(The undistorted figure is attached.)
Ben wrote:
(100414-1)
Most generally a triad is a trio. A predicate is called triadic if it is
predicated of three objects like so: Pxyz. In Peirce's system a genuine
triad is one involving irred
Jon,
I am afraid your answer is as incomprehensible to me as was your original
remark that prompted my question.
With all the best.
Sung
> Thread:
> JA:http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.science.philosophy.peirce/14286
> JA:http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.science.philosophy.peirce/14290
> GF:ht
Ben, list,
It is my understanding that the mathematical category is another name for
semiosis. In other words, a category is to mathematicians hat semiosis is
to semioticians.
To quote Peirce from http://www.iupui.edu/~arisbe/rsources/76DEFS/76defs.HTM:
A "sign" is anything, A, which,
(1) in
Sungchul, list
I know next to nothing about category theory.
Most generally a triad is a trio. A predicate is called triadic if it
is predicated of three objects like so: /Pxyz/. In Peirce's system a
genuine triad is one involving irreducibly triadic action, called
semiosis, among three corr
Jon
"Trying to comprehend triadic relations by
means of their projective trichotomies is a project
ultimately doomed to fail."
A couple of concrete examples would help in understanding what you mean by
the doomed failure you are referring to.
With all the best.
Sung
Jon, List:
It appears to me that your distinction is one that needs to carefully examined.
Please cite the reference texts.
Clearly, the triadic triad is not a mathematical partition. Period. Full Stop.
End of Narrative.
Why anyone would thin so is beyond my comprehension.
Your concerns about
Jeff D., Jon,
I'd just like to note that the questions of triads versus trichotomies
is something that we've discussed a number of times at peirce-l over the
years. For my part, I like using those words in the way that Jon and
others have recommended - 'triad' for the triadically related sign,
Hello Jon,
If you have links to the earlier discussions of the distinction between
"triadicities" and "trichotomies", I'd like to take a look. In addition to
being interested in distinction you are making, I'd like to read more about how
you are thinking about the projection of the triadic rel
Jon, you wrote,
"It has long been my practice to maintain a separation between original
source texts and their various interpretant texts and I continue to believe
that this is the better practice from the standpoint of both scholarship and
encouraging critical thinking than dicing and slicing a so
