BODY { font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:12px;
}JAS, list:
ET: Essentially, then, pragmatism/icism is the abductive
examination of Thirdness, or, hypotheses about the laws governing
observable instantiations. And it is rooted in percepts, in the
actual observable worl
Edwina, List:
It sounds to me like we are generally in agreement.
JAS: As I have said repeatedly in defense of our terminological
discussions here, the goal is always to make our (and Peirce's) ideas clear;
but that is not an end in itself--it is simply an indispensable step toward
developing ap
BODY { font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:12px;
}List
In my view, terminological 'definitions' do not 'make our ideas
clear'. And pragmatism has nothing to do with definitions.
JAS wrote: "According to Peirce, it [note: pragmatism] is "merely
a method
y Richmond' ; Auke van Breemen
Onderwerp: Re: RE: Re: [PEIRCE-L] was EGs and Phaneroscopy
Auke wrote: RE: I would formulate the goal not as looking for an
explanation. For me, such an enterprise ought to aid in getting
better immediate objects of the dynamical object that is being
st
go
together with a plan for action that delivers a solution.
Best,
Auke van Breemen
Van: Edwina Taborsky
Verzonden: zondag 17 februari 2019 17:06
Aan: tabor...@primus.ca; 'Peirce-L' ; 'Gary Richmond'
; Auke van Breemen
Onderwerp: Re: RE: Re: [PEIRCE-L] was
Auke wrote: RE: I would formulate the goal not as looking for an
explanation. For me, such an enterprise ought to aid in getting
better immediate objects of the dynamical object that is being
studied. Diagrams are excellent means to come to grips with complex
systems by supporting and or
