[PEIRCE-L] Re: Communicating an Idea (was commens and commons)

List: According to Peirce in this manuscript, each *index* in an assertion denotes one of its *subjects*, either by a word or by "a mere look or gesture" (R 787:19[23], CP 2.338, c. 1895-6). How we distinguish those subjects is somewhat arbitrary. CSP: Thus, in the assertion, "all men are

[PEIRCE-L] Re: Differential Logic

Cf: Differential Logic • Discussion 3 At: http://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2020/06/17/differential-logic-%e2%80%a2-discussion-3/ Re: R.J. Lipton https://rjlipton.wordpress.com/about-me/ Re: Phttps://rjlipton.wordpress.com/2020/06/16/pnp/ Instead of boolean circuit complexity I would look at

Re: Re: [PEIRCE-L] Peirce's Way of Thinking (was Theory and Analysis of Semeiosis)

Jon Alen, I do not see from your quote of Edwina that she states that the logical and the final interpretant are the same. And just repeating quotes does not solve interprative difficulties. best, Auke > Op 16 juni 2020 om 19:32 schreef Jon Alan Schmidt : > > Auke, List: > > >