I would second Barkley's note re. Sid Shniad postings. So long
as they don't come too thick and fast, Sid is doing us a
valuable service.
==
Allin Cottrell
Department of Economics
Wake Forest University
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(910) 759-5762
==
s obtained in terms of real processes, is set
off as 'story'-telling.
======
Allin Cottrell
Department of Economics
Wake Forest University
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(910) 759-5762
==
the
precise citation for these remarks?
Thanks.
===
Allin Cottrell
Department of Economics
Wake Forest University
Winston-Salem, NC, USA
(910) 759-5762
===
of
economy-wide planning. Paul and I also have a working paper that
deals specifically with Hayek's 1945 article, 'The Use of Knowledge
in Society', which we hope to publish somewhere before long.
===
Allin Cottrell
Department of Economics
Wake Forest University
Winston-Salem, NC
t colorado (ftp to csf.colorado.edu, then go to
the sub-dir /econ/authors/Cottrell.Allin. The file is vms.ps.)
=======
Allin Cottrell
Department of Economics
Wake Forest University
Winston-Salem, NC 27109
(910) 759-5762
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
===
to say about the existence of firms than do modern neoclassicals.
I can't remember the title offhand, but it's in a volume edited by
Langlois, entitled "Economics as a Process."
=======
Allin Cottrell
Department of Economics
Wake Forest University
Winston-Salem, NC 27109
elphia, PA 19147. Ph. (215) 925-2762;
fax (215) 925-1912. (Since Paul and I are getting no royalties,
advertising in this medium does not seem out of order.)
You can see a description of the contents in the September 1994
issue of the JEL.
=======
Allin Cottrell
Department of
could someone give me the gopher path if one wants to consult the
pen-l archives? or the pkt archives? thanks ahead of time.
csf.colorado.edu: Heterodox Economics/Archives: Pkt
===
Allin Cottrell
Department of Economics
Wake Forest University
Winston-Salem, NC 27109
(910
l problems in measuring the
capital stock are more severe than those involved in measuring the
flow of profit income.
======
Allin Cottrell
Department of Economics
Wake Forest University
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(910) 759-5762
==
there may
be other problems with this formulation). The point is
that labor-power, since it is not produced under
capitalistic conditions, via a process that participates
in the formation of a general rate of profit, *doesn't
have* a "price of production" in Marx's sense.
====
ot; a scalar
representation of cost: they must, if people regard them as important,
be imposed as external constraints on narrowly "economic"
calculation.
==
Allin Cottrell
Department of Economics
Wake Forest University
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(910) 759-5762
==
laim
is that it does not abstract from an *essential* feature of the
process of capitalist competition. The F and M argument has its
weak points, and is certainly not beyond criticism; but I find
Ajit's dismissal patronizing and complacent.
======
Allin Cottrell
Department of Ec
laim
is that it does not abstract from an *essential* feature of the
process of capitalist competition. The F and M argument has its
weak points, and is certainly not beyond criticism; but I find
Ajit's dismissal patronizing and complacent.
======
Allin Cottrell
Department of Ec
nd the real interest-income of rentiers, and the
real rental income of landlords) is properly conceived as the
proceeds of the exploitation of (extraction of surplus labor from)
productive labor? Yes, I do. The arguments in the last several
"LTV Defense" postings were supposed to bear o
e, may be found in Economy and Society,
vol. 18, no. 1, 1989.
Thanks to everyone who offered encouragement along the way, and I
hope these postings have been of some use-value.
==
Allin Cottrell
Department of Economics
Wake Forest University
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(910) 759-5762
==
exploitation. Thus I
feel that Jim has this point backwards.
==
Allin Cottrell
Department of Economics
Wake Forest University
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(910) 759-5762
==
exploitation. Thus I
feel that Jim has this point backwards.
==
Allin Cottrell
Department of Economics
Wake Forest University
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(910) 759-5762
==
is only weakly producible and
(c) may be conceived as homogeneous as a tolerable first
approximation. Coming up: Some final suggestions on why the LTV is
properly privileged over any other XTV.
==
Allin Cottrell
Department of Economics
Wake Forest University
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(910) 759-5762
==
he struggle
of wage-workers against a capitalist class.
Next time I'll begin on my final topic, a fuller defense of the
'specialness' of labor as it relates to the LTV.
======
Allin Cottrell
Department of Economics
Wake Forest University
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(910) 759-5762
==
he struggle
of wage-workers against a capitalist class.
Next time I'll begin on my final topic, a fuller defense of the
'specialness' of labor as it relates to the LTV.
