Dear list:
“the fact that A presents B with gift C...”
“I cannot forget that there are the germs of the *theory of the categories*
which is (if anything is) the gift I make to the world. That is my child.
In it I shall live when oblivion has me — my body”
The surprising fact, *C*, is
List, Charles:
> On Apr 30, 2017, at 2:43 PM, Charles Pyle wrote:
>
> Many years ago linguists chewed over the issue of whether the semantic
> analysis of three place predicates can be broken down into a series of two
> place predicates and discovered that the two are
I can't tell who wrote the following quote, so I am not sure who to address
here.
Many years ago linguists chewed over the issue of whether the semantic analysis
of three place predicates can be broken down into a series of two place
predicates and discovered that the two are not semantically
Jon and Jerry,
JA
triadic relations extend across a threshold of complexity, such that
relations of all higher adicities can be analyzed in terms of 1-adic,
2-adic, and 3-adic relations.
No. Peirce never said that. Many logicians have correctly observed
that you can replace any triadic
Jeff, Jon S,
Sorry, I'm a bit late following up on this thread - but I only have a few
comments to add anyway.
JS: Peirce obviously endorsed analyzing the Sign-Object relation as dyadic
by excluding the Interpretant.
GF: Yes, in a way, but he did not exclude the Interpretant in his
List:
> On Apr 29, 2017, at 10:41 PM, John F Sowa wrote:
>
> Re mathematical category theory: Many mathematicians believe that
> the term 'category theory' was a poor choice. The focus of category
> theory is on the mappings or morphisms. The things that are mapped
> could
Re: ( https://list.iupui.edu/sympa/arc/peirce-l/2017-04/msg00340.html )
( https://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2017/04/25/icon-index-symbol-%e2%80%a2-10/ )
( https://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2017/04/27/icon-index-symbol-%e2%80%a2-11/ )
(