Thanks Ben,
The proposition "She is possibly pregnant" is easily understood by all. I overstated my case. (nor is their a potential contradiction) But I think it masks a problem for the theory of cognition, and furthermore, not all ordinary expressions are as clear as they might be. So, we migh
Great
question, Jim! I can't even get started on an answer today, but I
will be at work on it tomorrow and try to get at least a start at an anwer
before the day is out.
Joe
Oh thanks Joe. I'm relieved to hear
that! Reflecting a bit more I see that I should hav
Great question, Jim! I can't even get started on an answer today, but I will be at work on it tomorrow and try to get at least a start at an anwer before the day is out.
Joe
- Original Message From: Jim Piat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: Peirce Discussion Forum Sent: Saturday, September 9,
Dear Joe,
Thanks for your informal and very helpful
response. I think I was misunderstanding the introductory passage in the
New List. So I have a few more questions. First some
background. My understanding is that signs refer to and stand for the
meaning of objects. In standing for o
Here is the URL for the on-line journal SEED, which has a lot of papers by Peirceans:
http://www.library.utoronto.ca/see/pages/SEED_Journal.html
It's edited by Edwina Taborsky. You might want to jot the URL
down now or go there and get a "bookmark" or "favorites" URL for your
browser.