======
Allin Cottrell
Department of Economics
Wake Forest University
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(910) 759-5762
==
arx as the specific manifestation, under
capitalism, of the "necessity of the distribution of social labour in
specific proportions" in order to satisfy the conditions of reproduction
of any economic formation.
==
Allin Cottrell
Department of Economics
Wake Forest University
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(910) 759-5762
==
complete
automation). Labor is not employed because it 'happens to be
exploitable', but rather it is the exploitability of (non-optional) labor
that explains the possibility of profit.
======
Allin Cottrell
Department of Economics
Wake Forest University
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(910) 759-5762
==
arx as the specific manifestation, under
capitalism, of the "necessity of the distribution of social labour in
specific proportions" in order to satisfy the conditions of reproduction
of any economic formation.
==
Allin Cottrell
Department of Economics
Wake Forest University
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(910) 759-5762
==
complete
automation). Labor is not employed because it 'happens to be
exploitable', but rather it is the exploitability of (non-optional) labor
that explains the possibility of profit.
======
Allin Cottrell
Department of Economics
Wake Forest University
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(910) 759-5762
==
s necessity of the distribution of social labour in specific
proportions is certainly not abolished by the specific form of social
production; it can only change its form of manifestation.
==
Allin Cottrell
Department of Economics
Wake Forest University
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(910) 759-5762
==
s necessity of the distribution of social labour in specific
proportions is certainly not abolished by the specific form of social
production; it can only change its form of manifestation.
==
Allin Cottrell
Department of Economics
Wake Forest University
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(910) 759-5762
==
er field. That would identify
the source OK, but still means that we wouldn't have the option
of using the Reply command to dash off a response to the list,
without having to type in the PEN address.
======
Allin Cottrell
Department of Economics
Wake Forest University
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(910) 759-5762
==
ever,
be done. I think the second interpretation is the right one. More later.
==
Allin Cottrell
Department of Economics
Wake Forest University
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(910) 759-5762
==
y special about labor? Couldn't you
do the same sort of statistical number using oil-content, timber-content
or what-have-you? Why is the LTV of any more intrinsic significance
than the OTV or the TTV?
End of seventh message.
==
Allin Cottrell
Department of Economics
Wake Forest University
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(910) 759-5762
==
affian
prices -- but why should *that* be one's theoretical terminus if one's
ultimate object is to analyze real economies and their laws of motion?
End of posting the fourth.
==
Allin Cottrell
Department of Economics
Wake Forest University
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(910) 759-5762
==
affian
prices -- but why should *that* be one's theoretical terminus if one's
ultimate object is to analyze real economies and their laws of motion?
End of posting the fourth.
==
Allin Cottrell
Department of Economics
Wake Forest University
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(910) 759-5762
==
e this point before, but I wanted to set it out
systematically before developing its implications.
End of second posting.
==
Allin Cottrell
Department of Economics
Wake Forest University
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(910) 759-5762
==
m the effects of the
disturbing factors.
[Paras 5-7 above are based on notes made by Paul Cockshott.]
End of third posting.
==
Allin Cottrell
Department of Economics
Wake Forest University
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(910) 759-5762
==
mments to make about that
argument, but not at first.
End of preface.
End of first posting.
======
Allin Cottrell
Department of Economics
Wake Forest University
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(910) 759-5762
==
cal policy or swings in private-sector
investment demand. In AD/AS models, this will cause a temporary
departure from potential gnp, which will in turn cause a change in
inflation relative to money growth. Integrated over time, this
amounts to a change in the price level.
======
Alli
cal policy or swings in private-sector
investment demand. In AD/AS models, this will cause a temporary
departure from potential gnp, which will in turn cause a change in
inflation relative to money growth. Integrated over time, this
amounts to a change in the price level.
======
Alli
aikh's
study using the 1984 UK input-output tables: our
findings were essentially the same. Ricardo and Marx
were right: the labor theory of value stands up to
empirical scrutiny as well as just about any theory
in economics, and better than most!
======
Allin Cottrell
Depart
ers should be willing to lend at
lower rates, the _safer_ that lending appears to be.
======
Allin Cottrell
Department of Economics
Wake Forest University
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(910) 759-5762
==
ers should be willing to lend at
lower rates, the _safer_ that lending appears to be.
======
Allin Cottrell
Department of Economics
Wake Forest University
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(910) 759-5762
==
in the slave system would have been too
restricted).
======
Allin Cottrell
Department of Economics
Wake Forest University
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(910) 759-5762
==
e that Keynes ever
spelled out what he meant by this, or discussed the sort
of institutions that would be required to undertake this
"socialisation," but on the face of it, it sure sounds
like planning. No, it's not on the US agenda for the near
future, but is it something PKs should di
41 matches
Mail list logo