Title: Message
Gary,
Well, it seems we are going
in different directions at the moment.
- You are involved in
studying semiosis along lines of sign types, while I am wondering how to
understand the process by which a sign that offers itself and is capable
of producing a logical
Title: Message
Gary,
You
write:
Sarbo/Farkas do refer to their proto-signs
as "aspects of signs
I suggested the use of
'aspects of signs' for the proto-sign article. Precisely in order to get clear
that not the triadically determined sign types are meant. A matter that was
troubling him
Auke,
Thank you for providing the link to Sarbo's Proto-Signs piece.
http://www.cs.ru.nl/research/reports/full/ICIS-R05031.pdf
This will certainly be very helpful for those who are interested in
examining Sarbo's 9-adic proto-semiotic
I had
betterphrased it thus: by the addition...sneaks
Auke,
Another inter-paragraphical response, then we can both get back to
work towards our deadlines :-)
Auke van Breemen wrote:
<>[GR] But the so-called Welby classification involves the
consideration of the role of the interpretant in semeiotic moving
theoretically somewhat far beyond the
Title: Message
Gary R,
Thanks for your
reply.
GR:
As a supplement to the URL Joe supplied for "knowledge management" I'd like
to add several others, all from Wikipedia. First, I would like to suggest
that ICCS and CGs are more closely associated with "knowledge representation"
than with
Auke van Breemen wrote:
Message
By now we
have:
knowledge
management
knowledge
reperesentation
Gary, could
you give me a clue about how conceptualization fits in? I mean with
this the way in which we individually or collaboratively make our vague
and indistinct ideas clear.
Gary,
Thanks for your extensive answer. It is more then I asked for but the
surplus does address an important issue.
I think it comes down to whether it is correct to hold, as you do, that
the 9 aspects can not be useful for anything except for establishing the
10 types of signs. As in:
GR: My
Auke,
Thank you for your good and thoughtful response. At the moment I've so
many deadlines approaching that I won't be able to add more than a few
inter-paragraphical comments.
But first allow to apologize for not acknowledging your co-authorship
of "Natural Grammar.". The copy that Sarbo
Joe, Ben, List,
I agree with Joe that Ben should be at the ICCS workshop!
Finding your discussion of considerable interest and thinking that Aldo
de Moor might as well, I wrote the following: to him (I'd forwarded Aldo
most of that earlier exchange, not reproduced below).
Hi, Aldo,
FYI,
Joe, list,
JR wrote:
I googled the term knowledge management and immediately found a very
informative website, very intelligently structured as an answer to the
question of what knowledge management is. Here is the URL:
http://encyclopedia.thefreedictionary.com/knowledge+management
Very
Auke,
Thank you for your interesting comments and for the quite pertinent
Peirce quotation reminding us "that the essential function of a sign is
to render inefficient relations efficient." There seems to me to be a
great power in that notion both generally in semeiotic, but also and in
Dear Gary, Auke --
Which suggests to me the related notion that the
consequences of actions involving objects aresometimes more efficiently
determined by thinking them through with signs. Signs are tools for
forcasting the outcomes of events -- affording all those who have them a
great
of reform as well as technological enablement.
Joe Ransdell
- Original Message -
From: Gary Richmond [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Peirce Discussion Forum peirce-l@lyris.ttu.edu
Cc: Aldo de Moor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, March 26, 2006 8:15 AM
Subject: [peirce-l] Re: Conceptual Structures
nablement.
Joe Ransdell
- Original Message -
From: "Gary Richmond" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "Peirce Discussion Forum" peirce-l@lyris.ttu.edu
Cc: "Aldo de Moor" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, March 26, 2006 8:15 AM
Subject: [peirce-l] Re: Conceptual Str
Steven Ericsson Zenith wrote:
BTW: A "tool interoperability" workshop
is not something that I would
expect anyone here to find interesting - even if the tools do deal with
"conceptual structures" - which means, in this case, schemas and their
instances.
Steven,
I'm giving the keynote
@lyris.ttu.edu
Sent: Saturday, March 25, 2006 7:24 PM
Subject: [peirce-l] Re: Conceptual Structures Tool Interoperability Workshop
Joe,
I don't know how Gary will respond, but I googled around a bit and I think
that the main thing to keep in mind is that the knowledge involved is not at
all
16 matches
Mail list logo
