Dear Kirsti,
you are always welcome. He also wrote a two volume phenomenology of law.
Best,
Stefan
Am 23. November 2016 14:02:38 MEZ, schrieb kirst...@saunalahti.fi:
>Hi Stefan,
>
>Very interesting! Especially because the author is a lawyer. Still, I
>doubt I'll have time to read these.
>
>An
Dear Stefan, list:
To illustrate better what I mean, consider the following:
The surprising fact, opponent of female suffrage *C*, is observed.
But if the woman-drama *A* were true, then C would be a matter of course.
Hence, *there is reason to suspect* that A is true.
“Opponent of femal
Stefan, Ben, list:
You say
*there stands the word ‘democracy’ *
*and uses of the word ‘hypotheses’ *
*and that it is ‘just an example’*.
But hypotheses, examples and words are powerful and reflect much of the way
we situate ourselves in Thought.
For example, (not sure whether this examp
Ben, List
wow, that is interesting! Thanks!
Also these quotes from the fixation of belief fit into the picture:
"The method of authority will always govern the mass of mankind; and those who
wield the various forms of organized force in the state will never be convinced
that dangerous reasonin
I've dug a few things up, some of it interesting, some of it also ugly.
Peirce had more than one mood.
Last pagragraph in Peirce's review in _The Nation_, Vol. 67, Aug. 25,
1898, 153-155, of _The Psychology of Suggestion_ by Boris Sidis with an
introduction by William James.
http://www.sidis.
Jerry,
i believe we are talking about different things. Obviously there stands the
word 'democracy', but it is mentioned within a list of different uses of the
word 'hypotheses'. Therefore it is possible, that it is just an example and
does not necessarily express his personal views on democra