Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [PEIRCE-L] Lecture by Terrence Deacon

2019-08-03 Thread Jon Alan Schmidt
Edwina, List: ET: You are merging 'idealism' and 'objective idealism' and the two are not synonyms of each other. Of course they are not synonyms; as I already explained, *objective *idealism is one *variety *of idealism, and *subjective *idealism is another. Peirce was distinguishing his "Sch

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [PEIRCE-L] Lecture by Terrence Deacon

2019-08-03 Thread Edwina Taborsky
BODY { font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:12px; }JAS, list Again, I disagree with your interpretation. You are merging 'idealism' and 'objective idealism' and the two are not synonyms of each other. I disagree that Peirce sees 'Mind as more fundamental

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [PEIRCE-L] Lecture by Terrence Deacon

2019-08-03 Thread Jon Alan Schmidt
Edwina, List: ET: Peirce did write that "the physical law as derived and special, the psychical law alone as primordial, which is idealism" 6.24. BUT he did NOT say that he accepted this - ie, with idealism alone as primordial; and the physical as derived. On the contrary, he plainly stated tha

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [PEIRCE-L] Lecture by Terrence Deacon

2019-08-03 Thread Edwina Taborsky
BODY { font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:12px; }JAS, list Please define 'objective idealism'. As a 'species of idealism' [and I'm not sure what that means] - please explain the difference between 'idealism' and 'objective idealism'. I don't object to the term o