Jon, List:
> On Jul 5, 2018, at 4:59 PM, Jon Alan Schmidt wrote:
>
> Jerry C., List:
>
> What would be some examples of medad Rhemes that are not Propositions? If
> there are any, why did Peirce explicitly affirm (at least twice) that a medad
> Rheme is a Proposition? Or is there an import
> On Jul 5, 2018, at 4:18 PM, g...@gnusystems.ca wrote:
>
> Jerry,
>
> It seems you were only able to find one quote from Peirce on the subject;
> here are a few more.
>
Gary: You are correct. I am not a CSP scholar so no further search was made.
Indeed, as my work on the logic of life progr
List, Gary:
> On Jul 5, 2018, at 4:18 PM, g...@gnusystems.ca wrote:
>
> [ I, therefore, take a position quite similar to that of the English
> logicians, beginning with Scotus himself, in regarding this introductory part
> of logic as nothing but an analysis of what kinds of signs are absolutel
List:
> On Jul 5, 2018, at 4:18 PM, g...@gnusystems.ca wrote:
>
> [[ Nothing can be more preposterous than to base that grammatica speculativa
> which forms the first part of logic upon the usages of language. ] Harvard
> Lecture 6 (Turrisi p. 235)]
A very strange abuse of the history of the te
List, Gary
> On Jul 5, 2018, at 4:18 PM, g...@gnusystems.ca wrote:
>
> [[ I do not, for my part, regard the usages of language as forming a
> satisfactory basis for logical doctrine. Logic, for me, is the study of the
> essential conditions to which signs must conform in order to function as
>
