Williams wrote: >> The schema for PDNS 3.0 shows no "ordername" column or "orderindex" index on >> the records table: >> https://github.com/PowerDNS/pdns/blob/auth-3.0/pdns/no-dnssec.schema.pgsql.sql

Re: [Pdns-users] When was ordername column added to records table?

2015-02-19 Thread Nick Williams
On Feb 19, 2015, at 3:37 PM, k...@rice.edu wrote: > On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 03:34:06PM -0600, Nick Williams wrote: >> I'm a bit curious because, looking through the code history, I can't find >> any evidence of it. >> >> The schema for PDNS 3.0 shows no "ordername" column or "orderindex" index

Re: [Pdns-users] When was ordername column added to records table?

2015-02-19 Thread k...@rice.edu
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 03:34:06PM -0600, Nick Williams wrote: > I'm a bit curious because, looking through the code history, I can't find any > evidence of it. > > The schema for PDNS 3.0 shows no "ordername" column or "orderindex" index on > the records table: > > https://github.com/PowerDNS/

[Pdns-users] When was ordername column added to records table?

2015-02-19 Thread Nick Williams
I'm a bit curious because, looking through the code history, I can't find any evidence of it. The schema for PDNS 3.0 shows no "ordername" column or "orderindex" index on the records table: https://github.com/PowerDNS/pdns/blob/auth-3.0/pdns/no-dnssec.schema.pgsql.sql And the upgrade instructi

Re: [Pdns-users] Currently using distro packages, want to update

2015-02-19 Thread Alan Hodgson
On Thursday, February 19, 2015 03:13:51 PM Nicholas Williams wrote: > > - Since I won't have auto dependency management, what dependencies do I > > need installed to install PDNS from RPM? You can use yum to install a local RPM, and it will resolve dependencies (yum localinstall rpmfile, I believ

[Pdns-users] Why was content length increased?

2015-02-19 Thread Nick Williams
I'm upgrading to authoritative 3.4 and noticed that the records.content column has been increased from 255 characters to 64000 characters. Because my table is UTF-8, I get the following error: mysql> ALTER TABLE records MODIFY content VARCHAR(64000); ERROR 1074 (42000): Column length too big for

Re: [Pdns-users] Currently using distro packages, want to update

2015-02-19 Thread Nicholas Williams
So I've gathered now that I can get 3.4.2 from https://www.monshouwer.eu/download/3rd_party/pdns/el6/ for my CentOS 6 machine, https://www.monshouwer.eu/download/3rd_party/pdns/el7/ fro my CentOS 7 machine, and http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/server:/dns/SLE_12/ for my OpenSUSE 12 mac

[Pdns-users] LUA iputils netmaskgroup match

2015-02-19 Thread Niels Peen
Hello, I’m using a netmaskgroup to see if a given IP matches: if nmg:match(ca) then .. This works very well but I would like to know which specific netmask matched. E.g. by having :match (also) return the matching netmask rather than (just) returning true. Am I correct that this is currently

Re: [Pdns-users] Windows 7 computers not getting split horizon change made by Lua script

2015-02-19 Thread bert hubert
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 03:26:42PM +0100, h...@nitramlexa.com wrote: > It works like a dream for everybody BUT Windows 7. > Android, Linux and Windows XP all get the LAN address when asking > for mail.example.com, but Windows 7 gets the public address. Check with tcpdump what answers you are reall

[Pdns-users] Windows 7 computers not getting split horizon change made by Lua script

2015-02-19 Thread hw
My setup is as follows: All servers are Centos 7 x86_64 running under VMware ESXi 5.1. My DNS/firewall running PDNS 3.4.1 and PDNS-RECURSOR 3.6.2 has 2 NICs. 1 has one static public IP (79.142.xx.yy), and the other is on my LAN (192.168.3.1/24). The IP in my DNS for the mail server is the pu