> On Jul 5, 2018, at 4:18 PM, g...@gnusystems.ca wrote: > > Jerry, > > It seems you were only able to find one quote from Peirce on the subject; > here are a few more. > Gary: You are correct. I am not a CSP scholar so no further search was made. Indeed, as my work on the logic of life progresses,… . > [[ It seems to me, then, that appeals to language can serve no other purpose > than as most inadequate and deceptive evidence of psychological necessities > or tendencies; and these psychological necessities and tendencies, after they > are ascertained, are utterly useless for the investigation of logical > questions. ] CP 2.70, 1902] > > This quote seems very very strange from an historical perspective. Can anyone defend it today?
Cheers jerry
----------------------------- PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to peirce-L@list.iupui.edu . To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to l...@list.iupui.edu with the line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .
