Jeff, List:
Again, I am shifting this exchange to the new thread.
First of all, CP 1.537 is from 1903, when Peirce still thought of semiosis
as an "infinite series" of Signs in both directions. By 1906 (CP 4.536),
he recognized that some Signs *do not* have other Signs as their
Interpretants--t
Gary R., List:
I am shifting this exchange to the new thread where I posted the diagram.
I would not (yet) say that the IO and II are *sufficient *to constitute the
Sign; there may still be some remainder when they are analytically
distinguished from it. However, I have come to realize that we
