We are apparently looking at different numbers. I am looking at the numbers
stamped on the photocopies made by the team from Texas Tech in the mid-70's
(Fisch, Ketner, et al) on the basis of which the Peirce Edition Project
originally established itself. They appear at the bottom of the photoc
I have no problem with this, Thomas, as showing the need for the distinction
of the existent vs. the real, but then I wasn't really putting the need for
it in question but only intending to indicate that I don't always understand
how to apply it effectively.
Joe Ransdell
- Original Message
Dear Thomas Riese,
Thanks for your response. That Wiener link is surprising -- he even
mentions Luigi Pirandello! However, from the quote, it seems Peirce
had the British in mind... (which leaves Schiller and his
entourage...)
Martin Lefebvre
---
Message from peirce-l forum to subscriber a
Joe,
Thanks for the access paths to Brier's work. I assumed that since he was
in the Copenhagen Business School in a wonderfully hybrid management
department that the dissertation might show some semiotic "mission" work in
the business community. You were right, though, the text doesn't have
> We are apparently looking at different numbers. I am looking
> at the numbers
> stamped on the photocopies made by the team from Texas Tech
> in the mid-70's
> (Fisch, Ketner, et al) on the basis of which the Peirce
> Edition Project
> originally established itself. They appear at the bot
What struck me immediately about Thomas's quote from CP 4.546 was its
distinction between logical subjects and meta-physical Subjects, or
"substances". Just this morning i've been perusing the Century Dictionary on
"subject", "subjective" and "subjectivity", all of which are on the UQAM
word li
Gary,
perhaps I have here something more that might be of interest for you:
Logic requires us, with reference to each question we have in hand, to
hope some
definite answer to it may be true. That *hope* with reference to *each
case* as
it comes up is, by a *saltus*, stated by logicians as
Forwarded
Joe Ransdell
- Original Message -
From: "Frigg,RP" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2006 2:09 PM
Subject: 3rd CFP: Representation in Art and Science
Beyond Mimesis and Nominalism: Representation in Art and Science
Two-day conference i
