ch
> Peirce seems to have discerned and which Chomsky, too seems to place in
> recursion insofar as recursion is understood as a regularity which can/does
> produce/generate differences in structural form.
>
> Best
>
> Jack
>
> From: peirce-l-requ...@list.iup
as it is still very much up
> in the air, and, in truth, off the beaten track of what I'm supposed to be
> doing (which is why I've thrown it to the "floor"!).
>
> Best
>
> Jack
>
> --
> *From:* peirce-l-requ...@list.iupui.e
ck
From: peirce-l-requ...@list.iupui.edu on
behalf of Jerry Rhee
Sent: Monday, October 4, 2021 7:58 PM
To: Jon Alan Schmidt
Cc: Peirce-L
Subject: Re: [PEIRCE-L] [EXTERNAL] Fwd: Re: Cognitive Signs (was All Semiotic,
No Puzzle)
Dear Jack, list,
You hav
rt, though, is that Bourdieu locates in *habitus* the
>> same order of generative principle which Peirce seems to have discerned and
>> which Chomsky, too seems to place in recursion insofar as recursion is
>> understood as a regularity which can/does produce/generate differences
tood as a regularity which can/does produce/generate differences in
> structural form.
>
> Best
>
> Jack
>
> ------
> *From:* peirce-l-requ...@list.iupui.edu
> on behalf of Jon Alan Schmidt
> *Sent:* Monday, October 4, 2021 5:36 PM
>
Sent: Monday, October 4, 2021 3:54 PM
To: peirce-l@list.iupui.edu<mailto:peirce-l@list.iupui.edu>
mailto:peirce-l@list.iupui.edu>>;
tabor...@primus.ca<mailto:tabor...@primus.ca>
mailto:tabor...@primus.ca>>
Subject: Re: [PEIRCE-L] [EXTERNAL] Fwd: Re: Cognitive Signs (was All Semioti
Jack, list
With regard to your comment:
"With regard to this, though - if the DO becomes an Object once
connected to you, that is, within your universe of sensate
experience, does it not hold that differences between IOs amongst
various people and species imply the exist
--
> *From:* peirce-l-requ...@list.iupui.edu
> on behalf of JACK ROBERT KELLY CODY
> *Sent:* Monday, October 4, 2021 3:54 PM
> *To:* peirce-l@list.iupui.edu ;
> tabor...@primus.ca
> *Subject:* Re: [PEIRCE-L] [EXTERNAL] Fwd: Re: Cognitive Signs (was All
> Semiotic, No Puzzle
Edwina, List,
You make a lot of interesting points. I agree, polysemy isn't necessarily
inefficient - in fact, your point is much more interesting: from the poverty of
stimulus perspective, polysemy might be viewed as the ultimate mode of
efficiency (the prerequisite for abductive abstraction -
Jack, list
I think there are multiple meanings of 'efficient' and
'inefficient'.
By 'inefficient', I can understand that the energy/matter of the
input data can be lost [entropy]; it doesn't become part of the
stored knowledge base of the Representamen/Sign. I wouldn't co
er 4, 2021 3:54 PM
To: peirce-l@list.iupui.edu ; tabor...@primus.ca
Subject: Re: [PEIRCE-L] [EXTERNAL] Fwd: Re: Cognitive Signs (was All Semiotic,
No Puzzle)
Edwina, List,
Thanks for you reply!
An inefficient interaction provides no information; it's just brute
action/reaction.
Doesn&
Edwina, List,
Thanks for you reply!
An inefficient interaction provides no information; it's just brute
action/reaction.
Doesn't this depend on how we define "inefficient"? Because Peirce sets the
dyadic (action/reaction) up as the most efficient - "...nothing ever happens
but the continued
12 matches
Mail list logo
