Doug Henwood wrote:
Sokal has now joined with ex-Social Text'er Bruce Robbins in a
campaign to get American Jews to sign a petition critical of Israeli
policy. Times change
No change, Sokal certainly was along side Social Text all along, he
must have loved those guys in the first place
Michael Perelman wrote:
Can anyone tell me why I get the messages from this virus from
people that I do not know at all?
I read somewhere that sircam not only gets target email addresses from
the infected PC's Outlook address book but also from parsing web pages
left in that PCs browser
Doug Henwood wrote:
Hmmm, well how do you feel about Sam Goldwyn's "Nobody goes there
anymore. It's too crowded."?
Not half so suggestive and obscure as Yogi's "observe by watching" but
just straightforward and literal: "No one" in my elite crowd "goes there
anymore. It's too crowded." with
George Pennefather wrote:
To say that the "wealth of those societies presents itself as an
immense accumulation of commodities" is not true. Much of the wealth
is in the form of industrial capital which is not capital in the form
of the commodity. This mistaken premise renders the validity
Chris Burford wrote:
A government has come to power in Austria in which already 10%
of the workers and their families are deprived of the vote, for
racial reasons.
Please forgive my ignorance, but how does that work? Does Austria
impose racial limitations on immigration? (There's
frances bolton wrote:
Lou writes:
Rod Hay wrote:
Other than calling each other idiots, I can't figure out what
this debate is about.
It is about the relevance of Marxism to precapitalist societies.
Wasn't it about the relevance, not of Marxism, but of technology,
specifically
Louis Proyect wrote:
At 05:00 PM 7/27/99 -0700, you wrote:
When I recevied this two days ago, I went to McAfee.com, a premier
virus protection software manufacturer, to check on it. At that
time there was NO listing, advisory, or warning about this
so-called virus. Before you
Max Sawicky wrote:
...In the U.S., if we universalized a system where health
care was "free," we would see greater increases in the
share of GDP devoted to health care.
If that were so our non-free health care would be less expensive, per
capita, than the free health care vended out by
S Pawlett wrote:
W. Kiernan wrote:
As far as I can see, those two typified or exemplified nothing
outside the classic textbook symptom list of paranoia.
I see. Time for a little schizo bashing. Why not? They can't defend
themselves, in fact they usually can't even understand what
Hello PEN-L!
Naturally everyone is sorry about the innocent victims, and horrified,
disgusted, repelled by what those two poor miserable psycho bastards
Harris and Klebold did. But they're not alive any more for us to hate;
fear and rage ate their minds, they went mad and now they're dead. So
10 matches
Mail list logo
