Re: Re: [PEIRCE-L] Methodology (was To put an end to the false debate...

2020-05-17 Thread michaelcjm
List, Jerry Chandler's contribution today at 2.54 hours in "To put an end" is an ideal example of what you three (and I) are talking about; focus is merely post by post, and all members are (I assume) pitching in to help all the other members at each instant. Jerry cited chemistry. (Linguis

Re: Re: [PEIRCE-L] Methodology (was To put an end to the false debate...

2020-05-17 Thread Edwina Taborsky
John and Auke I think Auke has made a key comment - which is not merely the method of discussion and analysis, but the focus. As he noted, there can be two areas to focus on: Area 1] Peirce's text can be read as inspiration for semiotic research. In this case semiosis

Re: [PEIRCE-L] Methodology (was To put an end to the false debate...

2020-05-17 Thread a . breemen
John, I agree with your broadening up the seeming dichotomy to an open ended diversity. But I suggest to go all the way; also within a science we find different angles on the same subjectmatter. Semiotics not being excluded. But, I think there is a second current to be aware of in our discussi