Re: [PEIRCE-L] Phaneroscopy and logic

GaryF., List: Thank you for your comments and perspectives. Your perspective on the role of chemistry in CSP writings has changed in the past decade, has it not? Next, a comment on a critical historical facet of chemistry. Inorganic chemistry developed from mining, smelting, coinage, weaponry,

[PEIRCE-L] Fwd: Charles S. Peirce Society Newsletter 3:1

Forwarded FYI. This is a most informative newsletter and, so, I encourage all Peirce forum members to at least glance through it. There are a number of surprises, I think. GR Charles S. Peirce Society Newsletter 3:1 Charles S. Peirce Society Newsletter 3:1 View this email in your browser

RE: [PEIRCE-L] Phaneroscopy and logic

Gary R, list, The very concept of teridentity is intriguing, and plays a central role in the interface between phaneroscopy and Existential Graphs (and thus logic) that I am trying to explore — which also makes it central to the “major shift in Peirce’s thinking” which I see occurring in the

RE: [PEIRCE-L] The pragmatics of Peirce .. and its importance

Gary, Jon, Ronald, List, Gary, I read your http://www.iupui.edu/~arisbe/menu/library/aboutcsp/richmond/InteropArisbe.pdf You distinguish three levels of interoperability. The Syntactic, semantic and

[PEIRCE-L] The danger of destroying Peirce's semeiotic (was Ambiguities...

BODY { font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:12px; }Gary R - I have no problem with you and I having conceptual differences. There is absolutely nothing wrong with conceptual differences!! And I note that you were courteous and did NOT tell me that my views are

RE: [PEIRCE-L] Phaneroscopy and logic

Jerry C, to answer your question, In that post, was not trying to say anything about the chemical sciences as they exist today; and Peirce himself was not trying to inform his readers about chemical science when he adopted the “valency” analogy to construct a hypothesis about the elements of